Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

Dumbest humans on Earth...

Invalid Link Removed
 
This has been the goal all along.



Crime or not, that's their agenda.



What do you believe needs to happen if this happens?



We know even Mueller said they can "indict a ham sandwich". I don't believe a single soul here trust the govt.

Too many republicans are essentially place holders for progressives. I don’t see anything happening. For something happening below government level I think things will have to get much worse because going against them is essentially risking your livelihood or life. Local protections is the only thing in their way. Hopefully enough states continue to exercise the 10th amendment.
 
Dump turns himself in at NY Police Station.

Didn’t go as DA Bragg expected.

Invalid Link Removed
 
He got away!

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Invalid Link Removed
That’s facts. No one takes western moral high ground serious who isn’t in the western pole of influence. A lot of us here do not.
 
Uranium shells being sent to Ukraine. Seems like the west wants a war to blame all of our problems on. This is dangerous. We used them in the Middle East. It’s definitely an escalation imo.
 
Dumbest fucks on Earth.



If you are a registered democrat, you are a stupid mother fucker.



How's that for a sales pitch you dumb fucks??



Invalid Link Removed
 
Uranium shells being sent to Ukraine. Seems like the west wants a war to blame all of our problems on. This is dangerous. We used them in the Middle East. It’s definitely an escalation imo.
I guess its old skoo now so why not... the hot new ticket is molten copper rounds. nothing can stop em. give the nazis all the radio active stuff so they can dirty up russia some more? sure why not!
 
Dumbest fucks on Earth.



If you are a registered democrat, you are a stupid mother fucker.



How's that for a sales pitch you dumb fucks??



Invalid Link Removed

This is all part of equity. You can not make people equally intelligent, athletic, beautiful moving the bar upwards; this can only be done by lowering the bar. It’s in everything progressives do. Equity really means moving society to a lowest common denominator. It’s really the only way possible logically. For example I will never be as smart as a Tesla. The only way for equity there is to suppress a Tesla type to my level. Everyone should reject this. Great people raise society, but they are treated as a burden. It is an embrace of mediocrity.
 
China Hits Back at U.S. Criticism of Ukraine Peace Efforts

China on Wednesday (March 22) hit back at US criticism of Beijing’s efforts to push for peace talks to end the fighting in Ukraine as Chinese President Xi Jinping concluded his three-day visit to Moscow.

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters on Tuesday (March 21) that China was not “impartial” due to its relationship with Russia, comments that drew a rebuke from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

“The US says China’s position cannot be seen as impartial. Does that mean pouring weapons into the conflict should be seen as impartial? Does that mean causing the crisis to escalate should be seen as impartial?” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said.

Wang described Xi’s trip to Moscow as a “journey of friendship, cooperation and peace” and called on the US to stop stoking the conflict in Ukraine. “We call on the US to reflect on its own role in the Ukraine issue, stop fueling the flames, and stop deflecting the blame on China. We will continue to stand firm on the side of peace and dialogue,” he said.

Source: Antiwar.com

Forum | Substack | Twitter | Minds

Follow:
@G3News
 
China Hits Back at U.S. Criticism of Ukraine Peace Efforts

China on Wednesday (March 22) hit back at US criticism of Beijing’s efforts to push for peace talks to end the fighting in Ukraine as Chinese President Xi Jinping concluded his three-day visit to Moscow.

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters on Tuesday (March 21) that China was not “impartial” due to its relationship with Russia, comments that drew a rebuke from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

“The US says China’s position cannot be seen as impartial. Does that mean pouring weapons into the conflict should be seen as impartial? Does that mean causing the crisis to escalate should be seen as impartial?” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said.

Wang described Xi’s trip to Moscow as a “journey of friendship, cooperation and peace” and called on the US to stop stoking the conflict in Ukraine. “We call on the US to reflect on its own role in the Ukraine issue, stop fueling the flames, and stop deflecting the blame on China. We will continue to stand firm on the side of peace and dialogue,” he said.

Source: Antiwar.com

Forum | Substack | Twitter | Minds

Follow:
@G3News


I understand that this is a complicated issue....
But China is Definitely not impartial. They probably want what their ally, Russia wants.
Now that Russia has seen that they can't just march in and take the whole country, they are suddenly open to "peace talks'.
You know.... Where "both sides win".

Their idea of both sides winning, is Russia settling for only taking part of their country (for now)... Along with other concessions. .... You know, in the interest of "peace".
They are only willing to settle for less, because they couldn't take All.

Regardless of how anyone feels about Ukraine, what country on earth would want to surrender "only part" of their own country, and independence?
 
Dems are the dumbest fucks on Earth.

Invalid Link Removed
 
I understand that this is a complicated issue....
But China is Definitely not impartial. They probably want what their ally, Russia wants.
Now that Russia has seen that they can't just march in and take the whole country, they are suddenly open to "peace talks'.
You know.... Where "both sides win".

Their idea of both sides winning, is Russia settling for only taking part of their country (for now)... Along with other concessions. .... You know, in the interest of "peace".
They are only willing to settle for less, because they couldn't take All.

Regardless of how anyone feels about Ukraine, what country on earth would want to surrender "only part" of their own country, and independence?

You kinda missed the point. The point is when the west says you can’t attack another country while attacking other countries constantly is a joke to non westerners. When the west try’s to discredit countries for being impartial while consistently being impartial at a higher level it isn’t taken seriously from non westerners. You could go on and on with this type of thing.

The point is the hypocrisy.
 
You kinda missed the point. The point is when the west says you can’t attack another country while attacking other countries constantly is a joke to non westerners. When the west try’s to discredit countries for being impartial while consistently being impartial at a higher level it isn’t taken seriously from non westerners. You could go on and on with this type of thing.

The point is the hypocrisy.

When we invade Canada, or Mexico with the intention of making them ours ..... That will be hypocrisy.
.Perceived hypocrisy, or false claims of hypocrisy (or both) don't necessarily mean something or someone is hypocritical.

We will always have some differences in perception (the West, vs non-Western countries).

I really didn't miss the point.
 
When we invade Canada, or Mexico with the intention of making them ours ..... That will be hypocrisy.
.Perceived hypocrisy, or false claims of hypocrisy (or both) don't necessarily mean something or someone is hypocritical.

We will always have some differences in perception (the West, vs non-Western countries).

I really didn't miss the point.

You are trying to turn this into a moral conversations about “this countries invasions are different than that countries invasions…” it’s irrelevant.

The point is using the term impartial as a grounds to have moral and political superiority while being anything but impartial is pure hypocrisy.

I interjected a couple other examples that could have thrown this off unintentionally.
 
You are trying to turn this into a moral conversations about “this countries invasions are different than that countries invasions…” it’s irrelevant.

The point is using the term impartial as a grounds to have moral and political superiority while being anything but impartial is pure hypocrisy.

I interjected a couple other examples that could have thrown this off unintentionally.

There was a time when this country invaded nobody, and protected nobody.
That turned out badly for everyone.
Isolationism sounds great in theory, but as we've already discussed .... Everyone is Not the same.
 
You are trying to turn this into a moral conversations about “this countries invasions are different than that countries invasions…” it’s irrelevant.

The point is using the term impartial as a grounds to have moral and political superiority while being anything but impartial is pure hypocrisy.

I interjected a couple other examples that could have thrown this off unintentionally.

You're right though ... I answered what you said.
Maybe you shouldn't have said that.

Look man ... You seem like a decent guy, and I don't enjoy arguments anyway....
So we could drop this if you like.
But I won't let my country be painted as something different than what it is.
I never have and Never will.

Let's focus on Biden .... We agree he sucks.

(y)
 
You're right though ... I answered what you said.
Maybe you shouldn't have said that.

Look man ... You seem like a decent guy, and I don't enjoy arguments anyway....
So we could drop this if you like.
But I won't let my country be painted as something different than what it is.
I never have and Never will.

Let's focus on Biden .... We agree he sucks.

(y)

Yea we can agree to disagree. I think for us to understand each others positions would take a much larger conversation than a few posts on the forum. Plus I don’t think we would agree at the end of it. I don’t think anti-war types convince pro interventionists to change or vice Versa very often.

It’s all good. No hate.
 
Last edited:
must see video of the day... 92 yr old smokes a couple of less than desirable thugs with his hands ... hoe-lee-chit!!

Invalid Link Removed
 
TRUMP will be on Hannity, (Fox News east coast time, 9pm and 2am, for the insomniacs ;-) This Monday night for the full hour
 
TRUMP will be on Hannity, (Fox News east coast time, 9pm and 2am, for the insomniacs ;-) This Monday night for the full hour
Hannity is POS and IDK why Trump would give them anything to make money off of. Fek Hannity, Fek the murdoughs and Fek foxnews.

no hate on you brother.
 
My God, the lies get worse. The Dems have set all time records for illegal aliens and have the balls to tell.these lies 🤣🤣🖕🖕🖕



Invalid Link Removed
 
That’s terrible. This time the left will cheer it on and maybe 20 years later it will be used on them. People never learn.

The first red alarm I heard was it had "bi-partisan" support...then I was like damn,, something is up.
 
Breaking:
1400 metric tonz of methanol just spilt into the ohio river.

😶

scorched earth. they are willing to burn it all down to get their way.

sadly we are so paralyzed we just sit and watch it happen unwilling to take to war on their doorsteps.
 
Biden Military is funding and promoting drag queen hour on military bases.



My God I despise this fucking disgusting administration.



Invalid Link Removed
 
Biden Military is funding and promoting drag queen hour on military bases.



My God I despise this fucking disgusting administration.



Invalid Link Removed

There is always some form of degeneracy in leftist priorities. You see it even in their greatest thinkers/philosophers. You tell normal people supporting leftists this and they say “oh no that’s like just that one guy” or “well I don’t support that part” and it’s like no, you do support it and it isn’t one guy.

That is part of why I dislike democracy. I know a ton about like maybe 2 subjects voting effects and it is bc I find it fascinating. What are the chances most people actually deep dive the things they vote for? What are the chances they are swindled by foxes to vote against their own interests?
 
Dumbest people on Earth..

He claims to be literally every race, and ethnicity he is speaking to.
Talk about pandering. What a slobbering idiot. Only one that might be worse is Kamala. No Joe is worse

Imagine you voted for this clown??

Invalid Link Removed
 
Honestly, I don't know what all this encompasses yet. But (especially with all of the ambiguity) it doesn't look good.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Its an insurrection at the Tennessee state capital!!!!

Nothing but a bunch of sheep begging for the state to deduce them into earthworms, begging for their powers to be taken from them. And in the meantime no solutions to the problems they care about.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Its an insurrection at the Tennessee state capital!!!!

Nothing but a bunch of sheep begging for the state to deduce them into earthworms, begging for their powers to be taken from them. And in the meantime no solutions to the problems they care about.

Invalid Link Removed

If they were in any way associated with the right they would be called terrorists.
 
Honestly, I don't know what all this encompasses yet. But (especially with all of the ambiguity) it doesn't look good.

Invalid Link Removed

Nothing to see here. Just the party that complains about their being too many people in jail making more ways to throw people in jail.
 
Yes lmao.



I can't wait to see the backfire on this one...it's gonna be worse then a 1979 Ford pinto 🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230330-180406-630.png
    Screenshot_20230330-180406-630.png
    101.5 KB · Views: 119
...
 

Attachments

  • 1680215154805.jpg
    1680215154805.jpg
    110.5 KB · Views: 107
Back
Top