ALRI's new phermone...

SJA, I know exactly what you are saying. I have made the same argument on numerous occasions. Just from the initial write-up on the Lea's site, I thought it was rather obvious that this substance was a AAS. By "Dark Side," I meant the use of AAS.
 
Here is the thing, I was going to hold off on its release till the summer. Everyone loaded up on anabolics in the last months so there really was no need to release another one right now. I thought I would try and save everyone some money till the summer rolled around.

If its the pheromone I have been working on for 8 months, then its not found in beef and unless it is tweaked a certain way it has no anabolic or androgenic activity at all. Since ALR is not releasing the structure, neither will I, but let me say if done right it is very potent. Without knowing which one it is, its hard to really say anything with proff, but I would advise PCT with it and hopefully he has modified it correctly.
I dont think its as good as M1T or SD but its still good. Its also not as clean as SD or M4OHN. I am going to get on my chem house to start production, they have been waiting for me to do it for almost 8 months now, so Ill get going.
 
I think someone should buy a bottle and have its content analyzed by a lab.

I'm pretty sure that is a designer steroid and they dont want that people realize that hence to alert the FDA.
 
size said:
ALRI has one product that contains phosphatidylserine that is unique since so few companies even deal with PS. Also, ALR wrote the book "building the perfect beast".


You are talking about IMPACT which I have used twice now. At $45, it might not be for everyone, but its a great product none the less.
 
gizzle said:
You are talking about IMPACT which I have used twice now. At $45, it might not be for everyone, but its a great product none the less.
Any way to use it transdermally?
It sounds really good.
 
XxCrisisxX said:
SJA, I know exactly what you are saying. I have made the same argument on numerous occasions. Just from the initial write-up on the Lea's site, I thought it was rather obvious that this substance was a AAS. By "Dark Side," I meant the use of AAS.


I see. :cheers:
 
it depends on which compound it is, without knowing that, its a guess. I know it wont be as strong as M1T or SD so keep that in mind. If you have a good stock of Phs, then i wouldnt rush to get this. If you have stock, wait a couple months or until he release the compound name which is unlikely.
 
Syr said:
Any way to use it transdermally?
It sounds really good.

Its made for IM injection. The only downside is the ethyl alcohol, but it only hurts for a day or so. Compared to H.M. Gear its much more easier to tolerate, don't know why. I have been using it with their 6-0x0 product called Max-OxO-Plus. I'm bouncing back nicely, plus I can see fat loss as well.
 
...this is interesting. Look forward to more info for sure. With the money-back guarantee, and the props given to ALRI by trusted sources here, I might give it a go.

SJA- noticing some bloating in the avatar. And is that "roid rage"? Maybe mix in some letro and a little phenibut with the Thunderbird!
 
gizzle said:
Its made for IM injection.
Its pretty clear from the way its presented on the website ;)

phosphatidyl serine should have a good oral bioavailability... I'm going to suggest a product to Sledge... :)
 
Designer Supps said:
Since ALR is not releasing the structure, neither will I.....


Do you think this is really wise? If it works, how long do you think it is before someone tests it and publishes the results on a board. I seem remember that it was not long before someone (wonder who) tested and posted the exact chemical structure of SD (by identifying the begenning of the structure) on one of the boards.
 
Seems ok to keep things "proprietary" as much as necessary for self-protection. Of course there will be info eventually, and copycats.The problem with so many other "proprietary blends" is that they contain rediculously small/ineffective ratios of otherwise good compounds, basically rendering them worthless unless you consume an entire bottle in 3 days.
 
milwood said:
...
SJA- noticing some bloating in the avatar. And is that "roid rage"? Maybe mix in some letro and a little phenibut with the Thunderbird!

I'll give that a try. Maybe when custom gets his site rolling, I'll make up my own brew for the rage...call it.....PhenLetro-Thunder from Omega :drunk: :icon_lol:
 
How bad is suppression from this type of product (Sledge should have some idea)? I was wondering if this could be used during the first two weeks of PCT, but I am thinking not.
 
there is somebody taking this stuff in vpx forum and he says that his mojo is way up and so is his strength.
 
Designer Supps said:
Since ALR is not releasing the structure, neither will I, but let me say if done right it is very potent.

I have a pretty good "guess" as to what it is. ;)

Your points (about potential toxicity and no suppression of T) are pretty valid I'd say.
 
So if it is what sledge thinks it is, it has little to no suppression of T, is moderately powerful, and is pretty toxic? What would a good dosage be for this, and minimum and maximum effective cycle lengths?
 
I think youll need PCT, it may not suppress to bad for a very short cycle, say 2 weeks, but if used for 8 weeks I seriously doubt that there will be no shutdown. I could only give dosing info based on my compound, I have no idea which one he is actually using. ShadowJack I think youre on the right path...
As I said before, if you have M4OHN, Superdrol, M1T or MDHT there really is no rush to get this or use it. That was the reason why I was holding off, when everyone starts too run out of what they "could" have in storage, is really when you would need it. By ALR releasing this so early he is bringing a lot of attention to an area that didnt need any, especially right now.
There are serious flaws with this compound when it comes to delivery, orally it has no activity, without it being methylated. If he is methylating it, then you should know that it can be toxic.
I understand the reason for not wanting to release the structure, it sucks to spend so much time on something, pay the highest price to have it made special and then 2 months later someone else releases it cheaper because the chem houses now have a synthesis for it. But if its toxic, you should know, if you need PCT, you should know that too.The chinese are going on holiday for the next 2 weeks, so its unlikely youll see this within the next month.
 
SJA said:
What exactly is the "dark side"? When someone says "all natural", it is increasingly becoming a joke because they are always asked to "explain" what it means.
A hundred years ago, you still grew or killed your own food....that was "all natural". Nowadays, as stated, vegetables and meats are injected with chemicals to optimize growth. We bodybuilders ingest processed food powders (artificially substituted food substitutes) along with the onslaught of creatines, NO products, thermogenics...etc....etc....etc. The last time that I checked, I wasn't getting 3 grams of CEE from a rare steak or 3 grams of B5 from a piece of salmon (you know...for those times when acne is flaring up). When is the last time you picked a protein bar from a tree or shrub? Or plucked some Doritos from your garden?
I can also remember a time when taking PH's was still considered "all natural" because the definition really equated to "all legal". Since the ban of ephedra and now ph/ps and the looming "no unadulterated supplements" ban, the definition is becoming greyer and greyer.

Derek has kept "all legal" and PH/PS/AAS free. I've watched him toy with the idea of "joining the dark side" in the legal sense (PH/PS) a couple times but he's chosen to stay out of the androgen loop. With his genetics I think that he naturally has high test/GH levels anyway. I'm sure that he hates explaining himself every time someone questions his questions because it's a difficult question to answer "I thought you were all natural". I've seen people ask this before and the person being asked really doesn't have a leg to stand on other than "all legal". So if Derek wants to try a phermone to get some chicks and it happens to make him an even bigger freak....then more power to him :icon_lol:

Bravo my man!
 
NickW said:
How bad is suppression from this type of product (Sledge should have some idea)? I was wondering if this could be used during the first two weeks of PCT, but I am thinking not.

Moderate to severe suppression, don't use during PCT. Good anti-e but also pro-DHT. 20mg is effective (it's strongly anabolic but quite androgenic unfortunately)
 
It truly is a joke, my thought has always been if you cant go into a grocery store in nowhere arkansas and buy it on the shelf, its not natural. But I also dont care, I have met plenty of people who were "all natural" and used GH, T3 and Clen.
 
DR.D said:
Moderate to severe suppression, don't use during PCT. Good anti-e but also pro-DHT. 20mg is effective (it's strongly anabolic but quite androgenic unfortunately)


Why do you say this?

Do you know the ingrediant?

and if you do know the ingrediant, people have been saying it is useless in oral form.

Your advice seems too detailed and accurate, when none of us know the exact ingrediant. Or even whether it is methylated, or has an ester attached.

Could you explain a little more about this?
 
TheTom said:
Why do you say this?

Do you know the ingrediant?

and if you do know the ingrediant, people have been saying it is useless in oral form.

Your advice seems too detailed and accurate, when none of us know the exact ingrediant. Or even whether it is methylated, or has an ester attached.

Could you explain a little more about this?

If it's the pheromone that Sldg asked me to evaluate, and it sure sounds like it, then I do know all about it. I don't think I'm allowed to talk about it yet, but I have already tested it and am familiar with it's chemical, physical and biological properties. Even if Sldg decides to keep the active as 'proprietary' and not release the structure right away, I'll say that it's a novel substance and very strong. I will let everyone know the proper warnings, PCT, and cycle plan when he is ready to release it. It would be irresponsible to just release it and say good luck or tell you it doesn't suppress if it does. Rest assured that I will give you straight info on it's proper use as someone who has already taken that risk and is qualified to asses the possible consequences of it's use. Or, this may be a completely different product so it's all just speculation as of now.
 
DR.D said:
If it's the pheromone that Sldg asked me to evaluate, and it sure sounds like it, then I do know all about it. I don't think I'm allowed to talk about it yet, but I have already tested it and am familiar with it's chemical, physical and biological properties. Even if Sldg decides to keep the active as 'proprietary' and not release the structure right away, I'll say that it's a novel substance and very strong. I will let everyone know the proper warnings, PCT, and cycle plan when he is ready to release it. It would be irresponsible to just release it and say good luck or tell you it doesn't suppress if it does. Rest assured that I will give you straight info on it's proper use as someone who has already taken that risk and is qualified to asses the possible consequences of it's use. Or, this may be a completely different product so it's all just speculation as of now.
dr.d - any stacking advice? if i'm gonna do a cycle and be suppressed and do PCT - i'm gonna make the most of it. especially with a new product. (on that note - many thanks to testers who try compounds solo!)
 
blank! said:
dr.d - any stacking advice? if i'm gonna do a cycle and be suppressed and do PCT - i'm gonna make the most of it. especially with a new product. (on that note - many thanks to testers who try compounds solo!)

Well, I can't make claims for an unknown product that I have no affiliation with. Size said earlier that he trusted the company and the products that they make. I really trust Size, plus I've never used that company's products, so I won't pass judgement until I know better. All I will say is you will need a real PCT and 10-20mg is a good starting dose, IF it is what I suspect it to be.
 
Hey, thanks for the answers DR. D, but you didn't answer the one that matters.

Patrick Arnold is saying that this base compound has zero activity when taken orally and only a few %'s when it is attached to an ester (also taken orally).

To me this seems completely worthless unless methylated... right?

and from what I've seen other Guru's post. It shouldn't be any stronger than the PH's we already had on the market.

So if we are getting 3-5% oral activity once an ester is attached and only taking 20mg, AND it's probably not as powerful as 4ad mg/mg...

Then this should be a extreme waste of money, shouldn't it?

We would be taking 20mg of something (esterfied) that is less powerful mg/mg than 4ad, where 4ad is usually taken in 600mg-1gram doses?

How is an esterfied 20mg going do ANYTHING for a person?

From what I've theorized above, taking 20mg of this (hopefully esterfied) pheremone, would be the same as taking 5-10mg of esterfied 4ad.

Which wouldn't do anything whatsoever, not even begin to supress you.

----------------------------

So here are my questions...

1: Is this pheremone more powerful than 4ad mg/mg?
2: Will we get enough oral activity from this compound in BASE or ESTERFIED form, to make a difference?
3: Is this type of compound only worth a damn when it is methylated?
 
TheTom said:
Will we get enough oral activity from this compound in BASE or ESTERFIED form, to make a difference?... Is this type of compound only worth a damn when it is methylated?

I know nothing more about the product than anyone else, but I do not believe that ALR would release a worthless product. ALR (like Designer Supps) has an excellent reputation. Therefore, I would certainly expect this product to be effective. It would be illogical for such an individual to release a "junk" product. However, I too would like to know specifically what it includes and possible side effects.
 
DMT? Dimethyltest?

Size - I asked them via email and got the same generic response posted on page 1 of this thread. I think someone close to Rea will have to release it, or get it tested.
 
TheTom said:
Hey, thanks for the answers DR. D, but you didn't answer the one that matters.

Patrick Arnold is saying that this base compound has zero activity when taken orally and only a few %'s when it is attached to an ester (also taken orally).

The free alcohol is LT 100% of test & the acetate is in the 150% range, but that would be trans or IM, orally it would be nothing too spectacular. Maybe I read the ad wrong, I thought it said 1200% comp to MT, that would def be the methylated version. Like I said, I haven't tried the product. But I can testify that Sldg's stuff is potent. About 33% stronger that SD, but it has an edge to it. Kinder on the mood, amazingly, but a hard core androgen too, so much "dirtier" than SD. I can see a lot of guys really liking it though. If you like the hardcore stuff like MDHT and 3a,b-Diol, then this will be a real treat, because it's more anabolic that any comparable androgen out there and still about 2x as androgenic as MT. But please remember, it's a pheromone, so when I use terms like 'anabolic' or 'androgenic', I'm speaking in a relative way. I'm sure Sldg is marketing his product specifically to help you guys score with the ladies, and nothing more, so don't ask too many more questions right now. I think ALR played their cards a little too soon, we'll see what happens.
 
I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Thanks for the great info. Dr. D.

Looking forward to Sledge's stuff... going to have to pass on ErgoMax though.
 
TheTom said:
So here are my questions...

1: Is this pheremone more powerful than 4ad mg/mg?
2: Will we get enough oral activity from this compound in BASE or ESTERFIED form, to make a difference?
3: Is this type of compound only worth a damn when it is methylated?
name one methylated hormone that is worth a damn w/o the 17aa, in similar doses.
 
blank! said:
name one methylated hormone that is worth a damn w/o the 17aa, in similar doses.

There are some, but they are not commercially available, yet. It is rare, but you are going to start seeing some very weird products now with the ban, so some of the old rules are going to disappear. God willing, I am hoping to have some say in this. Sldg is a great guy, he has entertained all my ideas so far.
 
Im not ruling out anything for the future. The only I problem I have with ALR and this product is that if its toxic, the user should know. I think he played his cards too soon as well, a mistake I wont make.
 
jmh80 said:
DMT? Dimethyltest?

Size - I asked them via email and got the same generic response posted on page 1 of this thread. I think someone close to Rea will have to release it, or get it tested.
DiMethylTryptamine and away we gooo! wooohooo :D ... this thread sorta strikes me as insane, might aswell mention hallucinogenic drugs, mystery pheremones that promote muscle growth through mysterious means marketed to men to help attract ladies? well I hope they work like SD :P
 
size said:
I know nothing more about the product than anyone else, but I do not believe that ALR would release a worthless product. ALR (like Designer Supps) has an excellent reputation. Therefore, I would certainly expect this product to be effective. It would be illogical for such an individual to release a "junk" product. However, I too would like to know specifically what it includes and possible side effects.
I found this collection of articles by Invalid Link Removed on bb.com. There's a couple of pics of him as well.
 
i think im goin to try this , one bottle before i try SD so i can let everyone kno the results
ive been ph free for 2 1/2 mnths so i should respond quick if this stuff is any good
 
D_town said:
Is that an offer?

Yeah, right! Me too. I already have chrom and physicals on Sldg's, send me a bottle and I'll assay it. At least I could say what it isn't and might be.
 
DR.D said:
Yeah, right! Me too. I already have chrom and physicals on Sldg's, send me a bottle and I'll assay it. At least I could say what it isn't and might be.
Do you really need a whole bottle to assay it?
If it is DMT as speculated this could be very risky for all involved. Various agencies are claiming it as a designer steroid ala THG. Here's one article though I'm sure you've alll heard about it by now.

Scientists find new designer steroid

Duncan Mackay
Wednesday February 2, 2005
The Guardian

Scientists at the World Anti-Doping Agency have discovered a new designer anabolic steroid designed specifically to evade drugs tests, fulfilling the prophecy made last year by Victor Conte.
The founder and owner of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, who allegedly distributed the first designer anabolic steroid tetrahydrogestrinone or THG, had claimed a new drug was already in production. "You think it's over just because they've indicted me?" he had said. "Please. There's a new version out there right now."

His claim has been confirmed by the identification of another hitherto undetectable substance called desoxymethyltestosterone (DMT). The new steroid would have a similar impact to testosterone if used, increasing strength, muscle bulk and stamina.

"Following the THG story, this is the second designer steroid we have found," Wada's scientific director Olivier Rabin said from Montreal. "We believe this was created purely for doping in sport."

Just as in the discovery of THG, officials were alerted to the existence of this new drug by a whistleblower; this time it was an anonymous emailer who alerted Wada to the seizure. Wada and professor Christiane Ayotte, the head of the Wada-accredited laboratory in Montreal, worked with Canadian customs scientists who had seized it at the border with the United States last July to determine that it was a new form of performance-enhancing steroid.

Ayotte said retests of stored urine samples taken from athletes in recent months showed no trace of the drug and she believes it was caught before it went into general circulation. "This puts us ahead of the dopers," claimed Rabin.

The new drug is the most complex substance yet discovered by testers and is several generations ahead of THG. Even officials expressed an element of admiration at the cleverness of its creation. "THG was a modification of gestrinone [a female fertility drug] by a simple one-step reaction," Ayotte said. "But in this case we know, because we exactly reproduced the way they made this product, that it is at a level of sophistication that we have not seen before.

"We now have chemists with a very serious organic chemistry background helping these people distribute these things to athletes."

Because this synthetic steroid lingers in the liver without breaking down, however, it is potentially highly damaging. "They used chemicals that are very dangerous," said Ayotte. "They are highly flammable when exposed to the air and toxic. There was no purification."

The discovery of this new drug indicates that THG was almost certainly the result of sustained development and not just the invention of an amateur scientist who got lucky. "This proves that THG was not a one-off," said Rabin. "This new substance has been discovered so quickly after THG because we learned some lessons from the THG story. This shows them how serious we are."

The cloak-and-dagger contest between the testers and rogue scientists is increasingly fascinating.

Many are returning to steroids manufactured nearly 50 years ago to try to fool the testers. By altering the pharmacological make-up of some drugs it is possible to avoid them showing up in tests or sometimes the substance is so old that they have simply been forgotten.

Such a case happened in 2003 when Dr Don Catlin, the head of the Los Angeles Wada-accredited laboratory, suspected that Tammy Thomas, an American cyclist who had won a silver medal in the 2001 world championships, was using illegal drugs but was perplexed by her test results.

After some research Catlin discovered she was using norethandrolone, a drug developed in the 1960s to help undersized men but never released after inconclusive clinical trials. Thomas was banned from cycling for life.

Catlin and Ayotte are at the forefront of the fight against doping in sport. It was Catlin who identified and developed a test for THG and now Ayotte has struck another blow.

The source for the manufacturer of these illegal drugs is suspected to be laboratories in China or India. The FBI uncovered evidence during its investigation into Conte that THG started life at a plant in Hangzhou, China, where it is easy to obtain all the raw materials needed to make designer steroids. It is probably a similar story with DMT.

"The universe of these people is large," said Catlin. "The world is big. Who knows what goes on in the nooks and crannies?"
 
ersatz said:
Do you really need a whole bottle to assay it?
If it is DMT as speculated this could be very risky for all involved. Various agencies are claiming it as a designer steroid ala THG.

Various agencies like who? Your right, one wouldn't require much to test it, but if that's what it is, I'll keep my hands off. The numbers they gave were a bit high if it's really DesoxyMT and not what I was thinking. Thanks for the heads up.
 
Back
Top