Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

I got a good laugh out of this



I suppose they must also believe what they don't and didn't see her doing isn't and won't hurt them. Weak!
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Seriously wtf?! She's a horrible role model. Or how about how we watched her husband lie to the country?
Click to expand...

We have a need a new barber dimwit being accused of being a bad role model paid for by a well established lying mass genocidalist and one of these two will be commander in chief.

We are F'ed, lol
 
Wow...this thread is tipping left. Guess the 13 blackberry's, the c on emails was not for confidential but for alphabetical order.

You guys are so silly
 
AE14 said:
Wow...this thread is tipping left. Guess the 13 blackberry's, the c on emails was not for confidential but for alphabetical order.

You guys are so silly
Click to expand...

Some here still value equanimity, even though they get hit from both sides. :)
 
As long as it's balanced I am fine with it. Everyone deserves criticism. However, here it's just Trump. It shouldn't be that way
 
AE14 said:
As long as it's balanced I am fine with it. Everyone deserves criticism. However, here it's just Trump. It shouldn't be that way
Click to expand...

F'Dump, F'Hitlery and at the very moment F'Lil'Johnson too!
 
AE14 said:
As long as it's balanced I am fine with it. Everyone deserves criticism. However, here it's just Trump. It shouldn't be that way
Click to expand...

I don't see how you can say that. A lot of the posts, including the ones directly before your post, were bashing Hillary. This is an equal hate, we're all screwed zone.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I don't see how you can say that. A lot of the posts, including the ones directly before your post, were bashing Hillary. This is an equal hate, we're all screwed zone.
Click to expand...
Come on. You have to admit it's a tad one sided here. While I understand as Trump is a cartoon character. HRC is awful and shouldn't be allowed to work in any government position considering the negligence in her FBI "interview". It's pathetic how people are closing ranks around her to protect her even after she threatened war with Russia over their supposed hacking.
 
AE14 said:
Come on. You have to admit it's a tad one sided here. While I understand as Trump is a cartoon character. HRC is awful and shouldn't be allowed to work in any government position considering the negligence in her FBI "interview". It's pathetic how people are closing ranks around her to protect her even after she threatened war with Russia over their supposed hacking.
Click to expand...

On don't know about this board as a whole, but you couldn't be more off in regards to this thread. Recently especially, I'd say more people are either pro-Trump or anti both of them.
 
Matthandyo said:
Invalid Link Removed
Guess trump is pro legalization
Click to expand...
Honestly if alcohol and tobacco are legal there is no reason weed should be. Less harmful in pretty much every aspect then either of them. Plus has some legitimate medical uses (sure most "medical" uses are a bull but there are indeed some legitimate ones)
 
You really think Trump is going to put himself in a position to get photographed with people smoking weed? Remember Trump was never in the Choom Gang.
 
Hitlery had another coughing fit...that hoe may drop dead any moment. She is sick as a mo'fo.
 
It'd be fun to watch them debate and Trump say something like "you know, I'm just sayin'...but do hard working Americans want a President that looks like she could have a stroke any minute...I mean...I don't know...that's what the polls are sayin'..I don't know..." and she stroke out.

Invalid Link Removed

I'm sorry...:D
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

Clinton News Network poll has Trump taking the lead overy Kilary.
Click to expand...

I've been trusting polls less and less now. You realize that most of the respondents (more than half) are reached via landline? 64% of Americans don't even have landlines, especially younger voters. I haven't had a landline for a LONG time. Landline voters are older, more rural, less educated and poorer.

For instance in the poll you listed, there were 601 landline respondents and 400 cell phone respondents.

I wonder which voters were captured the most out of that sample?

Also, that poll listed 28% self-described Democrats, 32% self-described Republicans and 40% independents.
 
Misfit28 said:
I've been trusting polls less and less now. You realize that most of the respondents (more than half) are reached via landline? 64% of Americans don't even have landlines, especially younger voters. I haven't had a landline for a LONG time. Landline voters are older, more rural, less educated and poorer.

For instance in the poll you listed, there were 601 landline respondents and 400 cell phone respondents.

I wonder which voters were captured the most out of that sample?

Also, that poll listed 28% self-described Democrats, 32% self-described Republicans and 40% independents.
Click to expand...

f' polls....the only thing that matters are the people that count the vote on election day.
 
ax1 said:
f' polls....the only thing that matters are the people that count the vote on election day.
Click to expand...
You mean what the Electoral College votes?
 
ax1 said:
Well...those are still actual votes. I meant whoever counts the votes...or we can also add, whoever buys for the votes.
Click to expand...

Just wanna add the election new high tech machines are top secret propriety owned by a private corporation backed by George Soros. There is no transparency. In order for someone from the outside to win you have to have an outstandingly high support of the public as to where they are unable to count the votes enough to their favor and prevent social unrest and civil war.
 
ax1 said:
Just wanna add the election new high tech machines are top secret propriety owned by a private corporation backed by George Soros. There is no transparency. In order for someone from the outside to win you have to have an outstandingly high support of the public as to where they are unable to count the votes enough to their favor and prevent social unrest and civil war.
Click to expand...

You mean this rumor?

Invalid Link Removed

Even The Blaze, started by Glenn Beck, says it is false.......
 
Misfit28 said:
You mean this rumor?

Invalid Link Removed

Even The Blaze, started by Glenn Beck, says it is false.......
Click to expand...

Glenn Beck also debunks 9/11 truth movement virtually completely destroying any credibility he has....which is none.
 
Misfit28 said:
I've been trusting polls less and less now. You realize that most of the respondents (more than half) are reached via landline? 64% of Americans don't even have landlines, especially younger voters. I haven't had a landline for a LONG time. Landline voters are older, more rural, less educated and poorer.

For instance in the poll you listed, there were 601 landline respondents and 400 cell phone respondents.

I wonder which voters were captured the most out of that sample?

Also, that poll listed 28% self-described Democrats, 32% self-described Republicans and 40% independents.
Click to expand...

The point is they've been polling people for months with similar sample size. Their polls have gone from Hilary dominating Trump to now being behind. If the same or similar metrics are used, it illustrates the shift of support.
 
ax1 said:
I dont pay much attention to Glenn Beck, he is a piece of human filth in my eyes.
Click to expand...

I used his site to show that I wasn't using "liberal bias". SMH.

I use a left wing affiliated site, and I get accused of being a bleeding heart liberal. I use a right wing site and get told it's a sham as well. I give up, LOL.
 
youngandfree said:
The point is they've been polling people for months with similar sample size. Their polls have gone from Hilary dominating Trump to now being behind. If the same or similar metrics are used, it illustrates the shift of support.
Click to expand...

Wrong again. The latest poll is from "likely voters", not registered voters.
 
Misfit28 said:
I used his site to show that I wasn't using "liberal bias". SMH.

I use a left wing affiliated site, and I get accused of being a bleeding heart liberal. I use a right wing site and get told it's a sham as well. I give up, LOL.
Click to expand...

Glenn Beck is part of the phony libertarian sect just like most of the phony liberal media (soros, Obama, Hitlery, MSNBC, etc....) sect out there.

There is a reason Glenn Beck has been getting alot of mainstream airtime as of late, including CNN. He is on the "in."

When it comes to the truth, there is no left/right bias. Truth is the truth.
 
youngandfree said:
The point is they've been polling people for months with similar sample size. Their polls have gone from Hilary dominating Trump to now being behind. If the same or similar metrics are used, it illustrates the shift of support.
Click to expand...

Isnt it funny how Obama just last month was calling people who were concerned about rigged elections as conspiracy theory tin foil hat people...and now Obama is coming out and saying Russia is conspiring to rig the election so he want to Federalize the election? Damn...one everything is Federalized (thats a if) then shyt really hits the fan on our democracy.
 
ax1 said:
Glenn Beck is part of the phony libertarian sect just like most of the phony liberal media (soros, Obama, Hitlery, MSNBC, etc....) sect out there.

There is a reason Glenn Beck has been getting alot of mainstream airtime as of late, including CNN. He is on the "in."

When it comes to the truth, there is no left/right bias. Truth is the truth.
Click to expand...

However, the Soros thing is far from "truth". Alex Jones is pushing that story, so that lets me know a little something ;)
 
Wow, I know one thing. I would hate to live in fear of everything and think that everything is a sinister conspiracy. That's not life, IMO.
 
Misfit28 said:
However, the Soros thing is far from "truth". Alex Jones is pushing that story, so that lets me know a little something ;)
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with Alex Jones...Soros has done this all my himself. He is a corrupt evil war mongering azz. His recent email leaks showed how he supported the vast europe immigration to destabilize it, have illegals flood the US to influence the vote to overthrow the country....he openly supported the overthrow of the Ukrainian government with those terrorists (Nazi sect) in the Ukraine to destabilize that and have the EU take it over. He is a Nazi sympathizer and needs to be put away for his WWII crimes...I can keep going how evil and corrupt that BLM supporting ignorant A'hol but my eyes are starting to get bloody.
 
Misfit28 said:
Wow, I know one thing. I would hate to live in fear of everything and think that everything is a sinister conspiracy. That's not life, IMO.
Click to expand...

Your the one living in fear and mass paranoia begging for big government dependency, exchange personal liberty in exchange for security and to grab everyone's guns. My life is just fine.
 
Misfit28 said:
Wrong again. The latest poll is from "likely voters", not registered voters.
Click to expand...

The poll follows several national polls in August suggesting that the margin between the two candidates had tightened following the conventions. A CNN Poll of Polls analysis released Friday showed that Clinton's lead had been cut in half when compared with the height of her convention bounce.

From the article.
 
Here's an interesting article illustrating the party of progress vs the party of time gone by. What would Dr. King think about blacks openly requesting government sanctioned segregation when the true civil rights leaders fought and we're killed for blacks' right to integrate with whites?
Invalid Link Removed
 
youngandfree said:
The poll follows several national polls in August suggesting that the margin between the two candidates had tightened following the conventions. A CNN Poll of Polls analysis released Friday showed that Clinton's lead had been cut in half when compared with the height of her convention bounce.

From the article.
Click to expand...

If you actually look at the poll itself, it describes the participation rates. That's my point. All of the previous polls only had registered voters. The latest one had a mix of "likely" and registered voters. That might make a bit of a difference. That's all I'm saying.
 
youngandfree said:
Here's an interesting article illustrating the party of progress vs the party of time gone by. What would Dr. King think about blacks openly requesting government sanctioned segregation when the true civil rights leaders fought and we're killed for blacks' right to integrate with whites?
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

From reading the article, it seems that it is due to the price of housing. You make it seem as if they are willingly segregating themselves purely because of so-called "race". Have you seen housing prices in California?
 
Thiefcatcher said:
Nope, it's got nothing to do with race...

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

I didn't see that. Thanks for linking it!

Here's some more interesting material:

Invalid Link Removed

I also looked at CSU LA's crime report, and it lists no hate crimes at all. However, as the report I linked above states, hate crimes tend to be under reported due to intimidation and fear of retaliation, etc.

Here's the question: If that coalition feels that Blacks are being victimized on campus, are you going to say that they aren't? I'm genuinely curious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top