But do you notice he was quoted as saying it has no merit, now he's using it? Regardless of the intent, he's using it! Lets just end the hypocrisy and guise of legitimate skepticism is all I'm saying. If you don't think it has a sound scientific mechanism for your specific application, just don't do it then. Please don't come over here defending a couple of insincere jerks though, that already know the answers to their own questions before they ask them.
I haven't seen that quote, but if its true then I agree with you that PA is way off on this one. The actives in your product that I'm familiar with certainly do improve the oral bioavailability of certain drugs. Whether this includes all AAS I honestly don't know. I have seen a few studies which include anavar and deca, which would support your claims of increased oral AAS absorption. This will also improve the oral bioavailibity of many stims (including caffiene) as well as many other prescription/OTC drugs.
That said, I stand by my statement that these guys were attacked unjustly. They were doing what I hope every supplement consumer does, question the products that they are purchasing. Good supplement companies can provide solid scientific backing to their products...not bash those who question them. I understand that peer reviewed journal articles regarding the use of this type of product with designer steroids will be non-existant, but there should at least be a legitimate study of a similar compound to compare. What I saw were a few guys asking for this type of verification...with only hostility in return.
You may label me as a PA "cronie" if you wish, but I think that I deserve much more credit. I have the utmost respect for the leaders in this industry (which includes PA, Sledge, Par Deus, WL, and Dr. D) but I think that every product that any of them put out should be questioned by the consumer. Following blindly will help no one.