understandable...i just don't venture to that board very often...makes my head hurt...
no big deal, i'm sure someone other than 1fast can assure the validity of the lab and it's methods.
It's RTP labs. They are legit, as Mike said.
Mike - good QC does not come from n=1 samples. Statistics can tell one quite useful information.
Sadly, as you mention - the money isn't really there to gather a proper amount of data to do a complete analysis of a lot of whatever supplement.
I'm honestly trying not to pick on you. I have a point with that statement: your lab sample of Epistane is only one data point.
That does not mean your data set is infallible.
I could theorize a ****-ton of ways that result you post is bad data (whether it comes back "on spec" for Epi or "off spec" is immaterial).
I'm good at theories.
Problem is - theories are bullsh*t without a test (as a noted chemical industry consultant - NP Liebermann - says).
What would be a test of any of my theories? More data (i.e. results from RTP labs).
Anyway - just trying to give you (and everyone else) a big picture view.
Your pursuit of data is noble IMO. I like data. I appreciate your efforts (not sure of your agenda in doing so though - but who cares what Jmh80 thinks).
Pissing and moaning on message boards is always easier though.
Just not sure one result really tells anyone of sound mind and body that Epi is off spec.
Looking forward to the data, Mike.
Again - thanks.
Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!