Donald Trump running for president

Jiigzz said:
You should really look at places like 4chan, they call themselves weaponised autism over there.

Those corners of the internet are well famed for tracking people down who don't want to be tracked down. Its why doxxing is such an issue.

Plus there's a photo of him arriving with his mom.
Click to expand...
i bet they didn't turn anyone in for those blm 'peaceful protests' that turned into riots and looting-eh?
 
thebigt said:
i bet they didn't turn anyone in for those blm 'peaceful protests' that turned into riots and looting-eh?
Click to expand...

Yeah wtf is up with that? Seems like its perhaps not about doing the right thing but rather taking out your political enemies.
 
thebigt said:
this was my thought also.
Click to expand...

Throwing fireworks and molotov cocktails at police = mostly peaceful

Naruto popping out of the ceiling and terrorizing corrupt millionaires with garbage ties = extremism

But at least Naruto was wearing a face mask but BLM got grandma dead from Covid.
 
Last edited:
TheNatural21 said:
I wonder if they would blame my death on test e because I mean if it’s my system it had to be the cause. Can’t be a contributing factor to lack of oxygen for 8 minutes. Drugs and steroids don’t have any effect on the heart or blood vessels.
Click to expand...

I didn't take the time to see if anyone responded to this ridiculous comment, but I'll bite.

Are you actually comparing a fentanyl overdose to being on testosterone?

Just want to make sure we are living on the same planet...
 
ax1 said:
I was nervous too, especially if there were people around me because really I didnt trust myself yet and didnt want to put people at risk. I already had two accidents right in the beginning too....first I took a shot forgetting to take my laser bore-sighter out of the front of the barrel, luckily my glasses blocked a plume of smokey backfire. Second I had been looking over my safety glasses to look through my scope and a brass case ricochet off the wall right back over my safety glasses and bounced off the white part of by eye. Ill tell you, Ill never do that again lol I was really lucky, and Im glad there was nobody there to see it (my range/club has no range officer unless there are group events, its like the wild west, lol!)

Going to the range is certainly essential and I dont think you should own a gun if you do not intend to practice, my opinion. Also, why the hell wouldnt you go? I found it to be extremely fun, its like going to the gym and getting your mind off things and when you go back home you just feel good.
Click to expand...

Ouch, good to be careful. I do a lot of renovation work for family and friends and I often realize I am not great with eye protection - I usually put it on right after something bad happens and I almost get shrapnel'd. I haven't done that with guns yet.

One of the big things I really try to practice is the basics of don't put your finger on the trigger until you are ready to shoot, and don't point the gun anywhere you don't intend. Even with that in mind, I've caught myself handling unloaded weapons that I've checked more carelessly than I should and I still have to practice that....just because you want to build that habit while it's not loaded. My philosophy is that if I'm out in public though, it won't even come out of my holster unless someone is about to see it go off. The holster is a great safety mechanism.

ax1 said:
Keep in mind the term "Conspiracy" was weaponized by the deep state during JFK assassination to discredit those who questioned.

You will find the deep state make up their own conspiracies and flood the "conspiracy" world with crazy conspiracies to discredit real conspiracies as well.....usually its the "bigfoot" or "alien invasion" stuff and the viewer at home link real conspiracies with crazy crap together and thats that. The government doesnt need everybody to believe them, just the enough so their ship doesnt sink.

Yes its true, some people just believe anything and say anything, and others maybe perhaps they are just trying to make a dollar or two.
Click to expand...

There is this, but there's also the idea that if you have a little bit of truth about something, flooding that truth with a bunch of obviously incorrect facts will make people remember the 10 falsehoods and forget the 1 truth - even if the 1 truth was damning. All people see is that the overall "idea" was debunked and they associate that with the one fact that was not debunked but they don't realize it.

Like, you know, Clinton raped someone and prevented them from being able to get their day in court; but suddenly that's not true because it's just a witch hunt over him cheating on his wife. Everyone forgets what he really did and focused on the blue dress. And thus, lying under oath and robbing a victim of her day in court goes down as nothing big because it was really about him getting a hummer from Monica in their minds.

ax1 said:
Its both really good and freaking scary as hell. Defending our Bill of Rights and having full force aggressive accountability to those who violate it is crucial to protecting our freedoms, life and liberty, unfortunately we all know its not the case and most people buy/vote into this system. Really sad.

You should look into China's facial recognition tech, they have cameras there EVERYWHERE....some restaurants I sit in have cameras pointed at every single table, and almost every single street corner has a camera if not all in Beijing. They bring up all your info in real time, and every where you go its permanently put on a data base and if they ever bring you in for anything they can instantly pull out your file and tell you they know everywhere you have been. And if the camera doesnt recognize you it brings up fairly accurate date in real time about how old you are, weight, etc......
Click to expand...

Honestly, I'm kind of on both sides. In public, I have no reasonable expectation of privacy so any recording should be fair game and this should go for EVERYONE. As far as being able to search through a database, this is why things like the opening an investigation on someone without evidence, like was done to Trump, becomes very scary - because the people are in a position where this enormous power to gather info on someone without cause. People don't see where that leads and to some degree I don't blame them because I am not sure I really fully understand the implications.

But of course if someone commits a crime and I have them on video, I am all for being able to insert that face into a database and get a name once just cause is established.

ndiguy said:
I didn't take the time to see if anyone responded to this ridiculous comment, but I'll bite.

Are you actually comparing a fentanyl overdose to being on testosterone?

Just want to make sure we are living on the same planet...
Click to expand...

lol, it was a good try at least. A for effort, right?[/QUOTE][/QUOTE][/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 
Jiigzz said:
Haha oh yeah, that's right. Videos of people talking are evidence, how could I have forgotten.
Click to expand...
No idea of the video but just have to point out that yh they can be, been used in court many times. If you don't think so then video yourself discussing robbing a bank and send it your local law enforcement, do let us know how you get on
 
Carnivorecon said:
No idea of the video but just have to point out that yh they can be, been used in court many times. If you don't think so then video yourself discussing robbing a bank and send it your local law enforcement, do let us know how you get on
Click to expand...
i bet cops look people[suspects]up on facebook and social media all the time...
 
Invalid Link Removed
 
thebigt said:
i bet cops look people[suspects]up on facebook and social media all the time...
Click to expand...
Haha thats a safe bet, I've lost count the amount of brainlets I've seen boasting about crime on fb only to get a nice stretch off the back of it. Wouldn't use wastebook myself.
 
He apparently has talked about it two weeks ago, but it wouldn’t allow him to stay a seated president.

Edit* wasn’t parlors servers completely shut down yesterday? Unless that post was old.
 
tyga tyga said:
He apparently has talked about it two weeks ago, but it wouldn’t allow him to stay a seated president.

Edit* wasn’t parlors servers completely shut down yesterday? Unless that post was old.
Click to expand...

Amazon knocked out their webshosting account so now Parler has to find another provider.
 
ax1 said:
Amazon knocked out their webshosting account so now Parler has to find another provider.
Click to expand...

I saw the CEO tweeted out that parlor will likely be down for a long time because no vendor will take them on.
 
Parler sues Amazon for antitrust violations for shutting down their app and asks judge to reinstate them - as CEO insists he was doing more than Facebook and Twitter to remove violence and critics slam the 'purge of free speech'
  • Parler went offline at 3am EST after Amazon booted it from its web hosting app
  • It has already been kicked off Apple and Google's stores after the Capitol siege
  • The right wing social media site announced plans to sue Amazon later Monday filing an 18-page suit in U.S. District Court in Seattle against AWS
  • The app was the most-downloaded on Apple after Donald Trump's Twitter ban
  • CEO John Matze warned that 'we will likely be down longer than expected'
  • He later said the app has 'worked hard' to 'remove prohibited content'
  • Parler could now use its own servers or find another server willing to host it
  • Don Jr. shared a post which read: 'The internet was a hell of a lot safer before @Twitter, @Apple, @Google, and @facebook started protecting us from it'
Invalid Link Removed
 
tyga tyga said:
I saw the CEO tweeted out that parlor will likely be down for a long time because no vendor will take them on.
Click to expand...
could it be they are shutting down avenues of free speech for anyone with opposing views?
 
@ax1 hey, man...have you checked out 'epic times'?

from what i heard it is by former communist chinese, who were/are dissidents.
 
thebigt said:
@ax1 hey, man...have you checked out 'epic times'?

from what i heard it is by former communist chinese, who were dissidents.
Click to expand...

Do you mean "The Epoch Times?" I do actually but not a subscriber so I cant read too much.

I heard an interview from a writer from Epoch Times though a very low key resource of mine way back in January saying that the virus came from the lab in Wuhan and that the PLA scientists had printed material on weaponizing virus's....he was ahead of everybody, way ahead.
 
ax1 said:
Do you mean "The Epoch Times?" I do actually but not a subscriber so I cant read too much.

I heard an interview from a writer from Epoch Times though a very low key resource of mine way back in January saying that the virus came from the lab in Wuhan and that the PLA scientists had printed material on weaponizing virus's....he was ahead of everybody, way ahead.
Click to expand...
yes, epoch times.
 
Twitter is down 5 billion! 🤣
 
thebigt said:
could it be they are shutting down avenues of free speech for anyone with opposing views?
Click to expand...

I suppose. But, that’s what stinks.. private companies are allowed to do this because well, they’re private companies and not publicly owned. So, free speech/1st amendment doesn’t apply since it’s not being silenced by government entities.
 
Invalid Link Removed
 
Invalid Link Removed

Written by Invalid Link Removed
Monday January 11, 2021

Invalid Link Removed

Last week’s massive social media purges – starting with President Trump’s permanent ban from Twitter and other outlets – was shocking and chilling, particularly to those of us who value free expression and the free exchange of ideas. The justifications given for the silencing of wide swaths of public opinion made no sense and the process was anything but transparent. Nowhere in President Trump’s two “offending” Tweets, for example, was a call for violence expressed explicitly or implicitly. It was a classic example of sentence first, verdict later.

Many Americans viewed this assault on social media accounts as a liberal or Democrat attack on conservatives and Republicans, but they are missing the point. The narrowing of allowable opinion in the virtual public square is no conspiracy against conservatives. As progressives like Glenn Greenwald have pointed out, this is a wider assault on any opinion that veers from the acceptable parameters of the mainstream elite, which is made up of both Democrats and Republicans.

Yes, this is partly an attempt to erase the Trump movement from the pages of history, but it is also an attempt to silence any criticism of the emerging political consensus in the coming Biden era that may come from progressive or antiwar circles.

After all, a look at Biden’s incoming “experts” shows that they will be the same failed neoconservative interventionists who gave us weekly kill lists, endless drone attacks and coups overseas, and even US government killing of American citizens abroad. Progressives who complain about this “back to the future” foreign policy are also sure to find their voices silenced.

Those who continue to argue that the social media companies are purely private ventures acting independent of US government interests are ignoring reality. The corporatist merger of “private” US social media companies with US government foreign policy goals has a long history and is deeply steeped in the hyper-interventionism of the Obama/Biden era.

“Big Tech” long ago partnered with the Obama/Biden/Clinton State Department to lend their tools to US “soft power” goals overseas. Whether it was ongoing regime change attempts against Iran, the 2009 coup in Honduras, the disastrous US-led coup in Ukraine, “Arab Spring,” the destruction of Syria and Libya, and so many more, the big US tech firms were happy to partner up with the State Department and US intelligence to provide the tools to empower those the US wanted to seize power and to silence those out of favor.

In short, US government elites have been partnering with “Big Tech” overseas for years to decide who has the right to speak and who must be silenced. What has changed now is that this deployment of “soft power” in the service of Washington’s hard power has come home to roost.

So what is to be done? Even pro-free speech alternative social media outlets are under attack from the Big Tech/government Leviathan. There are no easy solutions. But we must think back to the dissidents in the era of Soviet tyranny. They had no Internet. They had no social media. They had no ability to communicate with thousands and millions of like-minded, freedom lovers. Yet they used incredible creativity in the face of incredible adversity to continue pushing their ideas. Because no army – not even Big Tech partnered with Big Government - can stop an idea whose time has come. And Liberty is that idea. We must move forward with creativity and confidence!

Copyright © 2021 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given. Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Last edited:
tyga tyga said:
I suppose. But, that’s what stinks.. private companies are allowed to do this because well, they’re private companies and not publicly owned. So, free speech/1st amendment doesn’t apply since it’s not being silenced by government entities.
Click to expand...
i read that many government entities in the form of elected officials petitioned for the dropping of several accounts including trumps.

how does section 230 play into this?
 
thebigt said:
i read that many government entities in the form of elected officials petitioned for the dropping of several accounts including trumps.

how does section 230 play into this?
Click to expand...

That is a good question my friend.
 
Trump has never posted on Parler. Its just not one of the places he ever used.

Insurrection Act was not signed, because that would mean he signed it to show it to someone and no one has seen it. To do something with it, and nothing was done. Just stories passed around from someone who knows someone who has a youtube video who knows someone "on the inside".
 
Just a note, since I looked it up myself, lol "Alphabet" is Google.

Invalid Link Removed
 
the editor of forbes has warned corporations not to hire trump officials....that they will deeply regret it.

damn.
 
capital police chief sought DC national guard help before riots but was denied by supervisors... @ax1 did you know this?
 
Clearly not the party of "unity"

If the new Schumer senate eliminates the filibuster (as promised) to pass all the crazy sh1t they have always been dreaming about (as promised)... then the damage will be done and irreversible.

We have two kinds of.news and two sets of facts. Its red states / blue states. Hatfield and McCoy's. Slavery or rebellion. Perhaps maybe acceleration.

I think after Jan 5th in Georgia this little American experiment in divided government is over.
 
puccah8808 said:
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

While this is optimistic for people who want to hold onto what Trump represents to them, it is clearly not true. Trump gave a speech within the last few days and I paraphrase that he said he has exhausted every legal avenue to fight election fraud, we are going to have a new administration,, and his focus is the peaceful and efficient transition of power on the 20th.

Of course you wouldn't know this because no one in the media is playing it, Twitter has blocked him, etc. I found the video on YouTube.

It kind of stinks because both sides have such propaganda and it is out of control.
 
senator josh hawley's book to be cancelled by simon and schuster


damn...opposing views being silenced.
 
HIT4ME said:
While this is optimistic for people who want to hold onto what Trump represents to them, it is clearly not true. Trump gave a speech within the last few days and I paraphrase that he said he has exhausted every legal avenue to fight election fraud, we are going to have a new administration,, and his focus is the peaceful and efficient transition of power on the 20th.

Of course you wouldn't know this because no one in the media is playing it, Twitter has blocked him, etc. I found the video on YouTube.

It kind of stinks because both sides have such propaganda and it is out of control.
Click to expand...
only one side has a platform for it's propaganda it seems-eh?
 
thebigt said:
capital police chief sought DC national guard help before riots but was denied by supervisors... @ax1 did you know this?
Click to expand...

No, but that goes with my theory of a possible stand down order from the inner circles that work inside that building.
 
HIT4ME said:
While this is optimistic for people who want to hold onto what Trump represents to them, it is clearly not true. Trump gave a speech within the last few days and I paraphrase that he said he has exhausted every legal avenue to fight election fraud, we are going to have a new administration,, and his focus is the peaceful and efficient transition of power on the 20th.

Of course you wouldn't know this because no one in the media is playing it, Twitter has blocked him, etc. I found the video on YouTube.

It kind of stinks because both sides have such propaganda and it is out of control.
Click to expand...

I dunnoooo.....

IMG_0305.JPG
 
BamBam54 said:
Clearly not the party of "unity"

If the new Schumer senate eliminates the filibuster (as promised) to pass all the crazy sh1t they have always been dreaming about (as promised)... then the damage will be done and irreversible.

We have two kinds of.news and two sets of facts. Its red states / blue states. Hatfield and McCoy's. Slavery or rebellion. Perhaps maybe acceleration.

I think after Jan 5th in Georgia this little American experiment in divided government is over.
Click to expand...

Here is the thing I recently came to realize. Of course there are not two sets of facts. We always talk about "the middle" and how we should go to the middle. There is NO middle. This is just a way of allowing a pressure relief valve so that people don't have to admit their mistakes and they cam say, "Can we meet in the middle?" And it sounds reasonable and everyone wants to be reasonable so the person who is right gives in and the person who was wrong doesn't have to change.

The problem is that CNN may have SOME things right, and Fox may have SOME things right but they only push a narrative and it is too biased.

We shouldn't be looking for compromise. We should be looking for "reason" and critical thinking.
 
Media: Yes, Violence Is the Answer [Supercut]

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
No, but that goes with my theory of a possible stand down order from the inner circles that work inside that building.
Click to expand...

Yes, one of the commanders stated that he didn't like the optics of a national guard riot line with the Capital building behind them. Which is actually something that needs to be considered...but can't below.

tyga tyga said:
Invalid Link Removed

Click to expand...

Yeah, so suddenly the FBI is all over the riots. There were hundreds of thousands of people who knew about the Capitol protests and it was all broadcast on Parker, yet somehow they were caught with their pants down in spite of all the surveillance we have been discussing in this thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top