Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

ax1 said:
Id wonder why the media is ramming it down in the publics throat in the first place. Id bet most if not all of those families ever even heard of Alex Jones until the mainstream media kept attacking their competition.

Other than that, they could have left it alone and probably nobody would have put thought into it.

He wasnt ranting about imaginary crap for hundreds of hours, but if you want to mold my experience of actually listening to the show good luck.
Click to expand...

So it's the other media's fault? It always seems to be somebody else's fault. Some of those families know who Alex Jones is because of sick fucks like Wolfgang Halbig who--with the help of Alex Jones--harassed those families, accusing them of participating in a fake school shooting.
 
ax1 said:
Just dont listen to his show if he bothers you that much, I dont know what else to tell ya. Your acting like he is my man or something I dont get it. I used to listen him to alot because it was very entertaining and I love alot of the topics he was talking about and had some interesting people on often...its just a stupid show, and by stupid I dont even mean in a bad way.

I dont really care much for the mainstream media, they really have no credibility with me. If there is anything I can conclude to its that. I just watch it because I study the propaganda and I also find it entertaining.
Click to expand...
You were pretty much just defending him though, saying he was being taken out of context, and that Google and Duck Duck Go are biased against him. The guy who said the government was putting chemicals in the water to make the frogs gay. Nothing the media could make up about him can top what he actually says.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
So it's the other media's fault? It always seems to be somebody else's fault. Some of those families know who Alex Jones is because of sick fucks like Wolfgang Halbig who--with the help of Alex Jones--harassed those families, accusing them of participating in a fake school shooting.
Click to expand...

Ok, I dont think we are going to agree on this one. I think its time to move on.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
You were pretty much just defending him though, saying he was being taken out of context, and that Google and Duck Duck Go are biased against him. The guy who said the government was putting chemicals in the water to make the frogs gay. Nothing the media could make up about him can top what he actually says.
Click to expand...

Because I call everything as I see it. I even defend Dump on things and I want him in prison for humanitarian crimes. Alex isnt that bad, lol damn I cant believe what MSNBC did to you RRROOFFFLLLLLLLL
 
ax1 said:
Ok, I dont think we are going to agree on this one. I think its time to move on.
Click to expand...

You talk about drone attacks and post pictures of dead and dying kids in other countries for years. I call you out on being a hypocrite for supporting pieces of **** that piss on the memories of dead American kids under the guise of "anomalies" and it's time to move on lmao. Feel free to point out where I'm lying at any point.
 
ax1 said:
Because I call everything as I see it. I even defend Dump on things and I want him in prison for humanitarian crimes. Alex isnt that bad, lol damn I cant believe what MSNBC did to you RRROOFFFLLLLLLLL
Click to expand...
What MSNBC did to me? I honestly can't tell you the last time I watched MSNBC, but nice try...

I never said Alex is a war criminal, only that he says asinine things.

You're making some Olympian-level leaps in logic today man...
 
Aleksandar37 said:
You talk about drone attacks and post pictures of dead and dying kids in other countries for years. I call you out on being a hypocrite for supporting pieces of **** that piss on the memories of dead American kids under the guise of "anomalies" and it's time to move on lmao. Feel free to point out where I'm lying at any point.
Click to expand...

Because I see it completely differently than you and this isnt going anywhere at all. I respect your opinion, it is noted and heard here, and everyone is on your side on this one. Ill step out a loser, wave a white flag and live with it.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
What MSNBC did to me? I honestly can't tell you the last time I watched MSNBC, but nice try...

I never said Alex is a war criminal, only that he says asinine things.

You're making some Olympian-level leaps in logic today man...
Click to expand...

I did, I used to watch Rachael Maddow talk about the Sandy Hook incident, it just seemed you were mirroring her. Srs. My bad.
 
Last edited:
muscleupcrohn said:
The guy who said the government was putting chemicals in the water to make the frogs gay.
Click to expand...

Something like this isnt a far stretch, John P. Holdren, Obobo's former science czar actual wrote a book about population control and suggested putting chemicals in the public water supply to sterilize society. The government really is loaded with a bunch of sick freaks. He even promoted infanticide.

I actually have his book on PDF somewhere, its called Ecoscience if I remember.
 
ax1 said:
Something like this isnt a far stretch, John P. Holdren, Obobo's former science czar actual wrote a book about population control and suggested putting chemicals in the public water supply to sterilize society. The government really is loaded with a bunch of sick freaks. He even promoted infanticide.

I actually have his book on PDF somewhere, its called Ecoscience if I remember.
Click to expand...
While I don't think either are happening, trying to sterilize parts of the population makes more "sense" from a population control perspective, and is infinitely more possible, than trying to turn people gay via the drinking water...

It's 100% a stretch. A HUGE STRETCH.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
While I don't think either are happening, trying to sterilize parts of the population makes more "sense" from a population control perspective, and is infinitely more possible, than trying to turn people gay via the drinking water...

It's 100% a stretch. A HUGE STRETCH.
Click to expand...

Where did you hear that gay frog thing anyways? Thats freaking hilarious!
 
ax1 said:
Where did you hear that gay frog thing anyways? Thats freaking hilarious!
Click to expand...
It's been an internet meme for years lol. I'm pretty sure Jones ranted about it, but I honestly never know if he's serious or not, since some things are so crazy I can only hope they're comedy.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
It's been an internet meme for years lol. I'm pretty sure Jones ranted about it, but I honestly never know if he's serious or not, since some things are so crazy I can only hope they're comedy.
Click to expand...

I cant tell you for sure he goes into comedy mode and talks crazy stuff just to be funny as a reaction to people always yelling "conspiracy theorist" at every issue. And I have seen bits of that then used back against him to discredit his show.
 
nostrum420 said:
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

I looked that up there, it was a legitimate topic. Him saying "turning frogs gay" was Alex just doing a classic funny rant.

The documents released to the Sunshine Project under a freedom of information request titled "Harassing, Annoying and Bad Guy Identifying Chemicals" includes several proposals for the military use of chemicals that could be sprayed on to enemy positions. "One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour," says the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

The Pentagon did not deny that the proposal had been made: "The department of defence is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform."

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Invalid Link Removed
ax1 said:
I looked that up there, it was a legitimate topic. Him saying "turning frogs gay" was Alex just doing a classic funny rant.

The documents released to the Sunshine Project under a freedom of information request titled "Harassing, Annoying and Bad Guy Identifying Chemicals" includes several proposals for the military use of chemicals that could be sprayed on to enemy positions. "One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour," says the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

The Pentagon did not deny that the proposal had been made: "The department of defence is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform."

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

It's hard to assume he's joking when he concludes by exclaiming "it's not funny!"
 
nostrum420 said:
Invalid Link Removed


It's hard to assume he's joking when he concludes by exclaiming "it's not funny!"
Click to expand...

My all time favorite piece was when I saw him on the Piers Morgan show a number of years ago, definitely one of my own personal favorite tv moments in history, couldnt stop laughing. CiaNN cut out a piece where I was about to go into Piers Morgan's crimes in the UK, you can figure out where that is. Anyways point is you can get a bigger glimpse on his sense of humor style in the debate. The British part was the best.

2 parts:

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Last edited:
The early results are in on Sweden's herd immunity experiment.

Sweden is still nowhere near 'herd immunity,' even though it didn't go into lockdown

(CNN)Invalid Link Removed that despite adopting more relaxed measures to control coronavirus, only 7.3% of people in Invalid Link Removed had developed the antibodies needed to fight the disease by late April.

The figure, which Sweden's Public Health Authority confirmed to CNN, is roughly similar to other countries that have data and well below the 70-90% needed to create "herd immunity" in a population.

It comes after the country adopted a very different strategy to stop the spread of coronavirus to other countries by only imposing very light restrictions on daily life.

Sweden's chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell said the number was a "little lower" than expected "but not remarkably lower, maybe one or a couple of percent."

"It squares pretty well with the models we have," he added, while speaking at a news conference in Stockholm.

The study carried out by Sweden's Public Health Agency aims to determine the potential herd immunity in the population, based on 1,118 tests carried out in one week. It aims to carry out the same number of tests every seven days over an eight-week period. Results from other regions would be released later, a Public Health Authority spokesperson said.

Full story: Invalid Link Removed
 
muscleupcrohn said:
While I don't think either are happening, trying to sterilize parts of the population makes more "sense" from a population control perspective, and is infinitely more possible, than trying to turn people gay via the drinking water...

It's 100% a stretch. A HUGE STRETCH.
Click to expand...

This doesnt prove it works, but they at least had on record the Military Industrial Complex had been putting resources in trying.

Gay bomb and BMJ authors win prizes

A novel weapon under investigation by the US Air Force has won this year's Ig Nobel peace prize. The Ig Nobel awards, given for science that “first makes you laugh, then makes you think,” were given to recipients from five continents by six winners of the actual Nobel prize last week at Harvard University.

The unusual weapon, confirmed by Pentagon sources, is a “gay bomb” (Invalid Link Removed, 12 Jun, “Sunshine project uncovers US military ‘gay bomb'”). The project, which officials say has now been scrapped, was to come up with a device to release unspecified hormones that could be absorbed through the skin or lungs, thereby incapacitating soldiers who—according to the plan—would be too busy swooning over each other in homosexual ecstasy to waste any time dashing about planting roadside bombs.

The Pentagon did not respond to inquiries from the BMJ about possible future plans for its “make love not war” initiative.

Invalid Link Removed
 
If, like the GOP claims, that Democrats...

1) Control the weather
2) Control earthquakes
3) Control global economies
4) Control global pandemics

...you’d be crazy to vote against a party with all that power.
 
ax1 said:
This doesnt prove it works, but they at least had on record the Military Industrial Complex had been putting resources in trying.

Gay bomb and BMJ authors win prizes
Click to expand...

It did work.. albeit by accident on the set of "TOP GUN".. it was pure accident.. or was it?

Invalid Link Removed
 
biden says 'undecided' black voters aint black....lol, ok joe!!!
 
muscleupcrohn said:
Leave it to an old white man to tell black people they aren’t black. And to use slang while doing it, just to make it worse than it would have already been. It’s like he’s actively trying to lose.
Click to expand...
I seriously think he doesn't now what he is doing...this is the same guy who said he is running for senate--it would be funny if it weren't so sad.
 
thebigt said:
I seriously think he doesn't now what he is doing...this is the same guy who said he is running for senate--it would be funny if it weren't so sad.
Click to expand...

Im not sure he is going to actually make it that far, although I kinda wanna watched a Dump of Biden debate for its entertainment value.

King Cumho will probably take the throne or if he was genuine about not getting involved its Hitlery. Burn-knee who???
 
muscleupcrohn said:
I mean, his entire platform is “I’m not Trump.” That same basic “platform” didn’t really work very well in 2016.

But yeah, a Biden vs Trump debate would be insanity.
Click to expand...
that debate will never happen...biden will do so poorly in preparation that I can't see his handlers allowing it to happen….
 
justhere4comm said:
Dump is down in the polls and he's doing all the talking... lmao.
Click to expand...

Wasn’t he down even the day of the election when he won?

What I am looking at is swing states that have a large unemployment rate and are having fiscal issues. When they hit the voting machine will they vote for the guy that wants to keep the country open regardless of a 2nd wave? Or will they vote to stay broke?
 
muscleupcrohn said:
Sort of how he was down in 2016? I’m just saying, don’t take it as a given that he’ll lose. There’s plenty of time for Biden to blow it.
Click to expand...
SPEAKING OF BLOW IT...bidens name will be changed to linda lovelace
 
My dad has litterally voted red his entire 75 years and will be voting blue in November. Just an anecdote but anyone who thinks this is the same as 2016... I don't see it. I'm not saying Trump won't win but Joe Biden =/= Hillary and a lot of people don't have the same view of Trump they did in '16.
 
nostrum420 said:
My dad has litterally voted red his entire 75 years and will be voting blue in November. Just an anecdote but anyone who thinks this is the same as 2016... I don't see it. I'm not saying Trump won't win but Joe Biden =/= Hillary and a lot of people don't have the same view of Trump they did in '16.
Click to expand...

From an outsiders perspective I think Hitlery has far more charisma and appears to be far more intellegent the Bitten, but at the same time its easier to hate Hitlery than Bitten for some reason.
 
Dump F*ck will not win a second term.
I'll put money on that. I'd vote for anyone but that *git.

*Git (slang) ... Git is a term of insult with origins in English denoting an unpleasant, silly, incompetent, annoying, senile, elderly or childish person. As a mild oath it is roughly on a par with prat and marginally less pejorative than berk.
 
ax1 said:
From an outsiders perspective I think Hitlery has far more charisma and appears to be far more intellegent the Bitten, but at the same time its easier to hate Hitlery than Bitten for some reason.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Biden is considerably more congenial than Hillary or Trump and that may end up being a lot of what this election is about, as stupid and shallow as that is.
 
justhere4comm said:
Dump F*ck will not win a second term.
I'll put money on that. I'd vote for anyone but that *git.

*Git (slang) ... Git is a term of insult with origins in English denoting an unpleasant, silly, incompetent, annoying, senile, elderly or childish person. As a mild oath it is roughly on a par with prat and marginally less pejorative than berk.
Click to expand...

I dunno, Biden is giving that same middle finger to the industrial mid-west as neoliberals love to do...
 
nostrum420 said:
I dunno, Biden is giving that same middle finger to the industrial mid-west as neoliberals love to do...
Click to expand...

Under normal circumstances, this might be a larger factor, but you have quite a few farmers who have gotten screwed over by Trump and his tariff fail. You also have a lot of industrial workers who have been stuck at home, unable to work, listening to their spouses accuse them of getting what they voted for or even thinking themselves if they want to chance doing this again next year and the year after that. Human nature hasn't changed, but there are a lot of factors currently that weren't present in the last election. I don't see a lot of people who voted for Hillary now changing their vote to Trump, but I think it's more feasible the other way around to Biden or whoever is standing up there.
 
nostrum420 said:
My dad has litterally voted red his entire 75 years and will be voting blue in November. Just an anecdote but anyone who thinks this is the same as 2016... I don't see it. I'm not saying Trump won't win but Joe Biden =/= Hillary and a lot of people don't have the same view of Trump they did in '16.
Click to expand...
All I mean in comparing it to 2016 is that there’s no such thing as a sure thing here IMO.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
All I mean in comparing it to 2016 is that there’s no such thing as a sure thing here IMO.
Click to expand...
Aleksandar37 said:
Under normal circumstances, this might be a larger factor, but you have quite a few farmers who have gotten screwed over by Trump and his tariff fail. You also have a lot of industrial workers who have been stuck at home, unable to work, listening to their spouses accuse them of getting what they voted for or even thinking themselves if they want to chance doing this again next year and the year after that. Human nature hasn't changed, but there are a lot of factors currently that weren't present in the last election. I don't see a lot of people who voted for Hillary now changing their vote to Trump, but I think it's more feasible the other way around to Biden or whoever is standing up there.
Click to expand...

Yeah, like I said, I really think there are good arguments to be made both for and against Trump's reelection odds; coin flip.
 
She's 'special'...

Invalid Link Removed


194197
 
I'm not a big fan of Biden, but you know what they say? Once Bitten you go Biden... err... uh...
Anyone but the guy who bankrupted a casino.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top