Guest viewing is limited

17a hydroxy-pregna-1 4-diene-3 20-dione

well its a synthetic derivative of the natural progestational hormone 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone

I dont see it having any use in bodybuilding and it probably has substantial progestational activity, which would mean it would be suppressive to the hpta
 
So any "bold" precursor has zero bodybuilding benefits?
 
the stuff i got is actually called pro-eq, but same ingredients. i wanted something to stack with my halodrol that was non-methylated.
 
bossman523 said:
the stuff i got is actually called pro-eq, but same ingredients. i wanted something to stack with my halodrol that was non-methylated.
Click to expand...
Interesting compound. I wonder how well it converts to eq. Stano is pretty good non-methylated to stack with hdrol.
 
hvactech said:
So any "bold" precursor has zero bodybuilding benefits?
Click to expand...


The step for side chain cleavage is not gonna happen to much extent outside of the adrenals and leydig cells so the amount of bold formed from it would be miniscule

couple that with the fact that it might be suppressive then i have to say that the net effect would probably be negative

this is almost like taking progesterone in order to raise testosterone levels. seriously
 
For anyone that chooses to use their brain consider this

17a-hydroxyprogesterone would convert to testosterone as this converts to boldenone

17a-hydroxyprogesterone has a long history of being given to pregnant women 250mg a week (as the caproate).

If there was conversion of any significance to a bodybuilder than you would have babies born with virilization. This is not the case


The evidence is strongly against this stuff being of any benefit, and strongly for it being counterproductive
 
I just researched this a bit more and i may have been a bit premature. 17a-hydroxyprogesterone caproate apparently does not hydrolyze so it wouldnt be expected to be able to metabolize to testosterone.

The question is, will the amount of conversion be worth the amount of suppression
 
Patrick Arnold said:
I just researched this a bit more and i may have been a bit premature. 17a-hydroxyprogesterone caproate apparently does not hydrolyze so it wouldnt be expected to be able to metabolize to testosterone.

The question is, will the amount of conversion be worth the amount of suppression
Click to expand...

Do you know to what extent it will surppress? Time to look up some studies instead of paying attention in chemistry class =D
 
Interesting, ive been using pbold for a few weeks now.....
 
EatMoar said:
Do you know to what extent it will surppress? Time to look up some studies instead of paying attention in chemistry class =D
Click to expand...


I am trying to figure this out for 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (since it is actually studied). So far cant find anything on males and LH

It appears though that orally its significantly androgenic though, so there is conversion to androstenedione for sure
 
Patrick Arnold said:
with all the options why would you take this stuff?
Click to expand...

I didnt buy it, and i received 4 bottles.. Most reviews seem positive so i figured why not try it.. It is taurus's brand but pro-eq from lg science had decent beta reviews as well
 
hvactech said:
I didnt buy it, and i received 4 bottles.. Most reviews seem positive so i figured why not try it.. It is taurus's brand but pro-eq from lg science had decent beta reviews as well
Click to expand...
is this oral or topical?the dose just seems too tiny to be of any benefit. the stuff converts to boldione and boldione itself is known to be useless at 20mg a servingcorrect me if i am off base here
 
Patrick Arnold said:
is this oral or topical?the dose just seems too tiny to be of any benefit. the stuff converts to boldione and boldione itself is known to be useless at 20mg a servingcorrect me if i am off base here
Click to expand...

Im using 8ml a day, so 120mgs, its sublingual...
 
u probably are better off going oral.

plus since 120mg of boldione does pretty much notihing, i wonder how you expect 120mg of boldione precursor to work

or maybe you just like the way it tastes
 
Patrick Arnold said:
u probably are better off going oral.

plus since 120mg of boldione does pretty much notihing, i wonder how you expect 120mg of boldione precursor to work

or maybe you just like the way it tastes
Click to expand...

I wasnt sure what to expect honestly....either way you feel its not worth it?
 
What would say is the ideal "hundreds of mg"?
 
I'm pretty disappointed that this isn't a viable bold alternative. I loved the original bold ph. I'm still pissed they banned it.
 
SBH said:
Interesting compound. I wonder how well it converts to eq. Stano is pretty good non-methylated to stack with hdrol.
Click to expand...

i was actually gonna get some furazadrol but they didn't have any at the place i went to buy it. i think i am going to get a debit card so i can start buying online. it's cheaper and more options.
 
bossman523 said:
i was actually gonna get some furazadrol but they didn't have any at the place i went to buy it. i think i am going to get a debit card so i can start buying online. it's cheaper and more options.
Click to expand...

I believe its banned
 
it says in that ad that progestin based hormones are active on their own. that is correct, they are active as progestins. not exactly a great marketing point
 
Would reaction of this compounds with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid give you androstenedione and androstadienedione
 
Patrick Arnold said:
is this oral or topical?the dose just seems too tiny to be of any benefit. the stuff converts to boldione and boldione itself is known to be useless at 20mg a servingcorrect me if i am off base here
Click to expand...
Boldione needs a hell of a lot more than 200mg, let alone 20.
 
Wish there still was a legit bold pro hormone available like eq plex.
 
Is there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you? Lol
 
JD261985 said:
Is there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you? Lol
Click to expand...

That's why doing research on the compound is essential.
 
flightposite said:
Wish there still was a legit bold pro hormone available like eq plex.
Click to expand...
Why? That **** kinda sucked IMO.
JD261985 said:
Is there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you?
Click to expand...
If someone is lying to you and manipulating you, do you REALLY need to ask if there's a reason to trust them? Or are you that dumb?
 
Beejis60 said:
Why? That **** kinda sucked IMO.

It was pretty mild. But it treated me very well. Zero sides, nice strength boost, appetite increase, good consistent lean mass gains, great mood, and my joints felt fantastic.
Click to expand...
 
JD261985 said:
Is there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you? Lol
Click to expand...

i ask myself this every day
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top