Lionheart1776
Member
I've always been a futurist and deeply interested in bio-technology and radical life extension. From what I gather listening/reading to Aubrey De Gray and other prominent scientists/doctors in the fields of bio-technology, genetics, medicine etc. Unless we have some kind of major dark age happen in the next 10-30 years these fields will be able to treat a vast majority of AAS related long term health risks even the more severe ones like organ destruction! "Printable" organs have already been made and functioned successfully in labs so even if it takes 20 years to perfect this technology. No big deal!
I am not saying I am going to do this, I don't need to take major risks to meat any of my goals. But if I were to show some promise in the competitive arena I would completely go for it without regard to future health problems that I might encounter 50> my reasoning is, is either we made great strides in medicine and have a standing army of nano bots in our blood to repair our bodies, genetics therapy, etc, or we entered some kind of dark age and science stalled due to some kind of global calamity! It other words if my hopes of advanced medicine were dashed that means the world is likely now not an inviting place to live anymore at that time (In short I would welcome death due to the unbelievable disappointment I would experience in that circumstance.)
Think about it if we don't do even 1/5 of the the SENS foundations goals in 20-30 years, that means we made no notable progress in many of the most key fields in science!
Does anybody else feel this way? I can easily see how this mindset could backfire or be used as a crutch to me mindlessly reckless. That being said I've always felt this way in other domains, and hence have always been open to taking more risks than many of my peers.
I am not saying I am going to do this, I don't need to take major risks to meat any of my goals. But if I were to show some promise in the competitive arena I would completely go for it without regard to future health problems that I might encounter 50> my reasoning is, is either we made great strides in medicine and have a standing army of nano bots in our blood to repair our bodies, genetics therapy, etc, or we entered some kind of dark age and science stalled due to some kind of global calamity! It other words if my hopes of advanced medicine were dashed that means the world is likely now not an inviting place to live anymore at that time (In short I would welcome death due to the unbelievable disappointment I would experience in that circumstance.)
Think about it if we don't do even 1/5 of the the SENS foundations goals in 20-30 years, that means we made no notable progress in many of the most key fields in science!
Does anybody else feel this way? I can easily see how this mindset could backfire or be used as a crutch to me mindlessly reckless. That being said I've always felt this way in other domains, and hence have always been open to taking more risks than many of my peers.