curious question

sklyiner98

New member
If you find a product with a very close chemical make-up as....let's say......superdrol. Does that mean it will still be as(or close to being) effective as the the original stuff?
 
Well, manufacturers alter the name for obvious reasons, but not neccessarily the chemical structure. Even very small alterations to a chemical makeup can have drastic effects on, well, the effects..lol
 
sklyiner98 said:
i can post the chemical name and not the brand name and get opinions right?
Click to expand...
You are free to post the compound and it's brand name, just don't post a source.
 
What these guys said. ANY change in chemical makeup changes the compounds properties (structural & constitutional isomers). Just compare cis-/trans- geometric isomers in fat. We all know the harmful effects of trans fat & chemically it's simply because the groups are bound oppossite each other as opposed to on the same plane. Same chemical formula except for a cis- or trans- in the front designating structure, huge differences in properties.
 
The chemical compound is 2a, 17a di methyl etiocholan 3-one, 17b-ol and its by Fast Action.

I've done a search on it and its comparable to methyl-drol xt, but i cant find any reviews on it(the Fast Action product), so should i just treat it like the methyl-drol?

Has anyone tried Fast Action? Someone asked it before and didnt get much of a response, so i thought i would give it another shot.
 
Compare the chemical formula to that of methyl-drol. Actually I have a bottle of Superdrol here, let me fetch it.

Ok, don't know why I just said all that lol. Anyways, chemical formula for Superdrol.

2a-17a-dimethyl-5a-androst-3-one

They don't appear to be the same compound. Similar structure though.
 
xxtruxx1 said:
Compare the chemical formula to that of methyl-drol. Actually I have a bottle of Superdrol here, let me fetch it.

Ok, don't know why I just said all that lol. Anyways, chemical formula for Superdrol.

2a-17a-dimethyl-5a-androst-3-one

They don't appear to be the same compound. Similar structure though.
Click to expand...
I believe etioallocholan is another way of writting 5a-androst and methy-drol is the same as sd.
 
I figured it was because I remembered methyl-drol coming out when Superdrol was being banned. I just wasn't sure if that was the chemical makeup of methyl-drol or not.

Wow, this insomnia is getting to me. I completely overlooked the etioallocholan for some reason, but you are correct, it is an IUPAC (I believe) way of rewriting 5a-androst or vice-versa. The extra alcohol (17b-ol) is throwing me off though? I'm having trouble understanding how it comes into play?

Then again it is 5:41am & I've slept 1 hour since Friday night. I'll take another look at this after I take a nap tomorrow.

It does look like the same compound though now that I take a second look, so treat it as Superdrol/methyl-drol. Be careful though, I believe the SD knockoffs that came out later were higher dosed than SD? 15mg vs. 10mg? Again I'm not sure. You might want to double check.

Lastly, since it's the same as both compounds, expect results to be the same as well. Reviews that applied to SD & MD should also apply to Fast Action considering all that has changed is the supp company.
 
MikeTheMan said:
I believe etioallocholan is another way of writting 5a-androst and methy-drol is the same as superdrol.
Click to expand...

WORD

using andro would make it technically illegal given the FDA's rules on prohormones
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top