Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Anavar or Original Superdrol

hafele79

New member
Contemplating between the two.

Background - 29 years old. Lifting for 13 years. First cycle of anything was Epistane about 6 months ago.

6'1" 230 Lbs.

Bench: 350
Squat: 425

Goal when I plan to take something in a few months: strength / cut.

Since I have been lifting for so long without quitting, I'm generally as strong as my buddies who take AAS. Having said that, I do want to run something...

I'm worried about cholesterol levels and BP.

I did ok on Epistane as far as BP and lipid levels go.

Thanks for your opinion.
 
For strength and cut, anavar. For it's lack of sides and harsh effects on the body, anavar. My choice is anavar:D
 
jminis said:
For strength and cut, anavar. For it's lack of sides and harsh effects on the body, anavar. My choice is anavar:D
Click to expand...

Can you be a bit clearer?

OG Superdrol is potent, for sure...but I agree - lack of sides is important as it's hard to get maximum benefit when you feel like total ass.
 
since youve been doing it so clean all these years it would probably be in your best interest anyway to keep it a clean cycle which anavar would top superdrol in that catergory.
 
dsade said:
Can you be a bit clearer?

OG Superdrol is potent, for sure...but I agree - lack of sides is important as it's hard to get maximum benefit when you feel like total ass.
Click to expand...

Sure CHOOSE anavar:thumbsup: Var is the best oral available. You can eat like a horse gain LBM and lose some fat as long as your not eating sloppy. Oh and did I mention the vascularity? Sick
 
Agree with Holy on this one. Other then minimal fat gain you cannot really expect a whole lot (or this rat didnt get a whole lot) from var. But like jminis said vascularity with var is on another level.

If you worried about cholesterol then without a doubt use var. My lipids looked fine after numerous havoc cycles, but with one little SD clone cycle HDL was trashed.
 
Royd The Noyd said:
Agree with Holy on this one. Other then minimal fat gain you cannot really expect a whole lot (or this rat didnt get a whole lot) from var. But like jminis said vascularity with var is on another level.

If you worried about cholesterol then without a doubt use var. My lipids looked fine after numerous havoc cycles, but with one little SD clone cycle HDL was trashed.
Click to expand...

var is terrible on your cholesterol too....not that sd is any better tho
 
Thanks so much for the information - it's great to have a place where you get informed answers without all the bs that comes with so many boards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top