Guest viewing is limited

About time to disassociate Peptides from Anabolics

956Vette

Member
Is it about time the AM forum properly placed the peptide discussion separate from anabolics? (Please place/move topic in forum suggestions if more appropriate)

My belief is that IGF-1 analogs, HGH/etc are indeed non-anabolic substances worthy of special treatment

Appreciative of any help arranging all the helpful content :cool:
 
LOL. define how INSULIN is not an ANABOLIC substance?

anabolic is NOT only steroids, there is anabolic substances carbs. in fact carbs are the most anabolic substance period. and Insulin has the highest anabolic rating out of any steroid (test/deca/tren/dbol......).
 
GLHF said:
LOL. define how INSULIN is not an ANABOLIC substance?

anabolic is NOT only steroids, there is anabolic substances carbs. in fact carbs are the most anabolic substance period. and Insulin has the highest anabolic rating out of any steroid (test/deca/tren/dbol......).

Agreed with the slin thing
 
GLHF said:
LOL. define how INSULIN is not an ANABOLIC substance?

anabolic is NOT only steroids, there is anabolic substances carbs. in fact carbs are the most anabolic substance period. and Insulin has the highest anabolic rating out of any steroid (test/deca/tren/dbol......).

Agree. Anabolic only means "muscle building"
 
LOL. define how INSULIN is not an ANABOLIC substance?

anabolic is NOT only steroids, there is anabolic substances carbs. in fact carbs are the most anabolic substance period. and Insulin has the highest anabolic rating out of any steroid (test/deca/tren/dbol......).

Very few sir google search peptides in search of insulin - get w/ the program - of course slin is the MOST anabolic (maybe it should have it's own dangerous advocacy forum)
 
Agree. Anabolic only means "muscle building"

Yes, and guess what GLHF - no doctors will go before court and claim HGH/GH peptides => muscle building

my point still stands

sure seems wasteful the over-paying sponsors for peptides here get minimal visibility
 
I'm not sure who's right here. On one hand, hgh is anabol, insulin as well. But on the other, just hgh alone is worthless. You need testosteron, t3 AND slin to make a real anabol environment. So is it really worth to call hgh alone anabol?
 
foxpharma said:
I'm not sure who's right here. On one hand, hgh is anabol, insulin as well. But on the other, just hgh alone is worthless. You need testosteron, t3 AND slin to make a real anabol environment. So is it really worth to call hgh alone anabol?

You can run HGH all by itself. No need for Test or T3. Insulin obviously works hand and hand with HGH but i personally wouldnt mess with it. Personally though when $ is right I want to stop doing deca and Tren compounds with my Test and run HGH for a year with 12-20 week Test-E cycles on top of that.
 
You can run HGH all by itself. No need for Test or T3. Insulin obviously works hand and hand with HGH but i personally wouldnt mess with it. Personally though when $ is right I want to stop doing deca and Tren compounds with my Test and run HGH for a year with 12-20 week Test-E cycles on top of that.
x2, foxpharma tends to type too much (imho w/ much respect helpful brotha!) - personally I would not be interested in mixing slin or thyroid hormone as HGH is great on its own (YET NOT ANABOLIC, LOL) - thanks for your added .02!
 
956Vette said:
x2, foxpharma tends to type too much (imho w/ much respect helpful brotha!) - personally I would not be interested in mixing slin or thyroid hormone as HGH is great on its own (YET NOT ANABOLIC, LOL) - thanks for your added .02!

No problem I'm bored lol. I will stop confuse you with my wicked plans...
 
Back
Top