justhere4comm
Banned
is it weird that I read all of your posts in the voice of the Family Guy character in your avatar?
Well. It fits

is it weird that I read all of your posts in the voice of the Family Guy character in your avatar?

They are complaining about an all male cabinet when there's only 4 people confirmed so far.
That is pretty bizarre. Maybe he was drunk tweeting?Remember when Donald Trump had a fixation with Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson. Just bizarre behavior for an old man like that.
Now, he's our President. lol.
Invalid Link Removed
That is pretty bizarre. Maybe he was drunk tweeting?
That is pretty bizarre. Maybe he was drunk tweeting?
I dropped out of Harvard law school after only 2 years so my legal knowledge is somewhat limited....what do you guys think of trumps travel ban? to me it looks like LEGALLY it should go thru, no matter what you think of the policy.
It definitely should go through in my opinion, I dont see what the problem is.
the problem is the policy itself, imo....legally I can't see any issue, but I'm not a legal expert.
I would have rolled it out a little differently...people with green cards were screwed a but, and those that already have visas could have been told not to come....cross world flights just suck trust me, lol. The world isnt perfect. I do not believe this has anything to do with Muslims as a whole.
yes, I agree there were kinks in the beginning. if the opposition could prove that it is a ban on a religion I believe that is the only leg they could stand on, but I think that legally it is impossible to prove, without letting personal beliefs interfere.
Even if it was, Im not saying its right but even if it was a ban on a religion, why would it be a legal requirement for the US government to protect the religious rights of non-American citizens?
Invalid Link Removed can you really trust politicians?
Invalid Link Removed can you really trust politicians?
Invalid Link Removed
This guy should hold no more power than a meter maid, and maybe not even that.
The President of the United States of America joking about destroying someone's career.
He wishes.
Invalid Link Removed
LOL
Invalid Link Removed
Crazy
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Doesnt seem as bad as that previous dictator claiming "Im good at killing people."
Great meme! It's perfectly idiotic and takes it's place right next to all the Hitler memes.
The reality:
A rich privileged person who's family gave the GOP in upwards of $200,000,000.00 in donations has a seat of power in Trump's Administration.
What makes her qualified for the position?
I'd love to see that resume.
It's heartening as well.
I mean, anyone can do anything! I believe it now, so I'm going to apply for NASA; NFL; NBA, and the NHL! I think I got a shot. I just have to come up with $200,000,000.00 to donate and secure my chances.
Even if it was, Im not saying its right but even if it was a ban on a religion, why would it be a legal requirement for the US government to protect the religious rights of non-American citizens?
"foreign nationals are generally entitled to the equal protection of the laws, to political freedoms of speech and association, and to due process requirements of fair procedure where their lives, liberty, or property are at stake"
Invalid Link Removed
Further:
The Constitution does distinguish in some respects between the rights of citizens and noncitizens: the right not to be discriminatorily denied the vote and the right to run for federal elective office are expressly restricted to citizens.12 All other rights, however, are written without such a limitation.
I think the biggest issue was that he was stopping legal citizens from re-entering. The above seems to apply to aliens which is fair enough IMO.Check this out, direct source to the law too. Most relevant to Dump's case.
Invalid Link Removed
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Invalid Link Removed
"foreign nationals are generally entitled to the equal protection of the laws, to political freedoms of speech and association, and to due process requirements of fair procedure where their lives, liberty, or property are at stake"
Invalid Link Removed
Further:
The Constitution does distinguish in some respects between the rights of citizens and noncitizens: the right not to be discriminatorily denied the vote and the right to run for federal elective office are expressly restricted to citizens.12 All other rights, however, are written without such a limitation.
I think the biggest issue was that he was stopping legal citizens from re-entering. The above seems to apply to aliens which is fair enough IMO.
Poor choice of word, I did mean green card holders and legal residentsWhich legal citizens? Did they really deny citizens? Do you mean "green card" holders? They are not citizens. My wife has a residence card she is still considered an alien.
Haha won't argue with that!Just so you know, Government here has a rich history of discrimination, inequality, doesnt respect due process, craps on our US Constitution, discriminates based on religion and political beliefs, etc of American citizens to this day... to keep it short.....So by default, where Im sitting its hard for me to stand of for foreign nationals when American's themselves are currently being shytting on lol
Which legal citizens? Did they really deny citizens? Do you mean "green card" holders? They are not citizens. My wife has a residence card she is still considered an alien.
I think the biggest issue was that he was stopping legal citizens from re-entering. The above seems to apply to aliens which is fair enough IMO.
Green card holders are still aliens, not citizens.
Fair enough. But let's show distinction between foreigners who have never been to the US and those who reside there.
Great meme! It's perfectly idiotic and takes it's place right next to all the Hitler memes.
The reality:
A rich privileged person who's family gave the GOP in upwards of $200,000,000.00 in donations has a seat of power in Trump's Administration.
What makes her qualified for the position?
I'd love to see that resume.
It's heartening as well.
I mean, anyone can do anything! I believe it now, so I'm going to apply for NASA; NFL; NBA, and the NHL! I think I got a shot. I just have to come up with $200,000,000.00 to donate and secure my chances.
Do you think Trump wouldnt have changed his mind to exempt people if he didn't think he had to?Ultimately the law is the law, that Ax1 posted. That law hasn't been challenged in the past, and presidents republican and democrat have used it to stop people from "immigrating" or coming in to the US from specified countries. Including Obama when he stopped all immigration from Iraq. Or Carter stopping all immigration from Iran. And a travel ban is just that. If you are a citizen, no problem. But green card holders getting caught up still didn't violate the law, which again hasn't been challenged in a court. Then Trump amended his proclamation by giving exemption to green card and visa holders, as well as foreign interpreters. Which he didn't have to do by the law, that hasn't been challenged in court before.
Do you think Trump wouldnt have changed his mind to exempt people if he didn't think he had to?
This is trump were talking about. The reason he changed his mind is because his decision would have been thrown in his face had he tried to push it
I just saw a poll that shows that most European's want immigration ban from muslim majority country's.
Do you think Trump wouldnt have changed his mind to exempt people if he didn't think he had to?
This is trump were talking about. The reason he changed his mind is because his decision would have been thrown in his face had he tried to push it
Had to LEGALLY or in order to save face? Legally he didn't have to. To save face, absolutely he needed to.
Had to LEGALLY or in order to save face? Legally he didn't have to. To save face, absolutely he needed to.
FWIW, I have no issue with the ban itself; it's your country and you deserve the right to protect it any way you see fit. However what I disagree with is that you are making the victims out to be the bullies, when the US itself created ISIS and caused a tonne of issues in the middle east. You created these issues, and now you are blocking those seeking refuge from your ****-up.