interesting OPINION to consider
i know for a fact that most people are idiots.
Oh man, let the controversy begin! I'm in just to see what people are going to argue about on this one.
if you are doing IF and are still eating junk, you are still eating junk. if you are doing IF and still eating too much, you are still eating too much. its not really that hard to figure out but after being a trainer for 9 years and now in IT for over 8 i know for a fact that most people are idiots.
blood isn't in you're stomach helping your food digest it's in your muscles where it should be.
Oh man, let the controversy begin! I'm in just to see what people are going to argue about on this one.
Works well me. I dont pigout....the author does not appear understsnd the diet. Maybe that is why he had problems. Glad he is ok now.
I have a cheat meal about once a week. Caffeine helps surpress hunger. I follow IF about 1/3 of the year during cuts only....not a big deal.
I've been on IF 1 year now. used it on a bulk and a cut worked great for me since i have a busy lifestyle. Isn't IF the lifestyle itself and not the actual diet? because you can do IF and carb cycle as your diet. and BTW while i was bulking on IF i stayed pretty leaner than the bulk attempts i've tried before
Works well me. I dont pigout....the author does not appear understsnd the diet. Maybe that is why she had problems. Glad she is ok now.
I have a cheat meal about once a week. Caffeine helps surpress hunger. I follow IF about 1/3 of the year during cuts only....not a big deal.
Wait..SHE?
That changes everything.
Yep, the author's name is Dani Shugart.
Just binged her, she happens to be quite attractive.
Statements like this have always been an issue for me. I heard this years ago about drinking some protein during my workout. A guy i knew from high school with crazy genetics but no knowledge of nutrition and a mediocre knowledge base of exercise told me "you shouldn't drink that during your workout, it takes blood away from your muscles". So there's not enough blood in your body to maintain multiple systems at the same time? Don't your muscles get even a minimal amount of "pump" during lifting depending on weight, rep, and set scheme no matter what's in your stomach? Isn't this pump created by increased blood flow? Isn't there an ever growing body of evidence that pre and intra workout protein (and depending on the study carbs) helps increase anabolism, and decrease catabolism, while helping to keep cortisol in check, increase exercise endurance, and decrease workout fatigue? Aren't these all things we want to get bigger and stronger?
i have seen similar studies talking about that. i was under the impression that the water to pro/cho amount was small. if memory serves me correct optimal intake keeps the volume as low as 8% of total fluid intake and your body thinks its a liquid and digests quickly and does not pull much if any more blood from elsewhere to absorb whats in the stomach. kind of like how gatorade and similar products are. for the amount of fluid the nutrients are low but just enough to have a positive effect.
but, i could be wrong. would not be the first time i have misremembered something.
Works well me. I dont pigout....the author does not appear understsnd the diet. Maybe that is why he had problems. Glad he is ok now.
I have a cheat meal about once a week. Caffeine helps surpress hunger. I follow IF about 1/3 of the year during cuts only....not a big deal.
I think the author perfectly understands the diet. There are people who can consumer the same number of macros within a short feeding window; there are others, me included, who either pig out and consume far more or eat far less thinking that it will aid in more fat loss. What tends to happen with these people is that the feeding window continues to shorten as does the number of calories, which my case fell to 1000 - 1200 kcals a day, whilst maintaining the same volume of exercise. After a couple of monthsI developed chronic stress and destroyed my metabolism which took a long time to recover. All the author is saying is that this way of eating isn't for everyone due to its psychological impact and for certain individuals can have a devastating effect on their physiology.
I think the author perfectly understands the diet. There are people who can consumer the same number of macros within a short feeding window; there are others, me included, who either pig out and consume far more or eat far less thinking that it will aid in more fat loss. What tends to happen with these people is that the feeding window continues to shorten as does the number of calories, which my case fell to 1000 - 1200 kcals a day, whilst maintaining the same volume of exercise.
After a couple of monthsI developed chronic stress and destroyed my metabolism which took a long time to recover. All the author is saying is that this way of eating isn't for everyone due to its psychological impact and for certain individuals can have a devastating effect on their physiology.