Invalid Link Removed
Remember it was Republican Senator Arlen Spector who slammed Gonzales the hardest in the hearings a couple days ago and who appears to be backing this idea the most.
Hey remember when Bill Clinton fired EVERY US attourney...
...an unprecedented act by a president?
Invalid Link Removed
Hey remember how Clinton was President seven years ago, the issue is THIS administraion, you know the one that's in power right now? Hey remember how the issue is Gonzales' lying to the Senate, in addition to the firings?
If Gonzales did lie, I am not going to defend him. If he did lie, the democratic trap worked just as planned. Any lie was very stupid because there was no need to. All US Attourneys serve at the will of the president, and he can fire them for political reasons if he chooses so. If the left wing press paid attention to history this drummed up fake scandal wouldnt have even been covered. Thats why Clinton is relevant.
Gonzales should have admitted for firing US Attourneys for not prosecuting people unless they had over a pound of marijuana. He should have admitted to firing them because their political differences caused them to not enforce the law. At least they didnt fire them to stop an investigation on the PRESIDENT HIMSELF. IE WHITEWATER.
Oops! True to your teachings, you just pulled that fact out of your arse. Reagan did the same thing Clinton did. Doesn't unprecedented mean...aww nevermind.
I forgot something. Clinton fired all but one, Michael Chertoff. Chertoff was only spared because powerful Democrat Bill Bradley requested he not be fired. What was unprecedented is the fact that Reno fired and accepted the resignations of all but 1 US Attourney at the same time before their replacements were even named. Reagan fired 89 of the US attourney over a longer period of time without leaving districts with current investigations in limbo for months at a time.
Therein lies the problem, both Reagan and Clinton did more or less a clean-sweep upon entry into office, and it was seen as typical partisan behavior. But when selective terminations are done well into a second term, suspicions arise that people are being shut up. And that's what the congress is trying to do, find out what happened. However, Gonzales and others are not being cooperative, as we see over and over with this administration. So don't come with the tired Bill Clinton BS.
Here Reagan did it too, straight from your own Kool-Aid factory:
FOXNews.com - Attorney General Gonzales: I Acknowledge Mistakes Were Made in Firing of U.S. Attorneys - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum[/url
Did Reagan fire someone investigating an illegal land deal he was a apart of, and replace them with a former studen of his? Did Reagan fire them all at once without replacements named? Did Reagan fire them for political differences, or because of his own criminal baggage he brought into the office? Did Bush do any of those things? Clinton did. People were being shut up in his "Clean Sweep". If Bush is relevant, then putting his actions into historical perspective by bringing up Clinton is relevant. This whole investigation is just one giant dog an pony show meant to appease the radical left wing base and smear Bush's name in the mud. Shouldnt congress be doing something else. Say... like passing laws that improve this country?
Clinton had such a stranglehold over the judicial and law enforcement apparatus of the country that the communist Chinese illegally funneled more than $10 million to help his 1996re-election campaign.
This must be why Congress' approval rating is as low as the average winter temperature in Alaska.
I like Arlen Spector. He seems to have a lot of integrity and seems to be one of the few senators who can't be bought easily.
Invalid Link Removed
I think Bobo is correct. BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome) definately exists. Gonzales, Cheney, and Snow are some of the more notable patients. What it appears to be is a syndrome of thought derangement that all under Bush's power exhibit.
You make it sound like pork is only a problem on the left. :whiner:
Oh btw, the record shows more filibusters for non-war related bills so your "15 times" doesnt really ring true.
And you make it sound like filibustering is only a Republican thing when your own Mike Gravel is the poster boy.:study:
As those who defend Clinton always say "We're talking about now, not then"
![]()
I'm not defending Clinton or the filibuster when used by democrats. You can keep changing the topic all you want but you arent refuting the facts. LOL...I dont even know if Gravel has been in office since I've been alive![]()
Either way, I'm done involving myself in these stupid debates. Its clear that people who dont think or share the same views with the conservative right are obviously wrong and bad for this country. Although i do give you credit, bobo, for not having to resort to pathetic name calling like Norris.
Hey remember when Bill Clinton fired EVERY US attourney, an unprecedented act by a president?
The real truth is though, no one gives a flying **** about the attorney firings. That's just something some Democrats think they can nail some high level people in the adminisrtation for. Kinda like how they nailed Al Capone on tax evasion.
Invalid Link Removed for Republicans, Bush, and America. That and no Republican will publicly back him , not even on Foxnews!
So?
I can't believe Fox News would say that. Didn't they get the memo that they are supposed to blindly follow a right wing point of view? Thats it...where is Rupert?
Vote fraud and intimidation is present on both sides. The absolute desperation in 2004 of liberals was hilarious. Their nation wide anti bush propaganda campaign failed to get them the poll numbers they were looking for, and they were far more likely to commit fraudulent voting acts during that election.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
So, they "cheated" to lose ? Well, I'm in deep on the conspiracies, but this seems odd.
Bush won by 3 million votes in the 2004 popular election, and Democrats acting like the 2004 election was stolen from them is just a desperate and pathetic act.
I am sure you are familiar with the electoral college and how it works, so just imagine in the very controversial State of Ohio election results what would have happened if Kerry had won that state's electoral votes?...that's what the Gonzales thing is all about. Invalid Link Removed
Its 2007, time to recover from your Post Election Selection Trauma and move on with your life.
So, they "cheated" to lose ? Well, I'm in deep on the conspiracies, but this seems odd.
I hope this inst an attempt at a counter argument. So you are saying that only the winner of an election can be capable of cheating?
I am sure you are familiar with the electoral college and how it works, so just imagine in the very controversial State of Ohio election results what would have happened if Kerry had won that state's electoral votes?...that's what the Gonzales thing is all about. Here this chart may help.
What would have happened is a president that lost by the largest margin ever would be in the white house. And this Gonzales thing has absolutely nothing to do with vote fraud, except in your make believe world of 911 conspiracies, new world order take overs and big bad evil republicans out to control the entire world. No one that references a web site like Prison Planet has an ounce of reality in their thought process.
CnorrisI've taken Lorazepam , Diazapram and Xanax
No one that references a web site like Prison Planet has an ounce of reality in their thought process.
Those drugs are mild sleeping medications
For someone to be as delusional as you and believe in your Alex Jones prison planet bull sh1t, there is no way you havent had your fair share of LSD in your life time. That must explain your altered sense of reality.
Those drugs are mild sleeping medications I took during school when I was taking 16-20 credits of senior and graduate level engineering courses. I'm sure you don't understand stress since the only college courses you took were in Philosophy. I have never tried a harsher drug than Marijauana. For someone to be as delusional as you and believe in your Alex Jones prison planet bull sh1t, there is no way you havent had your fair share of LSD in your life time. That must explain your altered sense of reality.
So, you took benzos as a study aid ?
Invalid Link Removed
Lorazepam is in a group of drugs called benzodiazepines (ben-zoe-dye-AZE-eh-peens). Lorazepam affects chemicals in the brain that may become unbalanced and cause anxiety.
Lorazepam is used to treat anxiety disorders.
Invalid Link Removed
Clumsiness or unsteadiness; dizziness or lightheadedness; drowsiness; slurred speech
Less common: Anxiety; confusion lack of memory of events taking place after benzodiazepine is taken mental depression
Cnorris Invalid Link RemovedHardly a study aid. It impairs your thought process, but unlike you I can take the hit. It was a sleep aid that has far fewer side effects than any OTC sleep medication available. Melatonin and Tylenol PM both are far more impairing.
Lorazapan is a far less potent drug than Ambien, Lunesta and supplements from companies supported by this board. It is prescribed by doctors specifically as a sleep aid very commonly. As are muscle relaxers.
Rem R3G from USP Labs and X Dream from IBE are more potent than any of these drugs. I cant handle Tylenol PM which is why I tried a far less potent sleeping medication that doesn't give me a hung over feeling in the morning.
I've taken Lorazepam , Diazapram and Xanax. All make me tired. X-Dream so far does not even have a remotely similar effect on me. Its tough for me to think of this product as a Benzo.
LSD however causes permanent delusions, paranoia and raging hippy mindset syndrome. If you want to get back on topic go ahead. Until then enjoy your permanently damaged hippy brain from all that LSD you took.
anabolicrhino Answer two questions.
1) Have you taken any hallucinogenic drug.
2) Do you believe in any element of the Alex Jones 911 conspiracy theories.
There is a direct connection between drugs that alter a persons sense of reality and the lack of reality in their thought process. I am trying to understand your delusional mind set.
Have fun with your paranoia induced conspiracy theories.