So it's the other media's fault? It always seems to be somebody else's fault. Some of those families know who Alex Jones is because of sick fucks like Wolfgang Halbig who--with the help of Alex Jones--harassed those families, accusing them of participating in a fake school shooting.
You were pretty much just defending him though, saying he was being taken out of context, and that Google and Duck Duck Go are biased against him. The guy who said the government was putting chemicals in the water to make the frogs gay. Nothing the media could make up about him can top what he actually says.
Ok, I dont think we are going to agree on this one. I think its time to move on.
Because I call everything as I see it. I even defend Dump on things and I want him in prison for humanitarian crimes. Alex isnt that bad, lol damn I cant believe what MSNBC did to you RRROOFFFLLLLLLLL
You talk about drone attacks and post pictures of dead and dying kids in other countries for years. I call you out on being a hypocrite for supporting pieces of **** that piss on the memories of dead American kids under the guise of "anomalies" and it's time to move on lmao. Feel free to point out where I'm lying at any point.
Because I see it completely differently than you and this isnt going anywhere at all. I respect your opinion, it is noted and heard here, and everyone is on your side on this one. Ill step out a loser, wave a white flag and live with it.
My wording is making a suggestion, not a command.
I did, I used to watch Rachael Maddow talk about the Sandy Hook incident, it just seemed you were mirroring her. Srs. My bad.
Something like this isnt a far stretch, John P. Holdren, Obobo's former science czar actual wrote a book about population control and suggested putting chemicals in the public water supply to sterilize society. The government really is loaded with a bunch of sick freaks. He even promoted infanticide.
Where did you hear that gay frog thing anyways? Thats freaking hilarious!
I cant tell you for sure he goes into comedy mode and talks crazy stuff just to be funny as a reaction to people always yelling "conspiracy theorist" at every issue. And I have seen bits of that then used back against him to discredit his show.
I looked that up there, it was a legitimate topic. Him saying "turning frogs gay" was Alex just doing a classic funny rant.
www.theguardian.com
It's hard to assume he's joking when he concludes by exclaiming "it's not funny!"I looked that up there, it was a legitimate topic. Him saying "turning frogs gay" was Alex just doing a classic funny rant.
The documents released to the Sunshine Project under a freedom of information request titled "Harassing, Annoying and Bad Guy Identifying Chemicals" includes several proposals for the military use of chemicals that could be sprayed on to enemy positions. "One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour," says the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.
The Pentagon did not deny that the proposal had been made: "The department of defence is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform."
BBC NEWS | Americas | US military pondered love not war
news.bbc.co.ukAir force looked at spray to turn enemy gay
Make love not war may be the enduring slogan of anti-war campaigners but in 1994 the US air force produced its own variation on the philosophy.
My all time favorite piece was when I saw him on the Piers Morgan show a number of years ago, definitely one of my own personal favorite tv moments in history, couldnt stop laughing. CiaNN cut out a piece where I was about to go into Piers Morgan's crimes in the UK, you can figure out where that is. Anyways point is you can get a bigger glimpse on his sense of humor style in the debate. The British part was the best.
www.cnn.com
This doesnt prove it works, but they at least had on record the Military Industrial Complex had been putting resources in trying.
Leave it to an old white man to tell black people they aren’t black. And to use slang while doing it, just to make it worse than it would have already been. It’s like he’s actively trying to lose.
I seriously think he doesn't now what he is doing...this is the same guy who said he is running for senate--it would be funny if it weren't so sad.
Im not sure he is going to actually make it that far, although I kinda wanna watched a Dump of Biden debate for its entertainment value.
it's good you added a LOL behind that statement, lol.
I mean, his entire platform is “I’m not Trump.” That same basic “platform” didn’t really work very well in 2016.
that debate will never happen...biden will do so poorly in preparation that I can't see his handlers allowing it to happen….
Wasn’t he down even the day of the election when he won?
Sort of how he was down in 2016? I’m just saying, don’t take it as a given that he’ll lose. There’s plenty of time for Biden to blow it.
SPEAKING OF BLOW IT...bidens name will be changed to linda lovelace
Yeah but that was before 4 years of TDS. I've got this thing at a perfect 50/50 coin flip.
From an outsiders perspective I think Hitlery has far more charisma and appears to be far more intellegent the Bitten, but at the same time its easier to hate Hitlery than Bitten for some reason.
I dunno, Biden is giving that same middle finger to the industrial mid-west as neoliberals love to do...
True, but hardly the first time a US President has been elected due to that
Under normal circumstances, this might be a larger factor, but you have quite a few farmers who have gotten screwed over by Trump and his tariff fail. You also have a lot of industrial workers who have been stuck at home, unable to work, listening to their spouses accuse them of getting what they voted for or even thinking themselves if they want to chance doing this again next year and the year after that. Human nature hasn't changed, but there are a lot of factors currently that weren't present in the last election. I don't see a lot of people who voted for Hillary now changing their vote to Trump, but I think it's more feasible the other way around to Biden or whoever is standing up there.
All I mean in comparing it to 2016 is that there’s no such thing as a sure thing here IMO.
Yeah, like I said, I really think there are good arguments to be made both for and against Trump's reelection odds; coin flip.
