Natty22
Banned
Cheers. To be honest, I remember when I first started doing cycles. I was told I was too lightweight to play the sport I wanted, so aimed for 28lbs in 8 weeks. Didn't care what it looked like, and achieved it. I looked really puffy and swollen, but I was happy because I'd put it on and was "bigger". What happened? First training of the new season I prolapsed 2 discs in my lower back because I was too heavy and my body couldn't cope with the rapid change in my physique.
Nowadays, I never aim to "bulk", but aim for a goal on lifting or a physique goal. But thinking back to when I first started, I can totally understand the OP's mindset.
I'd bet very few people when they first started got it perfect, although saying that the OP probably shouldn't be cycling if he's no real experience first. That said, he's going to cycle irrespective, so he'll have to learn as he goes.
More importantly, if he's taking halo, and it converts to Turinabol (which I'm sure it does), then he has absolutely no hope of 20lbs in 6 weeks surely? For me T'bol wasn't a "mass gainer", but gave a mild strength Increase which was probably placebo and made me look a bit harder?! It's surely nothing on some of the wetter compounds out there for all out mass (my experience with oral PH's ended with M1T and Phera).
And yeah apparently halo sorta converts to tbol, but more then anything it is anabolic on its own. It resembles tbol more then anything. That being said I shoulda added test shots to my cycle. Even a TRT amount woulda made the cycle better bc halo reduces free bound test