Donald Trump running for president

Jiigzz said:
Except the scientists are all over the world. Do you truly think they all agree masks are useful to enforce the US agenda?

Moreover, back in 1918 they mandated masks for the Spaniah Flu in the US. Was that all a ploy for the 2020 Covid?

Science denial is going to be the downfall of mankind, and you are riding first class into idiotville
Click to expand...

Skepticism not denial. When you are constantly lied to don’t be surprised when people are skeptical of what you are saying. Show the evidence, give an example. Just because you say it works doesn’t mean I should believe it.
 
dixonk said:
We are so racist that we elected a black president...twice 🤦🏼‍♂️
Click to expand...
Much to the hate of some bigoted Republicans. Racism never went away, it got subdued and later rebelled and voted in an orange puppet who revels in division and hate
 
Jiigzz said:
Much to the hate of some bigoted Republicans. Racism never went away, it got subdued and later rebelled and voted in an orange puppet who revels in division and hate
Click to expand...
you sound very hateful? :unsure:
 
Jiigzz said:
Much to the hate of some bigoted Republicans. Racism never went away, it got subdued and later rebelled and voted in an orange puppet who revels in division and hate
Click to expand...
everytime time a republican disagreed with a obama policy decision they were called racist...this is why trump was elected.
 
thebigt said:
you sound very hateful? :unsure:
Click to expand...
I kept posting evidence and research and all I was getting back is emotionally charged arguments and memes. Somehow those were taken to be equitable forms of evidence, so I've stopped trying.

I truly believe that anti-intellectualism is rampant in societies right now. We have people proclaiming the earth is flat in the midst of overwhelming evidence. We have people claiming vaccines cause autism in the face of credible evidence it doesnt. We have people claiming 5g is responsible for covid-19, in the face of logic and evidence.

Science is facing an uphill battle against anti-intellectualism, because people see it as being skeptical. Skepticism is a healthy doubt when faced with no real credible evidence. Lots of the arguments being present are not skepticism, but denial.
 
Jiigzz said:
I kept posting evidence and research and all I was getting back is emotionally charged arguments and memes. Somehow those were taken to be equitable forms of evidence, so I've stopped trying.

I truly believe that anti-intellectualism is rampant in societies right now. We have people proclaiming the earth is flat in the midst of overwhelming evidence. We have people claiming vaccines cause autism in the face of credible evidence it doesnt. We have people claiming 5g is responsible for covid-19, in the face of logic and evidence.

Science is facing an uphill battle against anti-intellectualism, because people see it as being skeptical. Skepticism is a healthy doubt when faced with no real credible evidence. Lots of the arguments being present are not skepticism, but denial.
Click to expand...
science and intellectualism needs to stay out of politics if it wants to be taken serious by everyone, it seems it's goal is to preach to the choir rather than reach out to win over the doubters. seriously, they need to stop behaving like elitists.
 
thebigt said:
science and intellectualism needs to stay out of politics if it wants to be taken serious by everyone, it seems it's goal is to preach to the choir rather than reach out to win over the doubters. seriously, they need to stop behaving like elitists.
Click to expand...
Intelligence and science should be kept out of politics?

If that's the case, so should any kind of faith.
 
thebigt said:
science and intellectualism needs to stay out of politics if it wants to be taken serious by everyone, it seems it's goal is to preach to the choir rather than reach out to win over the doubters. seriously, they need to stop behaving like elitists.
Click to expand...

Do as I say and follow all my orders without question or I will call you a racist flat earther lol.
 
dixonk said:
Lol. Sure.
Click to expand...

You can’t truly sit here with a straight face and say he isn’t educated on American politics. You may disagree with all of his points, but he’s able to make coherent arguments and present evidence. Could you have the same discussion except about New Zealand politics? And again, while you may disagree with him, how many Americans present actual evidence or make a coherent argument when talking politics?

How many Americans, including Fox News, didn’t understand that AOC seconded the nomination of Sanders because he met the threshold of delegates to be nominated.

You can acknowledge that someone has knowledge in an area and still disagree with them.
 
Jiigzz said:
Even slavers had sex with their slaves.
Click to expand...
which slavers?
african
egyptian
greek
roman
american indian
aztec
mayan
portugal
the british call themselves colonizers and think they are above the term slaver.
 
Tucker analyzes Kamala Harris' dramatic shift on criminal justice

Invalid Link Removed
 
Woody said:
You can’t truly sit here with a straight face and say he isn’t educated on American politics. You may disagree with all of his points, but he’s able to make coherent arguments and present evidence. Could you have the same discussion except about New Zealand politics? And again, while you may disagree with him, how many Americans present actual evidence or make a coherent argument when talking politics?

How many Americans, including Fox News, didn’t understand that AOC seconded the nomination of Sanders because he met the threshold of delegates to be nominated.

You can acknowledge that someone has knowledge in an area and still disagree with them.
Click to expand...
and he really is a decent guy...truly!!! (y)
 
thebigt said:
and he really is a decent guy...truly!!! (y)
Click to expand...
Jiigzz said:
I kept posting evidence and research and all I was getting back is emotionally charged arguments and memes. Somehow those were taken to be equitable forms of evidence, so I've stopped trying.

I truly believe that anti-intellectualism is rampant in societies right now. We have people proclaiming the earth is flat in the midst of overwhelming evidence. We have people claiming vaccines cause autism in the face of credible evidence it doesnt. We have people claiming 5g is responsible for covid-19, in the face of logic and evidence.

Science is facing an uphill battle against anti-intellectualism, because people see it as being skeptical. Skepticism is a healthy doubt when faced with no real credible evidence. Lots of the arguments being present are not skepticism, but denial.
Click to expand...

Its sorta flat and sorta round. More like flat rounded and things still work alright upside down. Im more of a in the middle kinda guy.

I have proof with this image below.

Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
Its sorta flat and sorta round. More like flat rounded and things still work alright upside down. Im more of a in the middle kinda guy.

I have proof with this image below.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

With words like omega and two equal signs, who can disagree with that? Quite compelling imo.
 
thebigt said:
are you a politician?
are you a man of faith?
Click to expand...
I would just expect that anyone dictating policies should use intelligence and science as a basis for their rationale - I'd definitely prefer that over someone using emotional arguments or faith.

I don't expect them to be experts, but just exercise reasonable logic.
 
Last edited:
Jiigzz said:
I would just expect that anyone dictating policies should use intelligence and science as a basis for their rationale.

I don't expect them to be experts, but just exercise reasonable logic.
Click to expand...

Lol. You get a sense of intelligence out of people dictating policy?
 
thebigt said:
'pelosi backs joe kennedy in senate primary against liberal incumbant, draws AOC scorn'.....


time for popcorn!!!
Click to expand...
AOC is a fierce young woman...Pelosi should be scared
 
dixonk said:
I only hope that before that wicked witch leaves DC I get to see her dentures fly out of her mouth on live TV. Just once, please.
Click to expand...

She has all that plastic on her face to keep those ivory in.
 
dixonk said:
Lol. You get a sense of intelligence out of people dictating policy?
Click to expand...
It's clearly not evident, but intellect is absolutely an important factor for me. Even i dont agree with the outcome, if they use evidence then I'm ok with that.

I much prefer rationale argument over "Biden has dementia" or "Biden hates God" or "Biden hates America". That's just appealing to emotion and pandering to your voter base.
 
Jiigzz said:
It's clearly not evident, but intellect is absolutely an important factor for me. Even i dont agree with the outcome, if they use evidence then I'm ok with that.

I much prefer rationale argument over "Biden has dementia" or "Biden hates God" or "Biden hates America". That's just appealing to emotion and pandering to your voter base.
Click to expand...

When Biden speaks does he strike you as someone with intellect? Would you trust your children with him?
 
Jiigzz said:
It's clearly not evident, but intellect is absolutely an important factor for me. Even i dont agree with the outcome, if they use evidence then I'm ok with that.

I much prefer rationale argument over "Biden has dementia" or "Biden hates God" or "Biden hates America". That's just appealing to emotion and pandering to your voter base.
Click to expand...

When Biden speaks does he strike you as someone with intellect? Would you trust your children with him?
 
I think the biggest question is why has Biden been in public office for 47 years and have accomplished nothing meaningful, and now all of the sudden he has the solution to all our problems? I am not a fan of career lifelong politicians regardless of party.
 
I think the biggest question is why has Biden been in public office for 47 years and have accomplished nothing meaningful, and now all of the sudden he has the solution to all our problems? I am not a fan of career lifelong politicians regardless of party.
 
dixonk said:
When Biden speaks does he strike you as someone with intellect? Would you trust your children with him?
Click to expand...
I dont think either of them are suitable tbh. I'd struggle to cast my vote.

Heck, in one poll I saw about why people would vote Biden, oneeading option had the most points in "because hes not trump".
 
Jiigzz said:
I dont think either of them are suitable tbh. I'd struggle to cast my vote.

Heck, in one poll I saw about why people would vote Biden, oneeading option had the most points in "because hes not trump".
Click to expand...

That’s literally all they are running on at this point.
 
dixonk said:
I think the biggest question is why has Biden been in public office for 47 years and have accomplished nothing meaningful, and now all of the sudden he has the solution to all our problems? I am not a fan of career lifelong politicians regardless of party.
Click to expand...

His brain is gonna give out before he is inaugurated, Karmel Fatriss will be handed the toarch then AOC will be appointed her VP.
 
Jiigzz said:
I dont think either of them are suitable tbh. I'd struggle to cast my vote.

Heck, in one poll I saw about why people would vote Biden, oneeading option had the most points in "because hes not trump".
Click to expand...

Voting is extremely easy this year, Jo Jorgensen 2020!

Not to pick on you, but you seem to be stuck that there are only 2 choices on the ballot.
 
ax1 said:
Voting is extremely easy this year, Jo Jorgensen 2020!

Not to pick on you, but you seem to be stuck that there are only 2 choices on the ballot.
Click to expand...

Didn’t she come out in support of BLM? Her policies look awesome. No way in hell congress would ever go for any of it unfortunately.
 
dixonk said:
Didn’t she come out in support of BLM? Her policies look awesome. No way in hell congress would ever go for any of it unfortunately.
Click to expand...

She supports BLM yes, but she is like me. We both disagree with their solutions thats why I relate to Jo.

We can support BLM by reaching out to them and helping them understand how the best solution to their problems is liberty, freedom and the US Constitution. We have to try to get them to understand its not the US Constitution that failed them, but all the oath violators in office.

Congress needs to be cleaned out to, I am not voting for a single Demican or Republicrat unless there is a standout who is liberty minded. The most realistic scenario is that the Libertarian can take a few national seats within 10 years and keep growing in more localized elections. Its a long process but as of now I am part of it.
 
ax1 said:
Voting is extremely easy this year, Jo Jorgensen 2020!

Not to pick on you, but you seem to be stuck that there are only 2 choices on the ballot.
Click to expand...
Haha, while she has some good policies, I typically disagree with some of the core libertarian principles personally.

Although, if she is a true leader, then I'd be more inclined to listen. So itll be a tradeoff. I'm more progressive than libertarian
 
dixonk said:
I think the biggest question is why has Biden been in public office for 47 years and have accomplished nothing meaningful, and now all of the sudden he has the solution to all our problems? I am not a fan of career lifelong politicians regardless of party.
Click to expand...
1009990000% agreed
 
Jiigzz said:
Haha, while she has some good policies, I typically disagree with some of the core libertarian principles personally.

Although, if she is a true leader, then I'd be more inclined to listen. So itll be a tradeoff. I'm more progressive than libertarian
Click to expand...

The L party is an interesting bunch, you can be as liberal or conservative as you want to be as long as you dont force your ways on others.

Some Ls are the flip the button type and change things overnight, others such as Jo are more modest and pragmatic.

Im more for the pragmatic type even though I express some hardliner principles here, Im into phasing things out and outlining replacements before some changes occur. The mistake is when you make changes people get scared, and they have every right be until they understand the whole situation from the different perspective and things are planned out intelligently.
 
Last edited:
ax1 said:
The L party is an interesting bunch, you can be as liberal or conservative as you want to be as long as you dont force your ways on others.

Some Ls are the flip the button type and change things overnight, others such as Jo are more modest and pragmatic.

Im more for the pragmatic type even though I express some hardliner principles here, Im into phasing things out and outlining replacements before some changes occur. The mistake is when you make changes people get scared, and they have every right be until they understand the whole situation from the different perspective and things are planned out intelligently.
Click to expand...
Yeah I agree. Phasing is far more palatable than outright changing things
 
2000 - Donald Trump on including 3rd party candidates in the Presidential Debates.

Dump calling the lack on 3rd party voices in the debates as 'disgraceful'

Looks like Dump wants no part of Jo Jorgensen, hypocritical filth Dump is!!!!

Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
2000 - Donald Trump on including 3rd party candidates in the Presidential Debates.

Dump calling the lack on 3rd party voices in the debates as 'disgraceful'

Looks like Dump wants no part of Jo Jorgensen, hypocritical filth Dump is!!!!

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
No
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top