Here's the thing - WADA statements don't apply to you because you're not a tested athlete. They don't apply to me because I'm not a tested athlete. But I do work with athletes who are tested athletes.
I explained to you in great detail that no, it is not on the WADA banned list, but that no one can tell you what the vague clauses on the WADA list could be interpreted as - because they are intentionally vague. One WADA examiner may even disagree with another one over what those clauses mean.
I explained WADA in so much detail to you that an athlete that reads here but doesn't post, who I had never communicated with before, pm'd me and said that I should take those posts and turn them into an article to help people that are WADA tested understand WADA better.
You said that you're not a WADA/NCAA athlete, and I along with others in this thread explained to you that normal everyday people don't use those guidelines to determine if they're natural - if they did, then every woman in the country that uses Colostrum is doping
So after all that - when you post -
are you saying they would be able to use 78 benzoflavone and that's why it wouldn't worry them? (talking about WADA athletes I work with) << No, I didn't say that. I told you in great detail several times already that the ingredient is not specifically banned but the WADA list is intentionally vague. And that's what made it seem like you were trying to make some type of 'Gotcha' type thing because after hours of my time going into explaining something to you, you said that.
You've used things I would absolutely never use from a quality and compliance standpoint and things that if you gave me for free, I'd throw in the trash, and things that if a WADA athlete asked me if they could try, my answer would be absolutely hell (fill in the blank with about every cuss word I can think of) no.
That's why I don't understand the length that you're going to to worry about 7,8-Benzoflavone.
I hope that makes sense.
