Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

ax1 said:
Yeah thats one of the issues that flip opposite sides of the same coin for sure...Definitely sad when one of the very prime job requirements for the Supreme Court is weather or not you like killing little babies or not rather than taking oath to protect the actual Constitution.
Click to expand...

sometimes in life you gotta work with what you got.
 
looks like the soros paid for harassment is stepping up...got to give soros credit, the man knows how to organize a good protest....I guess if you throw enough money around you can get certain people to do most anything-I wonder what promises have been made to flake, his future seems awfully bleak--the dems boo him and the republicans hate him.



I am guessing that flake will live up to his name and flake-out.
 
hope the democrats saved some Kleenex from election night 2016.

not only will Kavanaugh be confirmed but it looks like republicans could pick up a few more seats in the senate.


this means when rbg kicks the bucket trumps next nominee will sail thru.



time for Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to exact some revenge...it's time for some good old fashioned PAYBACK



HAHAHA
 
btw-I told you that the democrats would turn on the FBI when they give Kavanaugh a clean slate...I take this as a green light for trump to fire rod Rosenstein...and we all know what that means, lol...see ya later mueller


still think ya gonna impeach trump, Maxine?


hahahaha-oh happy days!!!!
 
thebigt said:
hope the democrats saved some Kleenex from election night 2016.

not only will Kavanaugh be confirmed but it looks like republicans could pick up a few more seats in the senate.


this means when rbg kicks the bucket trumps next nominee will sail thru.



time for Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to exact some revenge...it's time for some good old fashioned PAYBACK



HAHAHA
Click to expand...

Wow and I thought it was supposed to be the liberals that hated this country.
 
thebigt said:
trust me-it is...100%
Click to expand...

Everything you say is just as bad as the people you claim to hate. The only difference between you and Maxine or Hillary is who your target is. You're a nationalist who openly wants one party to ignore the Constitution to attack fellow citizens. You warn about Pence rising to power when in reality, false-Christians like yourself are the ones that would suffer the most because he is the real deal. Pride is a dangerous thing.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Everything you say is just as bad as the people you claim to hate. The only difference between you and Maxine or Hillary is who your target is. You're a nationalist who openly wants one party to ignore the Constitution to attack fellow citizens. You warn about Pence rising to power when in reality, false-Christians like yourself are the ones that would suffer the most because he is the real deal. Pride is a dangerous thing.
Click to expand...

"false-Christians like yourself" that's pretty bold!

Why do you think this young country is now the best place to live in the whole world? Our forefathers were God loving people!
Separation of church and state is to keep one religion from ruling. (Learn from others mistakes) We are all sinners by nature and will always miss the mark.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Everything you say is just as bad as the people you claim to hate. The only difference between you and Maxine or Hillary is who your target is. You're a nationalist who openly wants one party to ignore the Constitution to attack fellow citizens. You warn about Pence rising to power when in reality, false-Christians like yourself are the ones that would suffer the most because he is the real deal. Pride is a dangerous thing.
Click to expand...


if by nationalist you mean that I put America 1st you would be correct.
 
sad to say, but I fear that democrats desperation is going to lead to violence.



talk is one thing, but i do not want to see anyone of either party get physically injured.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Everything you say is just as bad as the people you claim to hate. The only difference between you and Maxine or Hillary is who your target is. You're a nationalist who openly wants one party to ignore the Constitution to attack fellow citizens. You warn about Pence rising to power when in reality, false-Christians like yourself are the ones that would suffer the most because he is the real deal. Pride is a dangerous thing.
Click to expand...

whoa, hold on for a minute...'pride is a dangerous thing'



that is really rich coming from you, lol
 
Studhorse said:
"false-Christians like yourself" that's pretty bold!

Why do you think this young country is now the best place to live in the whole world? Our forefathers were God loving people!
Separation of church and state is to keep one religion from ruling. (Learn from others mistakes) We are all sinners by nature and will always miss the mark.
Click to expand...

There's a big difference between admitting that we all sin and blindly supporting unrepentant sinners.
 
thebigt said:
if by nationalist you mean that I put America 1st you would be correct.
Click to expand...

Nationalist as in you follow exactly what the government feeds you even if it goes against your own morals or basic sense of right and wrong. That's not patriotism and it's now how this country was set from the start. The Constitution and its amendments were created with safeguards and admits that the government will not always be right.
 
Studhorse said:
"false-Christians like yourself" that's pretty bold!

Why do you think this young country is now the best place to live in the whole world? Our forefathers were God loving people!
Separation of church and state is to keep one religion from ruling. (Learn from others mistakes) We are all sinners by nature and will always miss the mark.
Click to expand...

It would be nice if most of our current crop of “god loving people” in office loved humans too. Unfortunately their “god loving” supporters are accomplices to mass murder.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Nationalist as in you follow exactly what the government feeds you even if it goes against your own morals or basic sense of right and wrong. That's not patriotism and it's now how this country was set from the start. The Constitution and its amendments were created with safeguards and admits that the government will not always be right.
Click to expand...

don't be a sore loser...didn't you say that Kavanaugh would NOT be confirmed?
 
thebigt said:
don't be a sore loser...didn't you say that Kavanaugh would NOT be confirmed?
Click to expand...

I made a prediction and it doesn't look like it will come true. Life goes on. If your piece of mind is based on the election of people who don't care about you or your interests and the idea that it gives you some sort of fake "win", then I feel pity for you. What I want is fairly simple: I want the person who honestly and legally got the most votes to be in office. If that person breaks the law, they should be removed. Your threat that Democrats should ignore investigating if Trump did anything wrong because that will leave them with Pence is one of the most unamerican things that I have ever heard.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I made a prediction and it doesn't look like it will come true. Life goes on. If your piece of mind is based on the election of people who don't care about you or your interests and the idea that it gives you some sort of fake "win", then I feel pity for you. What I want is fairly simple: I want the person who honestly and legally got the most votes to be in office. If that person breaks the law, they should be removed. Your threat that Democrats should ignore investigating if Trump did anything wrong because that will leave them with Pence is one of the most unamerican things that I have ever heard.
Click to expand...

now you really sound like a sore loser
 
thebigt said:
same thing to me...
Click to expand...

So why do you support politicians who consistently shyt all over our Constitution then? How does that make America first?

If shytting over both the same thing then that’s accurate, but that’s putting both first in last.
 
ax1 said:
So why do you support politicians who consistently shyt all over our Constitution then? How does that make America first?

If shytting over both the same thing then that’s accurate, but that’s putting both first in last.
Click to expand...

didn't you vote for Obama?
 
thebigt said:
didn't you vote for Obama?
Click to expand...

Completely different....that was 10+years ago. I have always openly acknowledged my atrocious mistake with Obama since April of ‘09 and took steps to correct them rather than repeating them. Let’s move on to 2018.
 
ax1 said:
Completely different....that was 10+years ago. I have always openly acknowledged my atrocious mistake with Obama since April of ‘09 and took steps to correct them rather than repeating them. Let’s move on to 2018.
Click to expand...

lol....
 
ax1 said:
Great thanks, :)
Click to expand...

Obama put us in this mess, if he hadn't been such an extreme leftist trump would never have had a chance and we would have a more moderate president....but-trump was a far better alternative than Hillary who quite possibly would have been even more extreme left than Obama.
 
thebigt said:
Obama put us in this mess, if he hadn't been such an extreme leftist trump would never have had a chance and we would have a more moderate president....but-trump was a far better alternative than Hillary who quite possibly would have been even more extreme left than Obama.
Click to expand...

You can’t compromise the US Constitution and claim to be “America first.” That’s putting yourself first.
 
Retired US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh's hearing performance makes him unfit
"John Paul Stevens told the Palm Beach Post that the judge's "performance in the hearings" changed his mind about supporting Kavanaugh's nomination. Nearly 1,000 law professors said they opposed Kavanaugh, who faces several allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to the 80s."

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, a lifelong Republican, told a small crowd in Boca Raton that Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s performance at confirmation hearings should disqualify him. “The Senators should pay attention to this.”

Invalid Link Removed
 
thebigt said:
Obama put us in this mess, if he hadn't been such an extreme leftist trump would never have had a chance and we would have a more moderate president....but-trump was a far better alternative than Hillary who quite possibly would have been even more extreme left than Obama.
Click to expand...

Obama’s, Hitlery and Dump’s policies are negligbly different at best.
 
justhere4comm said:
Retired US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh's hearing performance makes him unfit
"John Paul Stevens told the Palm Beach Post that the judge's "performance in the hearings" changed his mind about supporting Kavanaugh's nomination. Nearly 1,000 law professors said they opposed Kavanaugh, who faces several allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to the 80s."

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, a lifelong Republican, told a small crowd in Boca Raton that Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s performance at confirmation hearings should disqualify him. “The Senators should pay attention to this.”

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

stevens is senile, why do you think he retired...
 
ax1 said:
Obama’s, Hitlery and Dumps policies are negligible different at best.
Click to expand...

c'mon man...you don't remember the heated debate about boys who say they identify as girls showering with girls?

haven't heard that argument since trump got elected have you? Obama and hillary were off the chart with stupid ideas that were harmful to the country---you know this you are just throwing crap out there to see if it sticks.
 
thebigt said:
hope the democrats saved some Kleenex from election night 2016.

not only will Kavanaugh be confirmed but it looks like republicans could pick up a few more seats in the senate.


this means when rbg kicks the bucket trumps next nominee will sail thru.



time for Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to exact some revenge...it's time for some good old fashioned PAYBACK



HAHAHA
Click to expand...

as a lawyer and as a proud citizen, I find this take to be disturbing, dangerous and un- American. The Judges on the Court should always provide an unbiased, impartial application of the law. “ReVenge” ( i am not sure what they are getting revenge for) should never be considered. if you believe Kavanaugh’s words today, he would be offended by any claim he is going to do anything but be an impartial judge.
 
thebigt said:
c'mon man...you don't remember the heated debate about boys who say they identify as girls showering with girls?

haven't heard that argument since trump got elected have you? Obama and hillary were off the chart with stupid ideas that were harmful to the country---you know this you are just throwing crap out there to see if it sticks.
Click to expand...

Those are tiny distractions to divide people with, not real policy issues.
 
What do the following all have in common?

  • The Catholic Journal
  • The largest organization of Christian churches
  • Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens
They all think Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court and none of them are Liberals.
None of them are pro Roe v Wade.
 
primolift00 said:
as a lawyer and as a proud citizen, I find this take to be disturbing, dangerous and un- American. The Judges on the Court should always provide an unbiased, impartial application of the law. “ReVenge” ( i am not sure what they are getting revenge for) should never be considered. if you believe Kavanaugh’s words today, he would be offended by any claim he is going to do anything but be an impartial judge.
Click to expand...


are you a democrat?

if you are offended by my post you should be doubly offended by the democrats treatment of Kavanaugh. my ass unbiased and impartial application of the law the supremes vote along party line 90% of the time, get real who you trying to kid!!!

why do you think the dems are so opposed to Kavanagh, geez a 2nd grader could figure this out.
 
justhere4comm said:
What do the following all have in common?

  • The Catholic Journal
  • The largest organization of Christian churches
  • Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens
They all think Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court and none of them are Liberals.
None of them are pro Roe v Wade.
Click to expand...

you know what else they all have in common...they don't get a vote!!!
 
justhere4comm said:
Retired US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh's hearing performance makes him unfit
"John Paul Stevens told the Palm Beach Post that the judge's "performance in the hearings" changed his mind about supporting Kavanaugh's nomination. Nearly 1,000 law professors said they opposed Kavanaugh, who faces several allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to the 80s."

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, a lifelong Republican, told a small crowd in Boca Raton that Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s performance at confirmation hearings should disqualify him. “The Senators should pay attention to this.”

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Stevens take is shared by a lot of lawyers. Whether it was fair or unfair that Kavanaugh was placed in the situation of being questioned, his performance made many question whether he has the temperament to be in the Court.

Irony is, if there had been an opportunity to do a thorough investigation before the hearing, then its possible that anything that was really not credible would have been dismissed prior to the hearing. From that perspective, I thought he made a strategic mistake by not pushing for the investigation himself. Given the limited investigation that was done, at least one side of the country will be raising questions about him the rest of his life (which will not stop after his confirmation). A failure to interview many of the alleged witnesses will probably lead to at least some of them making public statements, further keeping questions about him in the public. If Kavanaugh really did not commit any of the alleged acts, that is truly unfortunate for him and his family.
 
thebigt said:
c'mon man...you don't remember the heated debate about boys who say they identify as girls showering with girls?

haven't heard that argument since trump got elected have you? Obama and hillary were off the chart with stupid ideas that were harmful to the country---you know this you are just throwing crap out there to see if it sticks.
Click to expand...

I’m actually on vacation in Tianjin China at an aquarium about to watch a dolphin show so sorry if my posts are slightly vague and short today lol

Invalid Link Removed
 
thebigt said:
c'mon man...you don't remember the heated debate about boys who say they identify as girls showering with girls?

haven't heard that argument since trump got elected have you? Obama and hillary were off the chart with stupid ideas that were harmful to the country---you know this you are just throwing crap out there to see if it sticks.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we're back to grown ass white men raping women and priests raping kids while you look the other way. Don't pretend for a second that you ever gave a **** about the actual victims. You were all up in arms about Target bathrooms and now not a word.
 
thebigt said:
are you a democrat?

if you are offended by my post you should be doubly offended by the democrats treatment of Kavanaugh. my ass unbiased and impartial application of the law the supremes vote along party line 90% of the time, get real who you trying to kid!!!

why do you think the dems are so opposed to Kavanagh, geez a 2nd grader could figure this out.
Click to expand...

I generally dislike both sides and don’t identify as either. That said read the stats, you are pretty misinformed re voting record, but I realize you are presenting solely a partisan extreme.
Invalid Link Removed

Read Kavanaugh’s op ed today, it’s pretty clear he would find your characterization to be offensive.

Ok I am bowing out.
 
ax1 said:
Obama’s, Hitlery and Dump’s policies are negligbly different at best.
Click to expand...
That's why I only vote for city and county polititions and policies; voting for president, you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't. Plus politics are so polarized anymore that I worry we're just going to have psycho after psycho for president for the foreseeable future with each new president trying to outdo the previous one in the opposite direction.
 
Anabaholic said:
That's why I only vote for city and county polititions and policies; voting for president, you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't. Plus politics are so polarized anymore that I worry we're just going to have psycho after psycho for president for the foreseeable future with each new president trying to outdo the previous one in the opposite direction.
Click to expand...

I voted for Gary Johnson last election, he might get a senate seat this year. I would consider either a repub or dem in local elections but not often.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Yeah, we're back to grown ass white men raping women and priests raping kids while you look the other way. Don't pretend for a second that you ever gave a **** about the actual victims. You were all up in arms about Target bathrooms and now not a word.
Click to expand...
wow...a true liberal response-if all else fails slander and smear. I aint taking the bait.
 
thebigt said:
wow...a true liberal response-if all else fails slander and smear. I aint taking the bait.
Click to expand...

You don't even seem to know what liberal means. You just toss it out there as an insult when somebody doesn't agree with you. And it's harsh but true. Even now you're focusing on fake stories of transgender people while ignoring real issues and using women and kids to justify your stance. Trump used it as a scare tactic to get votes and it worked, but hey it's a win, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top