Donald Trump running for president

HIT4ME

HIT4ME

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Oh, Im not claiming he has credibility, I just think its awesome to have a old senior in uniform in the middle of the whitehouse lecturing people about new over the top unheard of tinfoil conspiracy theories. Its really entertaining.
Yeah, he must make you feel like your ideas are pretty reasonable!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
Carnivorecon

Carnivorecon

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • Established
  • RockStar
I did just find out they just introduced a bill A. 353 in the New York State that makes it a felony for civilians to own a simple bullet proof vest.

If the bill is passed, New Yorker's must hand over their bullet proof vests within 15 days or they are criminals. A felons. If you purchase one in the future, its first offense is a misdemeanor, additional offense is a class E felony facing 4 years prison.

Good luck in Albany though, I want nothing to do with that crap, LOL
How can protecting yourself be illegal, i don't think they're illegal here in UK and we can't even carry a freakin penknife. Coming soon a bill banning putting your hands up when antifa try to punch you. Where is this all heading?
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
How can protecting yourself be illegal, i don't think they're illegal here in UK and we can't even carry a freakin penknife. Coming soon a bill banning putting your hands up when antifa try to punch you. Where is this all heading?
You can go to prison as a felon in New Jersey for simply having a bb gun without a gun permit.

In New York its a stronger felony if I have possesion of a 11+ magazine clip than acting in real violent crimes against children.

Did you see Groper Joe's and Karamela Fatriss's gun control proposals? Its so extreme they want to make purchasing any gun part online a criminal offense. They even want to hold manufactures fully accountable if someone breaks the law with a gun and have all and every gun sold only as a "smart gun."
 
dixonk

dixonk

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
Oh, Im not claiming he has credibility, I just think its awesome to have a old senior in uniform in the middle of the whitehouse lecturing people about new over the top unheard of tinfoil conspiracy theories. Its really entertaining.
I just find it odd that a flag officer with a full military career doesn’t have any idea the role SF plays. Unless of course inside the capitol building there are foreign guerilla fighters that need to be trained up to fight our enemies, and we need highly trained individuals knowledgeable in the local foreign language to equip and train them to fight....
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
IMG_0408.JPG
 
GreenMachineX

GreenMachineX

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
Warning, put your tinfoil armor before reading this post:

Its psychops and it works. Its a war on your mind.

FYI, I seen the documents, they already had all returning vets on the DHS terrorist watchlist since the early Bareback Hussein Obobo era.
Nothing tin foil hat about that. My wife's first MOS was psyop.
 
BOSSMAN

BOSSMAN

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
No you can't. Honestly go and try, I guarantee you couldn't do it.

They might be open to new people, but they still have to vote you in, so you'd have to demonstrate their values which i doubt any of us here are prepared to do.

Besides, using the Amish as an argument against a minimum wage is literally retarded. Most of us live in the real world where currency buys everything.

Let's not pretend singing kumbuyah is the solution to that issue.
geez, almost every group has a set of rules you have to agree to abide by...i really expect better from you?

and besides i was only replying to your post that anyone can't become amish?
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
I don't know the case at all, but it's important to read the file in context.

One of the first pages states that when they asked people what the evidence was based on, they found it to be hearsay and rumour.

I won't pretend powerful people can cover for other powerful people, but it's important to consider the context as well.

Sounds like he may have just had a good lawyer.

Was he actually guilty? Maybe. I don't know because there's no case evidence in the file and I don't really care. But I've seen this same link posted elsewhere and people are quick to draw from it the wrong conclusions

Screenshot_20210117-085408_Samsung%20Internet.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
Also in the same file dump on the fbi site.
Screenshot_20210117-085945_Samsung%20Internet.jpeg
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
anyone notice that the media aren't playing trumps speech that allegedly started this 'coup' attempt?

if it truly was as incendiary as to be worthy of impeachment one would think they would be playing it non-stop?
I listened to the whole thing live and was watching the Senate or congress hearings live as it all unfolded.

Only fox was playing Dumps speech on television out of all the networks, and on youtube a few alternative media were streaming it. You still should be able to find it on youtube easily.

Its really crazy how it all unfolded in real time.

I never had that feeling that the protestors were going to cause violence based off the speech. Thats my honest opinion.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
I listened to the whole thing live and was watching the Senate or congress hearings live as it all unfolded.

Only fox was playing Dumps speech on television out of all the networks, and on youtube a few alternative media were streaming it. You still should be able to find it on youtube easily.

Its really crazy how it all unfolded in real time.

I never had that feeling that the protestors were going to cause violence based off the speech. Thats my honest opinion.
i totally agree with the last part---i just don't see it!!!
 
THOR 70

THOR 70

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar


This is a very compelling case that the vaccine doesn’t qualify as a vaccine and doesn’t shield DOD from liability under emergency use. It’s not a vaccine but gene therapy. It’s about population control. Mind blowing that the masses will not know any of this as they willingly line up for the jab.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote


This is a very compelling case that the vaccine doesn’t qualify as a vaccine and doesn’t shield DOD from liability under emergency use. It’s not a vaccine but gene therapy. It’s about population control. Mind blowing that the masses will not know any of this as they willingly line up for the jab.
very interesting!!!

@Ricky10
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote


This is a very compelling case that the vaccine doesn’t qualify as a vaccine and doesn’t shield DOD from liability under emergency use. It’s not a vaccine but gene therapy. It’s about population control. Mind blowing that the masses will not know any of this as they willingly line up for the jab.
PiTi88T.jpeg
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
very interesting!!!

@Ricky10
The David Martin guy has been debunked lots of times. He is one of the names behind the "Plandemic."

The fact he said there are no sources that back wearing masks, despite numerous studies backing masks show how biased he is.
 
THOR 70

THOR 70

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
The David Martin guy has been debunked lots of times. He is one of the names behind the "Plandemic."

The fact he said there are no sources that back wearing masks, despite numerous studies backing masks show how biased he is.
If you watch the video he is literally reading laws and excerpts from two of the most prestigious medical journals in the world....
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
If you watch the video he is literally reading laws and excerpts from two of the most prestigious medical journals in the world....
This is his evidence list. It's hardly exhaustive. But I'm going to go through them to see what they actually say
Screenshot_20210117-104324.jpeg
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
If you watch the video he is literally reading laws and excerpts from two of the most prestigious medical journals in the world....
I like that the source he derives this one line from,

"As of this writing, no correlate of protection for SARS-CoV-2 has been established"

has the very next paragraph as this:

"However, neutralizing-antibody levels have been shown to correlate with protection against many viruses in humans14 and have correlated with protection against SARS-CoV-2 in animal challenges.3,15 The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced high levels of both binding and neutralizing antibodies in older adults, and the time- and dose-dependent trends were similar to responses in younger adults2; the responses after the second vaccination were similar to those observed in patients who had recovered from Covid-19 and had donated convalescent serum, including some who were severely ill."
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
FWIW the above is important because in the case of HIV, the presence of antibodies doesn't protect you from the virus. Hence a reason why a vaccine hasn't been developed yet.

In this article: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2770758

They state the following:

The immune correlates of protection are not yet defined for COVID-19, but neutralizing antibodies, especially those that recognize the viral receptor binding domain (RBD) and other epitopes on the spike protein that prevent subsequent angiotensin-converting enzyme II receptor binding, membrane fusion, and viral entry, is one path to immunity.
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
My neighbor took down their American flag and put this up... 🤦🏻‍♀️

IMG_0421.JPG


FYI, they’re 1 of only 2 white families on the block.
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
It is also my understanding that the advertising part (reference 1) is meant to apply to dietary supplements.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
The David Martin guy has been debunked lots of times. He is one of the names behind the "Plandemic."

The fact he said there are no sources that back wearing masks, despite numerous studies backing masks show how biased he is.
the cdc and who have been debunked several times also but you still find them credible-eh?
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
Here is an addition to the above: "In addition, products that claim or imply the ability to mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose or cure COVID-19 must be approved drugs under section 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act" and further "Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the FDA Commissioner may allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
the cdc and who have been debunked several times also but you still find them credible-eh?
Where have they been debunked?
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
This is his evidence list. It's hardly exhaustive. But I'm going to go through them to see what they actually sayView attachment 201301
The last reference, which has this line cited: "No existing vaccines have been shown to be effective against infection with any betacoronavirus, the family that includes SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid-19. SARS, caused by another betacoronavirus" seemingly again misquotes because he somehow forgot to include this:

"Today we have part of the answer, and it is strongly encouraging. The vaccine BNT162b2 is a modified RNA that encodes a version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein containing mutations that lock the protein into a conformation that can induce neutralizing antibody responses. Early clinical trials showed that it could induce both humoral and cellular immunity, although we did not know until now whether these responses would protect against symptomatic infection. "

"The results were impressive."
 
dixonk

dixonk

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
Where have they been debunked?
Masks, origin, precautions, seriousness, and etc. They have literally been wrong about everything from the beginning and have flip flopped, lied, and covered up for China. Yeah I trust The WHO and CDC about as much as a fart when I have diarrhea.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Where have they been debunked?
the cdc in march in march said wearing of masks was not helpful in preventing spread off covid....the who [at least the director] was caught in several falsehoods regarding china and covid, look it up.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Masks, origin, precautions, seriousness, and etc. They have literally been wrong about everything from the beginning and have flip flopped, lied, and covered up for China. Yeah I trust The WHO and CDC about as much as a fart when I have diarrhea.
and yet @Jiigzz will go down with ship defending their every word....talk about drinking the kool aid.


i am sure he will come back with yeah but trump.... :p
 
dixonk

dixonk

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
and yet @Jiigzz will go down with ship defending their every word....talk about drinking the kool aid.


i am sure he will come back with yeah but trump.... :p
No he will be one of the ones calling anyone that doesn’t soak up the bullsh*t lies and Covidiot logic as fact a sheep.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
i am sure @ax1 has a nice list of falsehoods put out by who and cdc?
 
puccah8808

puccah8808

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
the cdc in march in march said wearing of masks was not helpful in preventing spread off covid....the who [at least the director] was caught in several falsehoods regarding china and covid, look it up.
Gotcha. They recanted that though. It is a novel virus remember, so all the answers weren't available at the beginning.

As the science evolves, so too do the recommendations. I'd be more upset if they held firm in the belief despite the evolved evidence
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
i think he has od'd on the liberal kool aid.
Care to comment on any of the above info I posted in regards to that Doctor?
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
No he will be one of the ones calling anyone that doesn’t soak up the bullsh*t lies and Covidiot logic as fact a sheep.
And yet, neither you or Big T have posted anything that actually refutes what I posted.

That was expected though, as soon as I actually read the evidence and post a rebuttal the response is always "you drink the koolaid" or "blah blah liberal blah".

The sheep are the people who endorse alternate views simply because they are alternate. If you never actually read the evidence that people cite to back their stance, then you are being the same sheep you accuse everyone else of being.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
Gotcha. They recanted that though. It is a novel virus remember, so all the answers weren't available at the beginning.

As the science evolves, so too do the recommendations. I'd be more upset if they held firm in the belief despite the evolved evidence
are you kidding....doctors offices and ER's have had masks on hand for over a decade to prevent spread of virus's. the use of masks for virus prevention is well known and has been for a very long time!!!!

geez!!!!
 
dixonk

dixonk

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
And yet, neither you or Big T have posted anything that actually refutes what I posted.

That was expected though, as soon as I actually read the evidence and post a rebuttal the response is always "you drink the koolaid" or "blah blah liberal blah".
Not going to lie...I didn’t even read what you posted lol.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
i am sure @ax1 has a nice list of falsehoods put out by who and cdc?
AX1 will be able to connect them to the NWO and maybe possibly a connection to 9/11.
I have some files on that in the corner, but the US government is across the street pulsating a nano-particle energy beam that side of my house penetrating right through 1" of lead and 7 layers of Reynolds internal shield fused in school glue that I had set up to thwart the attack, but somehow they still breached my barrier...

Ill get right back to you, someone just rung my doorbell.
 
thebigt

thebigt

Legend
Awards
6
  • Best Answer
  • The BigT Award
  • Established
  • Legend!
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
I have some files on that in the corner, but the US government is across the street pulsating a nano-particle energy beam that side of my house penetrating right through 1" of lead and 7 layers of Reynolds internal shield fused in school glue that I had set up to thwart the attack, but somehow they still breached my barrier...

Ill get right back to you, someone just rung my doorbell.
avon calling?
 
Jiigzz

Jiigzz

Legend
Awards
5
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • First Up Vote
are you kidding....doctors offices and ER's have had masks on hand for over a decade to prevent spread of virus's. the use of masks for virus prevention is well known and has been for a very long time!!!!

geez!!!!
In the cases of airbourne ones, yes But if you recall at the beginning they were not yet sure it was transmitted through the air.

You don't wear a mask to protect you against HIV or HPV, and MERS (MERS-COV) was spread mostly through direct contact with hosts.

I can't remember how long it took them to change their recommendation, and maybe it should have been sooner, but other coronaviruses didn't require widespread use of masks to contain (2003 SARS). You're trying to make it sound as if it was common knowledge that masks should have been recommended earlier, but this isn't the first coronavirus we have contended with, but none have been as infectious.

We can still criticize them for being slow to react, which doesn't detract from the fact that this Doctor fellow is blatantly using misleading evidence to argue his view on 'plandemic.'
 
dixonk

dixonk

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
In the cases of airbourne ones, yes But if you recall at the beginning they were not yet sure it was transmitted through the air.

You don't wear a mask to protect you against HIV or HPV, and MERS (MERS-COV) was spread mostly through direct contact with hosts.

I can't remember how long it took them to change their recommendation, and maybe it should have been sooner, but other coronaviruses didn't require widespread use of masks to contain (2003 SARS).
They only changed it to break people’s will and a test of compliance to push their agendas. Masks have not and will not stop, slow, or prevent the spread of the stupid pathetic China virus. Masks have become a cult for some though and they are willing to fight to the death to defend the message of the tyrants.
 

Top