It is elevated TRH, not TSH, as with primary hypothyroidism, that elevates PRL. TSH will also rise due to TRH stimulation.
If your PRL assays at 2, then sometimes it is at "0". Does that REALLY sound good to anyone?
Either way, preferring a tighter range does not mean we give drigs to alter things well within normal range necessarily.
How does compromising Leydig cell and immune function with PRL that is too low sound?
I think many, even in my field, are too quick to treat "normal" PRL. But who knows where the "normal range" will end up.
I also think many have come to believe treating Adrenal Fatigue is the be-all and end-all, even in the presence of severe hypogonadism. You aren't going to successfully treat Adrenal Fatigue while the guy feels rotten from low T, any more than you can successfully treat depression with concurrent hypogonadism without addressing the low T (which often makes the depression go away).
Thank you for quick response, much appreciated.
My take home, about ranges, if we do not know better we use them.
While making effort at narrowing range we use upper or lower 1/3 or 1/4 laboratory range.
My best guess at the monmet would be that Prolactin would fall in lower 1/4.
range (2-18) would then become (2-6)
============================================
Incidentally if you still follow this thread;
We have some problems when testing Estradiol at Quest.
They have two ulra-sensitives (RIA)(old) and (LC/MS/MS)(new)
Hardasnails had it tested twice
once
Estradiol, Ultra-sensitive (LC/MS/MS)
it show almost no estradiol (<2) when range (<29)
then
Estradiol, Ultra-sensitive
it show his estradiol over the range
Any experience with this ( new) tests.
Noted that only few Quest labs offer those new tests.