The guy has freakish physical ability. I haven't seen a RB with that many physical tools since Bo Jackson or even Christian Okoye. I've been actively watching football since 1987 so don't crucify me if I left someone out.
Good post, he is amazing.A guy that can set the NFL rushing record on a team without a QB or a deep threat? Thats insane.
Teams can stack 8 men in the box against him all day and not get burned by a passing attack. They still cant stop him. Urlacher and Merriman both said it wasn't that they werent in the correct defensive scheme to stop him, they just could not physically stop him.
A guy that can set the NFL rushing record on a team without a QB or a deep threat? Thats insane.
Teams can stack 8 men in the box against him all day and not get burned by a passing attack. They still cant stop him. Urlacher and Merriman both said it wasn't that they werent in the correct defensive scheme to stop him, they just could not physically stop him.
We havent been this excited in Minnesota since Randy Moss left. Now all we need is a QB and on decent WR to go with Wade and Sidney Rice.
Packers did some damage.
Personally I think he is the best athlete in the running back position since Bo. But sometimes I feel like he is doomed to suffer the same fate - catastrophic injury cutting his hall of fame potential short.
Just too big, too fast and too explosive - something has to give.
Problem being that Peterson has been known to be injury prone... is this just the beginning?
Problem being that Peterson has been known to be injury prone... is this just the beginning?
Edit: Oh and IW, sorry about your 9er's last night. I was really pulling for them. RIP Richard Nolan
A guy puts his helmet on your knee at the moment you are making a cut back. OF COURSE you are going to get hurt.
This isnt the beginning of anything except bad luck and a cheap hit.
It's easy to speculate now but RB is a tough position to play so there will be injuries regardless of how good you are. I think Barry Sanders and Curtis Martin are the only 2 great RB's that lasted 10 years with little or no damage. Just too much physical punishment and it catches up sooner or later. I saw a special on Earl Campbell and how fvcked up he is now due to the punishment he took with the Houston Oilers and it was quite the eye opener.
A guy puts his helmet on your knee at the moment you are making a cut back. OF COURSE you are going to get hurt.
This isnt the beginning of anything except bad luck and a cheap hit.
Thats not a cheap hit. He's a RB not a QB that just stepped up into the pocket and let the ball go. DB's and smaller LB have to go low to tackle a physical freak like Peterson.
I hope thi injury isn't one that lingers, he could do some damage.
Thats not a cheap hit. He's a RB not a QB that just stepped up into the pocket and let the ball go. DB's and smaller LB have to go low to tackle a physical freak like Peterson.
I hope thi injury isn't one that lingers, he could do some damage.
Yes a cheap hit. Quite the genius eh?
It's easy to speculate now but RB is a tough position to play so there will be injuries regardless of how good you are. I think Barry Sanders and Curtis Martin are the only 2 great RB's that lasted 10 years with little or no damage. Just too much physical punishment and it catches up sooner or later. I saw a special on Earl Campbell and how fvcked up he is now due to the punishment he took with the Houston Oilers and it was quite the eye opener.
A guy that can set the NFL rushing record on a team without a QB or a deep threat? Thats insane.
Teams can stack 8 men in the box against him all day and not get burned by a passing attack. They still cant stop him. Urlacher and Merriman both said it wasn't that they werent in the correct defensive scheme to stop him, they just could not physically stop him.
We havent been this excited in Minnesota since Randy Moss left. Now all we need is a QB and on decent WR to go with Wade and Sidney Rice.
ahem Emmit Smith :thumbsup: My take on this is that yes he is a freak but does anybody else remember in previous years when every one and their mother was saying Lt, Larry Johnson, Priest Holmes, Edgerrin James, Jamal Lewis etc... and how they were the next incarnation of Jim Brown or Eric Dickerson. I mean all these guys are very good running backs but the longevity just isn't their anymore I mean the average lifespan on a rb these days is 4 years.
ahem Emmit Smith :thumbsup: My take on this is that yes he is a freak but does anybody else remember in previous years when every one and their mother was saying Lt, Larry Johnson, Priest Holmes, Edgerrin James, Jamal Lewis etc... and how they were the next incarnation of Jim Brown or Eric Dickerson. I mean all these guys are very good running backs but the longevity just isn't their anymore I mean the average lifespan on a rb these days is 4 years.
If he can stay healthy - and that's a big if - I believe he has the potential to be one the best to ever play the position. He is simply an amazing athlete. But it's hard to stay healthy in this sport, and with his history of past injuries... Only time can tell.
But he is definitely the real deal and I look forward to watching his performances for as long as he's around.
These are not signs of chronic injuries such as pulled muscles, they are bones breaking and ligaments tearing. If someone hits you in a bad way your bones and ligaments are only made to give so much. Hamstring/Joint/Groin problems would indicated he is injury prone.
I disagree because it suggests structure is not as tough as his muscles are strong/fast. Plus he is big, energy is mass * acceleration. His body produces a massive amount of energy that possibly his frame cant contain.
AP has a small-frame, and explosive musculature, much like a bodybuilder. Many bodybuilders were formally freakish sports stars who were too frequently injured.
I hope they sit him a couple more weeks. Id rather have him play 12 games a year for 10 years than 16 games for 5 years.
You did not even address his injuries in your "argument". Like I said, his injuries are all freakish occurances and nothing can prevent a bone from breaking or tendon from tearing that part of your body his hit perfectly so it has to bear all of the force.
And once again, you are not a doctor. Brad Childress is one of the most conservative coaches in the NFL and would not do anything to jeopardize AP or his coaching career. I think he will be fine playing this week.
By definition a 'freak occurrence' is an improbable and infrequent event. When a single individual succumbs to a successive amount of 'freak occurrences' one logically sees a pattern. In AP's case, a pattern of minor injuries, suggesting a less than structurally integral frame.
CNorris, any info on the dislocated shoulder? This is something that does NOT heal and will be a chronic problem even with surgery. If this is correct, then he'll be at risk every single play.
A broken collarbone can heal and an ankle can be braced and taped up. These 2 should NOT be problems for the rook.
The way you described the LCL sprain sounds nasty to me. Backs HATE to wear knee braces that provide medial and lateral stability unless they're a North/South bruiser.
So far, I really enjoy watching his running style. I'm just trying to be an objective NFL fan looking in from the outside.
Your philosophical reasponse does not address the facts at hand.
What makes it improbable and infrequent is the fact that you see people diving into end zones all the time without breaking collar bones. How many people break collar bones in football? Does AP have brittle bones? I doubt it if he was able to last in the NFL without breaking any other bone than one of the most bones that one of the more improbable ones to break.
Also a person diving from behind and from the side and puts his helmet on your knee the second you make a cut is a freak occurance.
Sure there is a pattern developing, a pattern of freak occurances, but when the injuries are looked at individually none can suggest they have ANYTHING to do with the biology of the player.
And your deliberate ignorance and contemptuousness prevents you from seeing the 'facts' you are attempting to expound in the first place.
I am not sure what is the inherently difficult aspect of the definition of 'freak occurrence' you are having trouble grasping. If he were to jump into the endzone and break his collar bone, decontextualized from the rest of his injuries, therein you could classify that as freak. And that is your issue, decontextualization. Many things can be misconstrued once you remove them from context. If you forget all of AP's other injuries, you're right, he is not injury prone. However, they did occur, and as such, they add that cantankerous little constituent of reality you hate so much, context. Which allows us to properly frame the actions of an individual within a totality, which, crazy I know, I like to call reality. Welcome to it.
I used to enjoy watching the 2 or 3 years that Robert Smith tore up the league too. ... he was good on ESPN this morning if it's any consolation? :lol:
Nah seriously, I like AP and that vid is totally kick a$$. But CNorris, he's totally injury prone and you're in complete denial bro.
MulletSoldier, I am thoroughly impressed by your vocabulary... no joke bro wow :head:
Are you also impressed by his ability to use those big words without making one valid argument? I am. It reminds me of reading a philosophy book.
Denial? No, you just haven't thought it out enough.
I already clearly explained why he is unfortunate and doesn't have some anatomical flaw that results in AP having suffered his injuries.
Well, by your use of the terminology 'Philosophy book' I'll take an assumptive leap of faith you have not read many. The argument is there, and completely valid. AP is injury prone, and your completely denial of that allows us to ascribe a few positive qualities to you:
a) you're retarded
b) you're disagreeing for no other purpose besides being cantankerous, contemptuous, and inflammatory
c) you cannot read and/or interpret spoken language.
My degree is in engineering... cold hard facts. I have read some philosophy in lib ed classes enough to know it makes me want to go back to even the worst engineering class.
I did ride the short bus once but only because it was the after school activity bus.
I am disagreeing with you because I am right.
I can interpret spoken language fine, but I don't know how to read spoken language.
Cnorris puts up a good argument. I think we'll know for sure within the next 2 years if AP is really injury prone. The injuries he's sustained have been somewhat freakish, not typical of someone that's "injury prone". Maybe I'm using a bit of wishful thinking, because I think AP is the best since Barry Sanders(totally different style, but). Don't believe the hype. Stick to the CFL, Mullet.
Reading and interpreting spoken language are not mutually inclusive properties. The 'and/or' conjunction delineated an exclusive separation, though strong agreement, between the two properties. I realize your 'engineering' degree more than likely did not assist in your reading comprehension skills, so may I suggest a more linear manner of posting for yourself?:
a) read post
b) consider it
c) read again
d) realize you are CNorris and have the comprehension of my kid brother's pet rock
e) read once more
f) post.
Nice attempt on the burn though, ass.