Best Overall Chest Development Excercise

Best excercise for overall chest mass?

  • Inclinde Dumbell Press

    Votes: 326 31.2%

  • Flat Dumbell Press

    Votes: 240 23.0%

  • Incline Barbell

    Votes: 126 12.1%

  • Flat barbell

    Votes: 248 23.8%

  • Weighted Dips

    Votes: 104 10.0%
  • Total voters
    1,044
Dumb newbie question: Most of you guys seem to prefer incline dbs. I usually start of with the flat bb presses and then move to incline and decline db presses. Is that okay?
 
god bless the hammer strength dip machine..god i love that piece of equipment..althought the nautilus is great too
 
My favorite chest movements are pretty simple:

Dumbbell flyes(flat/incline)
Dumbbell press(flat/incline)
Dips, no added weight until failure
 
bigpetefox said:
My favorite chest movements are pretty simple:

Dumbbell flyes(flat/incline)
Dumbbell press(flat/incline)
Dips, no added weight until failure
Click to expand...
definitely agree on the flat bench db flyes... nothing gets the inside of my chest like those
 
I find changing my grip on the bench works as well, I used to powerlift, and some habits do die hard, now I still have the muscle to lift more weights than your average girl :) But bench press,
 
I was surprised to see inclined dumbbell on top. I do flat dumbbell and voted inclined barbell,but guessed inclined barbell was voted #1,because of the heavier weight used.
 
u guys that like flyes should try this.try using one arm at a time and bringing ur arm across ur chest little over the middle then back it off then begin ur other arm towards the middle of ur chest and a little over(this would work good with cables) this takes a little practice but will def feel a much bigger contraction which is what u really want imo
 
I have never realu understood how incline presses can work your chest as effectively.

Everyone knows that the higher the incline the more you utilise your shoulders.
So what does thie mean?

Flat presse ( primarly chest)
Incline ( priomarly shoulders and chest)
Now seeing as you are incorportaing another major muscle, the weight on inclines should go up stubstantialy, should it not?

it should , unless the emphasis is being taken off the chest. That is the problem with inclines. I remember reading a study ( i am sory not to quote it ) that talked about chest effort on flat/incline/decline.
It talked about incline havily taking the effort off the chest and I think flat press gave something like 30 - 40% more stimualtion ( how they quantify this is anyones guess).

Everyone thinks it puts more effort on the upper chest and in away this is true, but its realy just taking the effort of the lower chest.
So flat presses were best for upper and lower chest, while Inclines were better for shoulders, equal fopr upper chest and worse for lower chest.

Only reason i would use Incline as a primary mover is if my lower chest was overly developed or i realy wanted to work on shoulders.
 
Every time you work chest,whether flat incline decline,your weaker triceps are more likely to give out before your chest. When i want to give a muscle full stimulation,i will use an exhaustion set right before my work set. Pec or flys for chest,pullups or machine pulldowns for biceps,tricep pushdowns for yup triceps. It works great
 
What I found to work awesome is doing incline movements on 1 day and flat movements about 4 days later. I have been doing that for about 4 weeks now and my chest is getting bigger and bigger, never had a problem with chest though
(best body part). Granted I'm taking a shitload of anabolics my bench has been sky rocketing lately and I'm loving this new routine!
 
Juiceman said:
What I found to work awesome is doing incline movements on 1 day and flat movements about 4 days later. I have been doing that for about 4 weeks now and my chest is getting bigger and bigger, never had a problem with chest though
(best body part). Granted I'm taking a shitload of anabolics my bench has been sky rocketing lately and I'm loving this new routine!
Click to expand...


I could never get my incline close to my flat bench and this has been helping a bit. For instance I could never incline more than 250 for 8, now I'm doing 300 for 6 which is pretty decent, still not where I want it by any means but I think this split has definately helped me out!
 
Incline dumbells do it for me, that's for sure. I was a barbell-aholic, but recently I've just been doing one heavy working set of both flat and inclide barbell, then I go to moderate range (5-8) of really slow, really disciplined, and really deep dumbbell presses. I think it's an awesome routine for me. I get to overload my muscle and keep my bench high by doing 3-4 (w/ assist on last ones) of heavy weight and then switch it up to a better chest developing exercise. I'm actually expecting to see strength gains soon. My stabilizers are improving drastically!! That should hopefully help me overcome my sticking-point.
 
IMO when i notice a part of my chest falling behind, then i train that area first. For example I am personally not happy with my upper and inner chest area, this sems like a difficult area for me to build mass. So I begine my routine with incline BB presses, then do incline DB presses, flat bench then fly's. I Have never done decline presses because the flat bench and fly's hit the lower chest as well. So in short if you have a lagging area, work it first before any other chest area. I have no opinion on which builds the chest better, your routine is built around you, so genetics, and personal preference and comfort are what build chest, tailored to your body not someone elses.
 
i never used to do much pressing with db's. i just thougth you should do the exercises with which you can use the most weight like flat bench bb and incline bb.

since i first read this thread a couple months ago i've started using db inclines and i really love them. i've noticed more hypertrophy in my chest overall as well as strength improvement in the flat bench bb and military press, for which i am also doing db presses now.
 
I've found that in my experience, ALL are great variations and ALL actually rank higher or lower for effectiveness depending upon (and this is an important aspect) what ones have been used recently. Simply, if I've been working heavy incline BB presses for a strength cycle, switching over to flat BB or DB movements for the next will surely show improvement on those lifts in that my anterior delts have had more asked of them from the incline cycle. After a cycle of flat chest work, I'll focus on a cycle of heavy weighted dips to recruit more tricep (indirect) in that chest movement. A short cycle of decline presses (major tri involvement) next will allow to have the recent improvment in tricep muscular and neural function put into place in a pressing movement. So, in my quest to improve my chest's overall development, ALL of the exercises and their variations play a major role in the success of the ones to follow.

EDIT: This variety is great however, one must train with purpose, not just mix things up for the sake of doing it either. Like I said, each exercise I select has a purpose, mainly, it is part of a much larger macrocycle really lasting months.
 
bench cable press. horizontal adduction all the way --> resistance all the way+ multiaxial loading--> more hypertrophy
 
Supinated cable flies. Almost pulls the delts out of the move completely. Almost all pecs, and a nearly constant resistance (cables).
 
ZackMurphy said:
Supinated cable flies. Almost pulls the delts out of the move completely. Almost all pecs, and a nearly constant resistance (cables).
Click to expand...
if you love youre subacromial bursa and your shoulder as a whole you'll lose this one, as it puts the shoulder in a very unhealthy position (max internal rotation + abduction) unless you are VERY flexible i your shoulder. and I mean VERY

also, when you start internaly rotated you start with a shorter pectoralis.
 
judge-mental said:
if you love youre subacromial bursa and your shoulder as a whole you'll lose this one, as it puts the shoulder in a very unhealthy position (max internal rotation + abduction) unless you are VERY flexible i your shoulder. and I mean VERY

also, when you start internaly rotated you start with a shorter pectoralis.
Click to expand...
That's interesting. I had thought about the advantage/disadvantage of each of the related muscles (in trying to TRULY isolate the pecs), but didn't think much of joint and bursal sac issues. Hmm.
 
ZackMurphy said:
That's interesting. I had thought about the advantage/disadvantage of each of the related muscles (in trying to TRULY isolate the pecs), but didn't think much of joint and bursal sac issues. Hmm.
Click to expand...
I see no point in isolation unless for rehab/prehab or perturbed motor patterns. you wan to recruit the chest? load more weight. triceps/delts fatigue first? flys/pullovers, wide 1 and quarter bench etc are the answer.
 
judge-mental said:
I see no point in isolation unless for rehab/prehab or perturbed motor patterns. you wan to recruit the chest? load more weight. triceps/delts fatigue first? flys/pullovers, wide 1 and quarter bench etc are the answer.
Click to expand...
Well, ignoring the injury issue for the time being, the point of pec isolation was quite simply to hit the pecs without letting the anterior and medial delts or triceps weasel in on the action.

I love compound movements, but I also like isolation to pre-exhaust or for a general change of pace. And since all other pec movements heavily recruit anterior delts (at least) and most recruit some medial delt and/or tris, the supinated flys serve a purpose.

I appreciate your input.
 
ZackMurphy said:
Well, ignoring the injury issue for the time being, the point of pec isolation was quite simply to hit the pecs without letting the anterior and medial delts or triceps weasel in on the action.

I love compound movements, but I also like isolation to pre-exhaust or for a general change of pace. And since all other pec movements heavily recruit anterior delts (at least) and most recruit some medial delt and/or tris, the supinated flys serve a purpose.

I appreciate your input.
Click to expand...
pullover/decline fly= no delts. try it.
 
vafla said:
pullover/decline fly= no delts. try it.
Click to expand...
Well, you're right about no delts, but pull overs recruit some triceps, and some lats. And the decline fly - yeah, that's more iso than most. I don't have a decline at home, but you're right about the movement itself. Probably a small amount of anterior delt, but less than a flat fly, bench press, or any other arm adduction.
 
ZackMurphy said:
Well, you're right about no delts, but pull overs recruit some triceps, and some lats. And the decline fly - yeah, that's more iso than most. I don't have a decline at home, but you're right about the movement itself. Probably a small amount of anterior delt, but less than a flat fly, bench press, or any other arm adduction.
Click to expand...
pullover = no tricpes (pronated grip)
decline fly= absolutley no delts, unless youre skeleton and muscualature is not human.

nice thing about pullover is it aslo brings up you intercostals, pretty muscle IMO
 
judge-mental said:
if you love youre subacromial bursa and your shoulder as a whole you'll lose this one, as it puts the shoulder in a very unhealthy position (max internal rotation + abduction) unless you are VERY flexible i your shoulder. and I mean VERY

also, when you start internaly rotated you start with a shorter pectoralis.
Click to expand...
Sorry for the delay - haven't been online much. I was going to come back to this faster but got sidetracked.

I don't know much about the bursa and the fluid sac there - is that what you're suggesting would take a beating from this movement? Why? Except for the supination, it's not different from any pec fly.

The way I'm doing this move, I start fully abducted, supinated grip, and I keep the grip supinated. No elbow bend. So there's no real internal rotation. At least not the way I'm picturing it. :think:

And I agree you'd start with a shorter pectoralis major if you began the movement internally rotated, but you're not - your arms are out like a regular fly, just supinated. If anything, the supination should lengthen the pectoral slightly.

You know? Enlighten me. Thanks.
 
just like a regular fly just supinated? youre arms are spinated in a regular fly.

man i thought you meant pronated earlier cause that would get the front delts out and that was your purpose.

suppinated is palms up --> regular flys
 
judge-mental said:
just like a regular fly just supinated? youre arms are spinated in a regular fly.

man i thought you meant pronated earlier cause that would get the front delts out and that was your purpose.

suppinated is palms up --> regular flys
Click to expand...
Just like a regular fly, but with the palms fully supinated.

Regular flyes, 99/100 guys have their palms facing inward, toward each other. Usually slightly supinated at the start, then not supinated at all. Most guys. You may do them differently, but you'd be the exception to the rule.

This variation is most easily done with a cable crossover machine, laying on a bench on the middle with the pulleys at bench height. You can use any handles that are comfortable, and lead with your elbows. Most flyes you'd do the "hug the tree motion". Not these. These, you finish the motion with your lower arms parallel to each other. This removes the medial delt almost completely, and puts the anterior delt in a position where it really can't help much. Consequently, you don't need to use much weight.

You cannot do these with DBs. You MUST keep the palms fully supinated the whole time. It's essential. But the movement hits the pecs in a way unlike anything most guys have ever felt. You can do them VERY light - 10-20# max, and you'll feel your chest in a whole new light.

But having the palms pronated would still allow anterior and medial delt recruitment. You'd still get pecs, of course, too.

Anyway, I'm always interested in potential chronic issues, but I didn't really see a problem with this one.
These were not my idea. A trainer in Utah I know advocates a number of interesting movements to isolate previously un-isolatable groups (lats, pecs), and damned if they don't work. Not that we should ONLY be isolating - just a movement to augment a chest routine. Try it - if you do it right, you'll be amazed.

Any thoughts?
 
ok lets get this straight
suppination happens in the elbow
external rotation happens in the shoulder
so suppiantion in terms of flys is meaningless if you want to be exact
the question is if your shoulder is externaly rotated (you can answer by "palms facing X")
 
judge-mental said:
ok lets get this straight
suppination happens in the elbow
external rotation happens in the shoulder
so suppiantion in terms of flys is meaningless if you want to be exact
the question is if your shoulder is externaly rotated (you can answer by "palms facing X")
Click to expand...
Yes, supination happens at the elbows, but it's evidenced by the postion of the palms, so I reference the palms. But supination, when full, DOES impact the upper arm slightly. At least, it slightly turns my upper arm along with my lower arm. Yours, too, I would imagine.

In terms of the adduction of the arm, the supination has little overall impact, but it changes the physiology of the ability of the deltoids to contribute to the motion, since they're now at a mechanical disadvantage. Much like when the biceps brachii takes a back seat during hammer curls (with the palm mostly or totally pronated). It just can't help as much as with the pronation as it can with the palms supinated. Same thing here, but it pulls the deltoids out of the mix.

Anyway, my point is simply that with the supination, you decrease the ability of the delts to help. And THAT, in turn, amps up the pec impact.

Know what I mean?

Truly not trying to be argumentative - I love this stuff, and I'm thinking out loud as much as I am typing it out.
 
so are you palms facing each other? facing your head? your legs?...

still didnt get it.

external or internal rotation...
 
judge-mental said:
so are you palms facing each other? facing your head? your legs?...

still didnt get it.

external or internal rotation...
Click to expand...
In the normal pec fly position, but supinated, so palms facing my "up", my head.

And the flexion isn't a rotation - it's just adduction. Just like a traditional pec fly.
 
damn you'd flunk any biomecanics course. your shoulder is maximaly externaly rotated

anyway I got you. you dont get the deltoid out, you just make it work harder.

I don't want to continue beating this to death. if your going straight sidewais I see no injury in the horizon but imbalance looming

just do a regular fly
 
judge-mental said:
damn you'd flunk any biomecanics course. your shoulder is maximaly externaly rotated

anyway I got you. you dont get the deltoid out, you just make it work harder.

I don't want to continue beating this to death. if your going straight sidewais I see no injury in the horizon but imbalance looming

just do a regular fly
Click to expand...
WTF.

You're misunderstanding what I'm saying about the rotation - of course you start the motion in an externally rotated position, but you don't internally rotate it at all during the flexion/extension. That's why I'm saying there's no rotation. But I appreciate your taking the time to throw out the insult anyway.

Whatever, man. Sorry to have bothered you.
 
hmmm
that was in a freindly manner, because I didnt seem to get to you. take it easy.

lets go over anatomy:
horizontal adductors (agonists in flys) - anterior delt, pec
external rotation in shoulder - both relatively being( as they are internal rotators) stretched and in a dissadvantage. thus both work harder.

suppination and external rotation go hand in hand but do not equal each other.
 
I like doing dumbells on a swiss ball :) You need to really work hard to stabilize those bitches, and it hits your chest REALLY hard.
 
i hear ya bro,if not carefull the 1st time you do these you will end up with a dumbbell in your face.excellent for stablizer work.
 
meh, i benched for yrs, and never really got a huge chest. I did gain a lot of strength though.
But, when i started doing bench cable cross overs, and flat dumbell press/inclined dumbell presses, my chest just started kinda growing over a period...really impressive.
I'd rather those than barbell benches any day of the week...
 
MaNiaK flyes....about to hit the hay so I might come on here tomorrow to explain but I explain in detail in my pic section and on NP.com in the exercise forum!
 
I really like Weighted Dips, leaning forward to isolate more on the chest. It also will help you get your max up on the bench press. Just my 2c
 
Ha boy this is an old thread. Kinda funny the first two posters are both banned from anabolicminds LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top