Fecal pellet output does not always correlate with colonic transit in response to restraint stress and corticotropin-releasing factor in rats.
* Nakade Y,
* Mantyh C,
* Pappas TN,
* Takahashi T.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
BACKGROUND: Fecal pellet output has been assessed as a colonic motor activity because of its simplicity. However, it remains unclear whether an acceleration of colonic transit correlates well with an increase in fecal pellet output. We examined the causal relationship between colonic transit and fecal pellet output stimulated by the central application of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and restraint stress. METHODS: Immediately after intracisternal injection of CRF, (51)Cr was injected via a catheter positioned in the proximal colon. Ninety minutes after (51)Cr injection, the total number of excreted feces was counted, and then the rats were killed. The radioactivity of each colonic segment was evaluated, and the geometric center (GC) of the distribution of (51)Cr was calculated. For the restraint stress study, after administration of (51)Cr into the proximal colon, rats were submitted to wrapping restraint stress for 90 min. Then they were killed, and GC was calculated. RESULTS: Both restraint stress and CRF significantly accelerated colonic transit. There was a positive correlation observed between fecal pellet output and GC of colonic transit in response to restraint stress, but not CRF, when the number of excreted feces was more than three. In contrast, there was no significant correlation observed between the two in stress and CRF when the number of excreted feces was less than two. CONCLUSIONS: The acceleration of colonic transit in response to restraint stress and central administration of CRF does not always correlate with an increase in fecal pellet output.
PMID: 17464456 [PubMed - in process]
Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography.
* Regadas FS,
* Murad-Regadas SM,
* Lima DM,
* Silva FR,
* Barreto RG,
* Souza MH,
* Filho FS.
Department of Surgery, Medical School of the Federal University of Ceara and Hospital Sao Carlos, Av Edilson Brasil Soares, 1892. Edson Queiroz, 60834-220, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil,
[email protected].
BACKGROUND: Demonstrate precisely the anatomic configuration of the anal canal and the length and thickness of the anal sphincters using three-dimensional (3-D) anorectal ultra-sonography in both genders. METHODS: Twelve normal volunteer males and 14 females, with a mean age of 52.4 and 50.3 years, respectively, were prospectively enrolled in this study. All individuals from both groups were submitted to anorectal ultra-sonography. The anal canal was analyzed, measuring the length and thickness of the external anal sphincter (EAE), internal anal sphincter (IAS), puborectalis muscle (PR) and the gap (distance from the anterior EAS to the anorectal junction) in the midline longitudinal (ML) and transverse (MT) planes, and the results were compared between quadrants and genders. RESULTS: The distribution of sphincter muscles is asymmetric in both genders. The anterior upper anal canal is an extension of the rectal wall with all layers clearly identified. The anterior IAS is formed in the distal upper anal canal and is significantly shorter in female than in male in all quadrants. The anterior IAS length is shorter than the posterior and lateral in both genders. The anterior EAS length is significantly shorter (2.2 cm) and the gap is longer (1.2 cm) in female than in male (3.4 cm) (0.7 cm) (p < 0.05), respectively. The posterior and lateral EAS-PR is significant longer in males (3.6 cm) (3.9 cm) than in females (3.2 cm) (3.5 cm) (p < 0.05), respectively. The lateral EAS-PR is significant longer than the posterior part in both genders. The anterior IAS is significantly thicker in males (0.19 cm) than in females (0.12 cm) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: 3-D anal endosonography enabled measurement of the different anatomical structures of the anal canal and demonstrated its asymmetrical configuration. The shorter anterior EAS and IAS associated with a longer gap could justify the higher incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction in females, especially fecal incontinence and anorectocele with rectal intussusception.
PMID: 17479327 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Anal Sphincter Laceration at Vaginal Delivery: Is This Event Coded Accurately?
* Brubaker L,
* Bradley CS,
* Handa VL,
* Richter HE,
* Visco A,
* Brown MB,
* Weber AM.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;. and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the error rate for discharge coding of anal sphincter laceration at vaginal delivery in a cohort of primiparous women. METHODS: As part of the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms study performed by the National Institutes of Health Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, we assessed the relationship between perineal lacerations and corresponding discharge codes in three groups of primiparous women: 393 women with anal sphincter laceration after vaginal delivery, 383 without anal sphincter laceration after vaginal delivery, and 107 after cesarean delivery before labor. Discharge codes for perineal lacerations were compared with data abstracted directly from the medical record shortly after delivery. Patterns of coding and coding error rates were described. RESULTS: The coding error rate varied by delivery group. Of 393 women with clinically recognized and repaired anal sphincter lacerations by medical record documentation, 92 (23.4%) were coded incorrectly (four as first- or second-degree perineal laceration and 88 with no code for perineal diagnosis or procedure). One (0.3%) of the 383 women who delivered vaginally without clinically reported anal sphincter laceration was coded with a sphincter tear. No women in the cesarean delivery group had a perineal laceration diagnostic code. Coding errors were not related to the number of deliveries at each clinical site. CONCLUSION: Discharge coding errors are common after delivery-associated anal sphincter laceration, with omitted codes representing the largest source of errors. Before diagnostic coding can be used as a quality measure of obstetric care, the clinical events of interest must be appropriately defined and accurately coded. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PMID: 17470596 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]