Guest viewing is limited

Donald Trump running for president

DemntedCowboy said:
Not to mention the VA has now stopped TRT all together. They will give you a VED, and Viagra but nothing else. For TRT you have to go to an outside doctor.
Click to expand...

Indeed, my friend! I finally got on TRT a few months ago. I'm at a "Low T Center" right now... looking for a Urologist or Endo that would prescribe me a bottle at a time because Low T's model is to get you to come in for a shot every week so they can charge you!

Glad to be chatting with some fellow blue corders! 11C here!
 
hanslifts said:
I need to remember this because I was flipping out on Alex yesterday. I need to be a little more cordial. I guess just suppressing all of my frustrations for those years and Im a little frustrated. This issue hits home to me ad yhe military denied TRT because I was a few points high. Yet, girls started getting T shots, but they didn't actually need it. You can see the irony of the situation. Anyway, thanks for reminding me that this forum is supposed to be fun!
Click to expand...

I can take it as much as I can hand it out, so don't hold back, but please don't assume I'm being sincerely disrespectful. The only person I don't pull punches on in this thead is cjnator because of his bull**** "studies" supposedly saying that whites have higher IQs than black. As for the trans military debate, I am here for knowledge and I don't assume it's an easy process to properly implement them into the military. I'm on the fence regarding that issue and open to hearing other points of view. The problem I have is that this decision didn't come from military experts lobbying Trump or even the joint chiefs. I also don't buy the reason that it's about cost. When somebody wants billions for a wall that won't work, I don't take them serious when they all of the sudden become frugal.
 
got enough pause time...it's fight time!!!

hoping for Garcia, but I put $20 on broner so I win either way!!!

good night y'all
 
hanslifts said:
Indeed, my friend! I finally got on TRT a few months ago. I'm at a "Low T Center" right now... looking for a Urologist or Endo that would prescribe me a bottle at a time because Low T's model is to get you to come in for a shot every week so they can charge you!

Glad to be chatting with some fellow blue corders! 11C here!
Click to expand...
11M/11B 3 tours Iraq 18 months, Iraq 15 months, Afghanistan 4 of 9 months. 2 Purple hearts. There are new studies put there. That show that males serving in combat are suffering from Low T from what I heard while on WTU waiting to retire I will try to find the articles.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I can take it as much as I can hand it out, so don't hold back, but please don't assume I'm being sincerely disrespectful. The only person I don't pull punches on in this thead is cjnator because of his bull**** "studies" supposedly saying that whites have higher IQs than black. As for the trans military debate, I am here for knowledge and I don't assume it's an easy process to properly implement them into the military. I'm on the fence regarding that issue and open to hearing other points of view. The problem I have is that this decision didn't come from military experts lobbying Trump or even the joint chiefs. I also don't buy the reason that it's about cost. When somebody wants billions for a wall that won't work, I don't take them serious when they all of the sudden become frugal.
Click to expand...
I just dont believe in trannies in the military, just like I dont believe in Women in combat arms. Not that Im old school, they just dont belong there. Just like some men dont belong there. If you are overly emotional then you should not be in the foxhole next to me. Cause when I get shot, I need someone thats gonna do something not freakout and cry. Just like when I got my face blown off in Afghanistan. Those guys told me its not bad, and that everything was gonna be ok. They didnt say oh sh*t and start crying
 
DemntedCowboy said:
11M/11B 3 tours Iraq 18 months, Iraq 15 months, Afghanistan 4 of 9 months. 2 Purple hearts. There are new studies put there. That show that males serving in combat are suffering from Low T from what I heard while on WTU waiting to retire I will try to find the articles.
Click to expand...

Oh, I believe that 100%. In fact, I've seen it with my own eyes. Poor sleep habits, ****ty nutrition plans, and high stress environments all wreak havoc on our T. Then throw in the endless supply of Rip Its and your body is screwed. Not to mention that once I blew out my back, the endless supply of opiates and the subsequent drug and alcohol abuse that followed left me with practically nonexistent T levels.
 
hanslifts said:
Oh, I believe that 100%. In fact, I've seen it with my own eyes. Poor sleep habits, ****ty nutrition plans, and high stress environments all wreak havoc on our T. Then throw in the endless supply of Rip Its and your body is screwed. Not to mention that once I blew out my back, the endless supply of opiates and the subsequent drug and alcohol abuse that followed left me with practically nonexistent T levels.
Click to expand...
Ripits where the bomb and between the opiates, amphetamines, and everything else I was prescribed. The VA wanted to send me to the methadone clinic and I was like your crazy. The military prescribed it and now y'all are saying Im a drug addict. Here have all of it, and I havent touched them since. I was never addicted. But thats the VA's answer. And I work for the VA now, and will still tell you its horrible healthcare for our Veterans. They talk about Privatizing the VA and honestly it would probably be the best thing for some of tbese VETS
 
thebigt said:
that ceo would get short term results and then bail and not be around to pay the long term consequences
Click to expand...

This happens in the nfl all the time! Give a contract to Jay Cutler and the Bears are still trying to dig out of that hole 3 regimes later. The same thing is happening in Miami because of the Tannehil mistake.

Conversely, there is no massive leftover baggage in Cleveland or SF. The new regimes arent obligated to be competitive and seem to have the leeway to rebuild without say a big RG3 or Nick Foles obligation. Everything relates to football LOL
 
DemntedCowboy said:
I just dont believe in trannies in the military, just like I dont believe in Women in combat arms. Not that Im old school, they just dont belong there. Just like some men dont belong there. If you are overly emotional then you should not be in the foxhole next to me. Cause when I get shot, I need someone thats gonna do something not freakout and cry. Just like when I got my face blown off in Afghanistan. Those guys told me its not bad, and that everything was gonna be ok. They didnt say oh sh*t and start crying
Click to expand...

I hear what you're saying and know you've been through quite a bit (read your story in your log thread) so I completely respect that you have a way better real-world perspective that I could never fully understand. I just wonder if there is another way to measure that ability to cope with those situations for everybody and the answer may very well be that you can't know until you're actually in the situation and that would be too late. I'm also concerned that this is being done as an outright ban for serving in any capacity, but curious if there aren't some sort of opportunities in the military for transgender people.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I hear what you're saying and know you've been through quite a bit (read your story in your log thread) so I completely respect that you have a way better real-world perspective that I could never fully understand. I just wonder if there is another way to measure that ability to cope with those situations for everybody and the answer may very well be that you can't know until you're actually in the situation and that would be too late. I'm also concerned that this is being done as an outright ban for serving in any capacity, but curious if there aren't some sort of opportunities in the military for transgender people.
Click to expand...
As I said in the past, if they arent in combat arms, and if we go back to President Clintons rule of Dont ask Dont tell. I have no problem with it. Dont serve in Combat roles, and please if I dont ask if you wear a dress on the weekend amd suck **** then dont tell me about it. Same with women, if you want to be a man, dont think that qaulifies you for combat arms, be a mechanic or something non combat, and if you like licking ****** just dont tell me about it. Cause I aint asking you about it
 
I think it could be argued that men, with their much higher test production, are able to withstand more stress before panicking, given lower cortisol levels.
More test also equal more dopamine which means more focus and persistence.
Also, more strength and endurance.
I love women and I respect them a lot but I would choose a male platoon to cover my ass when the **** hits the fan.
 
DemntedCowboy said:
Look here bitch, I aint his attorney or his gf. I just dont like people attacking people for making a straightup comment. Seems like you are the one with issues. I served my country and defend any president. Even the ones I didnt vote for, and I will defend anyone else from morons making stupid accustations. Why dont you go hangout with heyboy
Click to expand...

I like to go out if there's a party or go to the movies, but I just like hanging out with my buddies and having a good time.
 
I must be missing an inside joke from another thread, because I have no idea who heyboy even is. rtmilburn doesn't seem to be a fan though
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I must be missing an inside joke from another thread, because I have no idea who heyboy even is. rtmilburn doesn't seem to be a fan though
Click to expand...
No one's a fan heyboy he is a tool. He likes to copy and paste lame(usually false) qoutes from google. Interrupts peoples serious threads to do it and won't leave my person above you thread alone. He is just a tool bag troll that Admin won't get rid of
 
rtmilburn said:
No one's a fan heyboy he is a tool. He likes to copy and paste lame(usually false) qoutes from google. Interrupts peoples serious threads to do it and won't leave my person above you thread alone. He is just a tool bag troll that Admin won't get rid of
Click to expand...
He's a mildly entertaining troll you keep feeding...
 
rtmilburn said:
No one's a fan heyboy he is a tool. He likes to copy and paste lame(usually false) qoutes from google. Interrupts peoples serious threads to do it and won't leave my person above you thread alone. He is just a tool bag troll that Admin won't get rid of
Click to expand...

Looks like he's gone now.
 
celc5 said:
This happens in the nfl all the time! Give a contract to Jay Cutler and the Bears are still trying to dig out of that hole 3 regimes later. The same thing is happening in Miami because of the Tannehil mistake.

Conversely, there is no massive leftover baggage in Cleveland or SF. The new regimes arent obligated to be competitive and seem to have the leeway to rebuild without say a big RG3 or Nick Foles obligation. Everything relates to football LOL
Click to expand...
this scenario could easily be applied to business and politics...great post!!!
 
thebigt said:
this scenario could easily be applied to business and politics...great post!!!
Click to expand...

I saw the fight late this morning, what did you think? (that is a way of me making sure you saw it too, no spoilers, lol!)

Im not really a MMA guy but I also saw that UFC main event, was especially interested due to it not expecting a ground fest.
 
ax1 said:
I saw the fight late this morning, what did you think? (that is a way of me making sure you saw it too, no spoilers, lol!)

Im not really a MMA guy but I also saw that UFC main event, was especially interested due to it not expecting a ground fest.
Click to expand...

that fight sucked...broner didn't even put up a fight he was in defense mode the entire fight...his corner kept telling him he can't win if he doesn't throw any punches...very disappointing fight!!!

mikey Garcia is solid, but can't really judge how good he might do against the better fighters based on that sorry assed fight!!!

glad Garcia won even though it cost me 20 bucks cash with potential to win 50.
 
thebigt said:
that fight sucked...broner didn't even put up a fight he was in defense mode the entire fight...his corner kept telling him he can't win if he doesn't throw any punches...very disappointing fight!!!

mikey Garcia is solid, but can't really judge how good he might do against the better fighters based on that sorry assed fight!!!

glad Garcia won even though it cost me 20 bucks cash with potential to win 50.
Click to expand...

Garcia is sharp....fundamentals are on point and consistent. This is my 6th or 7th fight I saw, I really think he a very good fighter.

I expected more competition from Broner, I was actually surprised how lopsided it was. Broner was very very disappointing.

I wouldnt call Garcia great yet, but he has an opportunity to do so with a few more competitive fights. Once Lomenchenko destroys that piece of dump he is fighting I think a fight with Garcia at 135 would be freaking awesome. I think Garcia is too small for 147 though, something that cost Broner greatly in recent times. Maybe Errol Spence at 140? Errol is looking to stay at 147 though, lots of good fights for him, he (Errol) can be king of division, the potential is there but who knows till we see it.
 
ax1 said:
Garcia is sharp....fundamentals are on point and consistent. This is my 6th or 7th fight I saw, I really think he a very good fighter.

I expected more competition from Broner, I was actually surprised how lopsided it was. Broner was very very disappointing.

I wouldnt call Garcia great yet, but he has an opportunity to do so with a few more competitive fights. Once Lomenchenko destroys that piece of dump he is fighting I think a fight with Garcia at 135 would be freaking awesome. I think Garcia is too small for 147 though, something that cost Broner greatly in recent times. Maybe Errol Spence at 140? Errol is looking to stay at 147 though, lots of good fights for him, he (Errol) can be king of division, the potential is there but who knows till we see it.
Click to expand...

my friend, I can't see Garcia beating lomachenko, but he would give him his best match up so far...remember that gary russel jr was rated very high when he faced lomachenko. spence is like the charlo twins, he really hasn't faced top competition yet.
 
thebigt said:
my friend, I can't see Garcia beating lomachenko, but he would give him his best match up so far...remember that gary russel jr was rated very high when he faced lomachenko. spence is like the charlo twins, he really hasn't faced top competition yet.
Click to expand...

I actually agree with you on that one....I just think its the best next fight for both and can help propel either career. I would put my money on Lomenchenko, he is nasty good.

Spence beat a bigger Kell Brook, I thought Brook was a very good fighter I had him beating Spence. Brook however is another who hasnt fought enough top names as of yet. I still see Kell Brook near the top of the division...not saying "great" just saying very good and good to make some interesting matches soon.

There are some nice options setting up for 2018 in welterweight.
 
ax1 said:
I actually agree with you on that one....I just think its the best next fight for both and can help propel either career. I would put my money on Lomenchenko, he is nasty good.

Spence beat a bigger Kell Brook, I thought Brook was a very good fighter I had him beating Spence. Brook however is another who hasnt fought enough top names as of yet. I still see Kell Brook near the top of the division...not saying "great" just saying very good and good to make some interesting matches soon.

There are some nice options setting up for 2018 in welterweight.
Click to expand...

dude...kell brooks WAS a good fighter...until GGG beat the crap out of him...he was coming off that beat down when he faced spence!!!

you are right there are some great match ups to be made but getting top fighters to fight other top fighters just doesn't happen often enough, imo.

I've heard canelo is going to wuss out of the GGG fight....
 
thebigt said:
dude...kell brooks WAS a good fighter...until GGG beat the crap out of him...he was coming off that beat down when he faced spence!!!

you are right there are some great match ups to be made but getting top fighters to fight other top fighters just doesn't happen often enough, imo.

I've heard canelo is going to wuss out of the GGG fight....
Click to expand...

I guess he was just trying to make a paycheck, I thought he was stupid for fighting ggg.

I didn't hear about that with Canelo...I have ggg winning that fight but I'm not too confident.
 
ax1 said:
I guess he was just trying to make a paycheck, I thought he was stupid for fighting ggg.

I didn't hear about that with Canelo...I have ggg winning that fight but I'm not too confident.
Click to expand...

that's the inside dope...canelo is looking for a way while saving face. look for him to stall as long as possible....kinda like Floyd did with manny-wait until he gets older and loses a step.
 
thebigt said:
that's the inside dope...canelo is looking for a way while saving face. look for him to stall as long as possible....kinda like Floyd did with manny-wait until he gets older and loses a step.
Click to expand...

I heard about that with Floyd too but that sounded illogical being that Floyd is aging at the same pace by the day and is older than Manny. I didn't believe it makes no sense unless Floyd was some 5 years younger or so.
 
ax1 said:
I heard about that with Floyd too but that sounded illogical being that Floyd is aging at the same pace by the day and is older than Manny. I didn't believe it makes no sense unless Floyd was some 5 years younger or so.
Click to expand...

because many was in much tougher fights based on his aggressive style. Floyd was a counter puncher with amazing defensive skills, manny was an attacker who took a lot of punches on the way in, manny is a short guy and needed to get close, Floyd stayed on the outside and jabbed....see where i'm going?
 
thebigt said:
because many was in much tougher fights based on his aggressive style. Floyd was a counter puncher with amazing defensive skills, manny was an attacker who took a lot of punches on the way in, manny is a short guy and needed to get close, Floyd stayed on the outside and jabbed....see where i'm going?
Click to expand...

Very valid I can see that....maybe his political career path had influence to stall as well which took a toll on the boxing career.
 
ax1 said:
Very valid I can see that....maybe his political career path had influence to stall as well which took a toll on the boxing career.
Click to expand...

yeah, after his last fight I think many should retire...he is very popular in the philipines and is set up for 10 lifetimes.
 
thebigt said:
yeah, after his last fight I think many should retire...he is very popular in the philipines and is set up for 10 lifetimes.
Click to expand...

He had some bad tax issues a while back in his home country, it was in the millions. I dunno what came of that. The last fight imo he won, but I would call it the worst pathetic win in entire career, lol. The old pac would have destroyed Horn. Hang it up Pac-ma, keep them brain cells especially if your effecting public policies.

Who did you have in the GGG/Canelo fight? Cant remember.
 
ax1 said:
He had some bad tax issues a while back in his home country, it was in the millions. I dunno what came of that. The last fight imo he won, but I would call it the worst pathetic win in entire career, lol. The old pac would have destroyed Horn. Hang it up Pac-ma, keep them brain cells especially if your effecting public policies.

Who did you have in the GGG/Canelo fight? Cant remember.
Click to expand...

tripleG all the way...but like I said I don't look for it to happen anytime soon.
 
Invalid Link Removed

Written by Invalid Link Removed
Monday July 31, 2017


Invalid Link Removed

President Trump seems to be impatiently racing toward at least one disastrous war. Maybe two. The big question is who will be first? North Korea or Iran?

Over the past several days President Trump has sent two nuclear-capable B-1 bombers over the Korean peninsula to send a clear message that he is ready to attack North Korea. On Saturday he blamed China for North Korea’s refusal to cease its missile tests. He Tweeted: “I am very disappointed in China… they do nothing for us with North Korea, just talk. We will no longer allow this to continue.”

One press report from an unnamed Pentagon source claimed that President Trump “is to order a military strike against North Korea within a year,” after this weekend’s North Korean test of a longer-range missile.

Iran, which along with North Korea and Russia will face new sanctions imposed by Congress and expected to be signed into law by Trump, is also in President Trump’s crosshairs. He was reportedly furious over his Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s certifying that Iran was in compliance with the nuclear deal – even though Iran was in compliance – and he seems determined to push a confrontation.

Twice in the past week the US military has fired at Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf. On Tuesday an Iranian military ship in the Persian Gulf was warned off by machine gun blasts from a US Naval vessel. Then on Friday the US Navy fired warning flares toward another Iranian ship operating in the Persian Gulf.

Imagine if the US Navy had encountered Iranian warships in the Gulf of Mexico firing machine guns at them when they approached the Iranians.

Facing new sanctions, the Iranian government announced that it will not end ballistic missile testing even under US pressure. The missile program is not a violation of the P5+1 Iran deal unless it is specifically designed to carry nuclear weapons.

So whom will Trump attack first? Let’s hope nobody, but with continuing pressure from both Democrats and Republicans over the unproven “Russiagate” allegations, it increasingly looks like he will seek relief by starting a “nice little war.” If he does so, however, his presidency will likely be over and he may end up blundering into a much bigger war in the process.

Although Trump’s bombastic rhetoric on Iran and North Korea has been pretty consistent, the American people voted Trump because he was seen as the less likely of the two candidates to get the US into a major war.

A recent study by the Boston University and the University of Minnesota concluded that Trump won the most votes in parts of the country with the highest military casualties. Those most directly suffering the costs of war were attracted to the candidate they saw as less likely to take the US into another major war. These are the Americans living in the swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan that surprised the pundits by voting for Trump over Hillary.

Will Trump’s legacy be blustering us into one or two wars that will make Iraq and Afghanistan look like cakewalks by comparison? Millions dead? It’s time to make our voices known before it’s too late!

Copyright © 2017 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
I don't understand this logic - the US is getting mad because NK has long range missles? Who got mad when the US developed their own? Why can't NK have what the rest of the world has already have developed? Then the US makes it worse by flexing it's muscles in the region, yet if NK did the same the US would cry about it even more.

God the US military has some broken logic.

Sure, they come across as unstable but that's because of the picture the US paints. They have weapons that are capable of being intercepted with some degree of reliability.

Leave them the **** alone
 
If I had armies constantly harassing me by sending war ships into the region, and playing it off as though they are the worlds saviors, id be nervous as well.

The US can freely invade other regions, send warships to their surrounding waters and yet claim it's the other nations we must be afraid of
 
Jiigzz said:
I don't understand this logic - the US is getting mad because NK has long range missles? Who got mad when the US developed their own? Why can't NK have what the rest of the world has already have developed? Then the US makes it worse by flexing it's muscles in the region, yet if NK did the same the US would cry about it even more.

God the US military has some broken logic.

Sure, they come across as unstable but that's because of the picture the US paints. They have weapons that are capable of being intercepted with some degree of reliability.

Leave them the **** alone
Click to expand...

Whats funny is we gave DPRK the nuclear technology (weaponizable type) in the '90 under Clinton in the first place. Under the Clintons, also shared the high tech missile systems with China (enough to help them with their space program) which eventually leaked and shared with DPRK.

The US miltary doesnt have broken logic....its all about feeding the Military Industrial Complex beast with massive cash-flow from the tax payers,satisfying stocks and mega-contractors..the politicians who support all this get their endless support to consistently be elected and re-elected. Its all about money, power and corruption. Its 100% logical, from their point of view anyways.

None of this has anything to do with DPRK being a threat or Iran, etccc...we need constant reasons to have other countries be scared shytfaces so they let our empire in as well as shytfacing our own people so we dont complain about a 600billion dollar military budget and keep voting these maggots into power.

Wars are great for the economics of a small elite here and nothing will change as long as people keep here voting in the the single party duopoly Republicrat and Demican system begging to help them keep all of us safe.
 
ax1 said:
Whats funny is we gave DPRK the nuclear technology (weaponizable type) in the '90 under Clinton in the first place. Under the Clintons, also shared the high tech missile systems with China (enough to help them with their space program) which eventually leaked and shares with DPRK.

The US miltary doesnt have broken logic....its all about feeding the Military Industrial Complex beast with massive cash-flow from the tax payers and satisfying their stocks and the politicians who support all this get their endless support to consistently be elected and re-elected. Its all about money, power and corruption. Its 100% logical, from their point of view anyways.

None of this has anything to do with DPRK being a threat or Iran, etccc...we need constant reasons to have other countries be scared shytfaces so they let our empire in as well as shytfacing our own people so we dont complain about a 600billion dollar military budget and keep voting these maggots into power.

Wars are great for the economics of a small elite here and nothing will change as long as people keep here voting in the the single party duopoly Republicrat and Demican system begging to help them keep all of us safe.
Click to expand...
Amen to that
 
hanslifts said:
Actually, none of them knew of the plan. And you're right, although it's not official yet, it will happen. And the majority of the leadership does want this issue over with the end result of trans folks gone. Im sure you believe everything on CNN that you see, but a lot of the info has been inflated, exaggerated, etc. But believe what you want. Anyway, what the **** do you know you? Did you serve? Or are you just a keyboard warrior that specializes in military policy? Again, **** off.
Click to expand...
Who is the real keyboard warrior here, bro?
 
ax1 said:
Actually it is a mental illness if you go by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders by American Psychiatric Association. Its called Gender Dysphoria.

Other than that, in my books you love freedom and a government so small you can barely see it, can pass a physical just like everyone else with no exceptions your all cool in my books to go out and fight even if your cookoo a little. Born a dude, you gotta stay out of the ladies room however.
Click to expand...
I think you are misinterpreting Gender Dysphoria.

It refers to the distress caused by the feeling that you are a different gender than assigned at birth. Not the actual feeling like you are a different gender. Very different.

The distress can be related to *******s calling you mentally ill because you feel that way.
 
Misfit28 said:
I think you are misinterpreting Gender Dysphoria.

It refers to the distress caused by the feeling that you are a different gender than assigned at birth. Not the actual feeling like you are a different gender. Very different.

The distress can be related to *******s calling you mentally ill because you feel that way.
Click to expand...

Isnt that what a trangender does, feel like they should have been born that way? They feel like they should have been a different gender at birth? Im not sure what Im not getting right or what you thought my misinterpretation was. Imo I would think that is a mental illness, same reason I think Cat-lady over in the Netherlands has a mental illness because she thinks she should have been a cat at birth.

I see no way transgenders not having distress even if nobody was pointing mental illness accusations at them. Its simply not accepting yourself for who you are and going to extreme means of changing yourself, which is of course a mental illness especially when cutting your organs off. That is a big reason for distress.
 
I also lol'd when the US called Iran threatening, when the US were in the Persian Gulf with Nimitz!

Imagine if Iranian warships entered the Gulf of Mexico and claimed the US were provocative LOL
 
I want to share a story, but 1st let me say this is just my theory I don't have facts, studies or the answer to why bieber is popular-so don't ask...

I think trump lost confidence in priebus, and asked his buddy scaramucci for a favor-hey mooch come on board for a few days and help get rid of piebus...once priebus was gone trump made a deal with general Kelly-say getting rid of scarramucci is your idea-this accomplishes two things-1st for those who thought general Kelly is just a yes man this disproves that, and 2nd of course is that priebus is gone and trump doesn't look like the bad guy....

i'm giving trump a lot of credit...unlike many I think trump is very good at playing the game.
 
thebigt said:
I want to share a story, but 1st let me say this is just my theory I don't have facts, studies or the answer to why bieber is popular-so don't ask...

I think trump lost confidence in priebus, and asked his buddy scaramucci for a favor-hey mooch come on board for a few days and help get rid of piebus...once priebus was gone trump made a deal with general Kelly-say getting rid of scarramucci is your idea-this accomplishes two things-1st for those who thought general Kelly is just a yes man this disproves that, and 2nd of course is that priebus is gone and trump doesn't look like the bad guy....

i'm giving trump a lot of credit...unlike many I think trump is very good at playing the game.
Click to expand...

even IF any of this is true, your theory confirms Kelly as a yes man because then he came on simply to do the job that Trump didn't have the balls to do. He's doing his dirty work like a well-trained dog. Also, twice over Trump is a ***** that couldn't just fire people and instead has to play games with tax payer money. Oh yeah, great leader there!

How about this theory, he is in over his head, has absolutely no strategy, and is making it up as he goes along poorly. He can't even put a decent team together.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top