Guest viewing is limited

Winstrol (Stanozolol) to treat high Progesterone

ECTOmorph

ECTOmorph

Member
I didnt even know that Stanozolol (Winny) was a prescription medicine, but anyways I see that it can bind to the progesterone receptor much like clomid or nolva would w estrogen receptors.

Has anyone heard of it use as this?
 
Now there is evidence that Winny does indeed bind to the progesterone receptor(1) and its users do not indicate the normal characteristics of progesterone stimulation, which bodes well for these anti-progestagenic properties. There is also some clinical data that it does aid in symptoms that require progesterone suppression(2)

Invalid Link Removed

(1) Ellis AJ, Cawston TE, Mackie EJ., The differential effects of stanozolol on human skin and synovial fibroblasts in vitro: DNA synthesis and receptor binding., Agents Actions 1994 Mar;41(1-2):37-43

(2) Brestel EP, Thrush LB., The treatment of glucocorticosteroid-dependent chronic urticaria with stanozolol., J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988 Aug;82(2):265-9


The use of Winstrol is also an effective method of controlling progesterone-induced gyno, as it is anti-progestagenic. An effective dose appears to be in the vicinity of 50mg eod (depot) or 30 to 35mg/day (tabs) although this dose may require increasing depending on the doses being employed in the stack.

Invalid Link Removed
 
I know it is prescribed for anemia and I have never heard it used in TRT. I know that it can wreak havoc on the lipid profile and that's probably a reason why it isn't used.

Sonny
 
Stanazolol is an illigal anabolic steroid. We adhere to discussions strictly pertaining to the legal application of male anti-aging medicine and testosterone replacement in this forum. Your question belongs in a different forum.
 
MMAFIGHTER said:
Stanazolol is an illigal anabolic steroid. We adhere to discussions strictly pertaining to the legal application of male anti-aging medicine and testosterone replacement in this forum. Your question belongs in a different forum.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure it is legal under prescription...

Invalid Link Removed
 
T800 said:
I know that it can wreak havoc on the lipid profile and that's probably a reason why it isn't used.

Sonny
Click to expand...

It comes as injection as well, but you'd have to inject it about everyday.

the pills are liver toxic, but less so than most methyl's, taking liver protectants (milk thistle, nac, ect) you can easily go AT LEAST 8 weeks without messing w the lipid profile.
 
MMAFIGHTER said:
Stanazolol is an illigal anabolic steroid. We adhere to discussions strictly pertaining to the legal application of male anti-aging medicine and testosterone replacement in this forum. Your question belongs in a different forum.
Click to expand...

winnie is legal with perscription i know atleast 6 people witha perscription for it, he isnt breaking any rules he is refering to it in a legal way
 
bigschmidt821 said:
from my understanding yes, one of them worked under me.
Click to expand...

Thats crazy! I couldn't imagine my Dr. giving me an Rx for Winnie (Not that I would complain of course)! I am sure though that this would have long term consequences such as messed up lipids.
 
I really dont think Winstrol would "wreck" the lipid profile as long as you kept the "cycle" short and took proper liver precautions...
 
Hyde12 said:
This is why I wish the Dr's in the states had some sort of DHT replacement. .
Click to expand...

We do. Its called compounded testosterone.

Apply a little extra to your balls and watch that DHT skyrocket.

And yes, there is no safer and better way to combat progesterone than with a little extra DHT.

On another note, sky high progesterone is a big reason why so many had issues on propecia. No DHT = Sky high progesterone.
 
plymouth,

is there any way to use propecia where it won't mess you up? I have heard that there can be deleterious effects from the drug (that may even be unerreported?) because it lowers DHT. But if you're on TRT and your DHT increases, couldn't it be useful then if you're worried about hairloss while underoing TRT?
 
plymouth city said:
We do. Its called compounded testosterone.

Apply a little extra to your balls and watch that DHT skyrocket.

And yes, there is no safer and better way to combat progesterone than with a little extra DHT.

On another note, sky high progesterone is a big reason why so many had issues on propecia. No DHT = Sky high progesterone.
Click to expand...

The thing about compounded T cream/gel is that it also can covert to E2. Does applying it to the balls make a difference on weather it convert to E2 or DHT?

Also there isnt any type of DHT treatment in America? No DHT creams or anything of the like?
 
rick055 said:
plymouth,

is there any way to use propecia where it won't mess you up? I have heard that there can be deleterious effects from the drug (that may even be unerreported?) because it lowers DHT. But if you're on TRT and your DHT increases, couldn't it be useful then if you're worried about hairloss while underoing TRT?
Click to expand...

Propecia problems stem from DHT bottoming out.

Doctors past, present and probably in the future still aren't intelligent enough to figure this out.

All one needs to do is to safely monitor DHT levels via BW.

Those on HRT have this benefit.

Let us not forget all the other benefits of propecia - it acts on the 5 alpha enzyme

Not only does it prevent balding, it can protect the prostate as well, and probably treat urinary symptoms.

I see no reason why it can't be safely used if one is closely monitoring hormone levels, DHT in particular.
 
fit4life05 said:
The thing about compounded T cream/gel is that it also can covert to E2. Does applying it to the balls make a difference on weather it convert to E2 or DHT?

Also there isnt any type of DHT treatment in America? No DHT creams or anything of the like?
Click to expand...

This is no difference in one using shots or a transdermal.

The effects of shots vs transdermal are minimal.

One needs to take steps anyways to combat excess estrogen.
 
plymouth city said:
This is no difference in one using shots or a transdermal.
The effects of shots vs transdermal are minimal.

One needs to take steps anyways to combat excess estrogen.
Click to expand...

I thought that:

#1. Transdermals promote raise of DHT leaving E2 practically unchanged

#2. Shots promote E2, leaving DHT practically unchanged
===============================================

I have been for years on transdermals, not using AI but with sky high DHT
June 19/2007 I changed to shots
Today I draw blood, should have results in week or two.
Base on above understanding, when switching to shots I added 0.5cc liquidex/E3D
so far I feel like it was good decission.
 
Well DHT is going to lower E2 either way, so even if it did raise it, it would lower it at the same time... If that makes sense. I wouldn't worry about E2 w/ DHT, it will go too low if anything.
 
JanSz said:
I thought that:

#1. Transdermals promote raise of DHT leaving E2 practically unchanged

#2. Shots promote E2, leaving DHT practically unchanged
Click to expand...


That is exactly what I have observed. My E2 doubled on shots (before arimidex), and DHT remained unchanged. During the same period test went up 50%.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top