I agree. I don't see difference on the mirror every week, but some indications, like the ones you mentioned, should be seen at every week or two. I'm guessing unrealistic expectations is what's going on here.Maybe I'm a weird anomaly but when I start a cut, or make alterations during a cut, I typically can see the outcome of that within 4-5 days. So, a drop in bodyweight, decrease in waist circumference, etc. In other words, a drop in bodyfat. If I didn't notice any changes within 2 weeks, I'd know something is wrong (I'm still eating too much).
Lunch: protein shake with egg whites
After Workout: protein shake with egg whites
Dinner: Omelette with 4 eggs
Thats all Im eating mate
On the surface that doesn't seem like many calories at all, assuming your protein shake isn't loaded with oats and peanut butter etc.
How long have you been eating that? And I mean literally that, no cheats, no snacks, etc.
totally random individual independant you will see it when you see it...I am currently at the end of Week 2 for Tren Ace (and Test Prop) for cutting with high-intensity training and an appropriate diet.
I was wondering what week can I start to see decreased body fat percentage?
Sounds like you've nuked your metabolism (just a guess with the information at hand). That's a very weird diet, or at least to me. No vegetables? I can understand going ketogenic, even though I don't like it myself. Keeping enough carbs in when cutting is the most beneficial diet tweak I've made for myself along the years of trying different things.Been doing that for a month or two. NO cheats!
Been doing that for a month or two. NO cheats!
i dont believe you if you have been eating only that for 2 weeks with no results. you are snacking or drinking alot of sugar...Lunch: protein shake with egg whites
After Workout: protein shake with egg whites
Dinner: Omelette with 4 eggs
Thats all Im eating mate
What is your height/weight?
If you've been eating that for a month or 2, you must've seen some weight decrease. Unless you're a midget and eating at maintanence.
My suspicion is IF you've been eating that for 6 or so weeks, diligently, and you lost bodyweight initially, you need a diet break. Making some assumptions, you can't sustain that little amount of calories for "long" periods. Crash diets, where you drop calories intake by a large amount off the cuff, should only be run for short periods (2 weeks or so) and tend to require refeeds.
Sounds like you've nuked your metabolism (just a guess with the information at hand). That's a very weird diet, or at least to me. No vegetables? I can understand going ketogenic, even though I don't like it myself. Keeping enough carbs in when cutting is the most beneficial diet tweak I've made for myself along the years of trying different things.
How is your energy and mood? Have you cut weight before and with this similar diet?
Energy and mood are normal. I have cut with kind of a similar diet and lost 4% bf last year from feb to marSounds like you've nuked your metabolism (just a guess with the information at hand). That's a very weird diet, or at least to me. No vegetables? I can understand going ketogenic, even though I don't like it myself. Keeping enough carbs in when cutting is the most beneficial diet tweak I've made for myself along the years of trying different things.
How is your energy and mood? Have you cut weight before and with this similar diet?
Is there a reason why I have not seen any visual results or decrease in bf?It looks very similar to Lyle McDonalds Extreme Rapid Fat Loss diet where you eat pretty much your daily protein intake and that's it. But it's only intended for 4 day stints lol.
I don't really like eating and thus, I have not been snacking at all or very low consumption of sugari dont believe you if you have been eating only that for 2 weeks with no results. you are snacking or drinking alot of sugar...
Is there a reason why I have not seen any visual results or decrease in bf?
Also, Brimage weighs at least 10-20 lbs more than the 145 lbs, where he fights.The National BMI is many times not an accurate tool, because it doesn’t take everything in to account.
Example: This fighter is 5’4” 145 lbs
Obviously doesn’t have a high BMI
View attachment 213463
Invalid Link Removed
Yeah I did leave that out.Also, Brimage weighs at least 10-20 lbs more than the 145 lbs, where he fights.
Yeah, the BMI doesn't tell anything on trained individuals. We don't know anything about OP's body comp though. I think you can be fat or shredded at 5'4" and 145 lbs. One would hope someone to be well versed on training and nutrition, when taking the step to add Tren though, but you know..Yeah I did leave that out.
I meant at weigh in.
Only reason I posted that though was to point out the BMI doctors use can be off with someone that’s in shape.
I would expect to have some results at 2 weeks with ace but if you lost 1-2lb of fat and gained 1-2lb of muscle, you might see no difference on the scale and notice no difference how you look. But that would be a significant transformation for 2 weeks, especially the first 2.
Throw out your calculator, and eat less.
I'd have to assume he's lying, or delusional about his actual intake. There is no metabolic magic that stops weight loss because of starvation. Auschwitz prisoners didn't stop losing weight because they cut calories too hard, too fast.That was my first conclusion as well. But given it looks like he's eating well under 1500kcal a day, and has been for nearly 2 months...he probably needs to refeed/diet break and eat at maintanence for a couple of weeks.
And by the sound of it part of his problem is that he never picked up a calculator to begin with.
The National BMI is many times not an accurate tool, because it doesn’t take everything in to account.
Invalid Link Removed
That's true, but metabolism can slow down considerably. I've seen cases, where someone has been eating too little and had their weight loss stall and when more food is added, their weight has started to go down. But yeah anyway this whole thread is weird with the odd diet and Tren and no weight loss in 1-2 months.I'd have to assume he's lying, or delusional about his actual intake. There is no metabolic magic that stops weight loss because of starvation. Auschwitz prisoners didn't stop losing weight because they cut calories too hard, too fast.
I'd have to assume he's lying, or delusional about his actual intake. There is no metabolic magic that stops weight loss because of starvation. Auschwitz prisoners didn't stop losing weight because they cut calories too hard, too fast.
I did the a similar crash diet decades ago. I was hovering just above 1k calories (at 5'10"), mostly protein with a tiny bit of carbs and fat. But I also lost 28lbs in two months, and the mirror showed it. Two months is the absolute longest I'd do something like that since it's obviously not sustainable, and fat free mass will eventually be lost. When you're not lying to yourself about your diet, two months @1200 calories looks something like this... (ps this was way before I touched any peds/aas)Yes, that's true, but your hyperbole overlooks the fact that as bodybuilders we very much do NOT want to get to literal starvation levels of calorie intake because we want to also preserve as much muscle mass as possible. Meaning, we need to be much more strategic and careful with our cuts. So if this guys calorie intake is accurate, he won't be able to reduce it much further.
The idea of a diet break is in part to get leptin levels back up; crash diets like what OP is doing are unsustainable for longer periods simply because they're unhealthy, and we can only go so low before lean mass retention becomes a concern, and skewed metabolic hormones make further fat loss (and not lean tissue loss) extremely difficult.
nahSure but from the sounds of it the OP is not an elite MMA athlete and probably has a more normal fat/muscle distribution.
sure starscreamI guess him being retarded for wanting to lose fat he doesn't have is a better explanation![]()
The point was that the BMI alone doesn't have much value and none, when someone lifts. But like I said, I too think it's possible for a person with that height and weight to have some fat to lose. Although you would hope, that someone taking Tren to have a little different stats, if there's need to lose fat.Sure but from the sounds of it the OP is not an elite MMA athlete and probably has a more normal fat/muscle distribution.
Funny you bring all this information on health and BMI, but yet you’re telling OP advice on using Tren to help cut fat, which is very unhealthy. You really like to argue….that’s obviously more important to you, to win an argument, than to give good healthy advice.Clinically BMI has value (it is used in every medical chart in every hospital) but as a clinician looking at overall health you have to understand there will be outliers. And even with the outliers, extra mass is hard on the health weather it's muscle or fat... it is associated with sleep apnea, heart failure, embolisms etc regardless of bf%. But that's besides the point, what BMI gives us here in this case is a tool so show that for his height he's a little on the heavy side and it's not inconceivable that he may have some fat to lose for cosmetic purposes. Only he knows if that's the case and he seems to be saying it is.
Well, to be precise, you brought the BMI in, saying his BMI brings him to be near overweight. Which really doesn't have much value on estimating wether one has fat to loose or not, on people who have built muscle mass. And it's to be expected, that he has, as he's on BB forum and taking Tren. If BMI chart can be found on hospital walls or on public restroom wall, makes no difference. Like I said, I agree that OP very well can have fat to lose, but BMI is not a valid tool to estimate, wether he has or not. That's all ✌To help you understand, BMI was only brought in as a tool to show he's a little heavy for his height and given a normal fat/muscle distribution it's not nonsense for him to want to recomp.
The whole thing about health and BMI came about because more than one person was saying "BMI alone doesn't have much value and none, when someone lifts" and clinically it does, it absolutely does. So that had to be corrected. But so far as BMI and leanness goes there are outliers, others posted them. This doesn't appear to be an example.
No studies? links? advice on now supplements or hi-tech? boy you are slippinYes I brought the BMI in, because I read "Whoa! 65 kilograms? At 143 lbs do you even have any fat to lose?" and "odd that you would have much fat at only 143 lbs, even at only 5’4” tall."
I agree it would be better if he had posted caliper measurements, bodpod results, or even a picture but we just had his height and weight and all you can do with that is BMI. And according to BMI he's a little on the heavy side for his 5'4" height. You're assuming that since he's even posting here he must be in shape and have a fit, uncommonly muscular body. I am not making that assumption. He appears to be a tren newbie.