dr gisante
New member
- Awards
- 0
Are supplements that activates ampk good because it supress mTOR ?
I'd do the same. It goes better with a cut.Before your largest meal(s) that are away from your lift should be a great time
I'd save it for a cut though, overall
and why exactly would the weight loss while taking an ampk simulator not favor fat? this is in the context, that that the body prefers to burn glucose->fat->muscle (no?) it sounds like what youre saying is that it changes that preference.It's become a touchy topic because many ingredients can also slow lean mass growth.
There are more "blockers" than Partitioners on the market.
GLUT-4 targeting are probably the most overall beneficial to a BB/physique guy
Stoke up the path we know leads to LBM gain and shuttling to muscle tissue.
On a cut, you'll likely have fat loss as priority and ampk may help you drop weight faster. I would not say this weight loss is favourably fat
(I don't see any partitioning edge from it, I lose the same fat/LBM ratio as I would on any cut)
For some reason I'm not understanding what your saying. Can you rephrase please?Placebo being dieting without a supplement, it would not burn fat preferentially in comparison.
Order stays the same for substrate use.
In no way am I saying it changes preference, quite the opposite.
As a "GDA" or "partitioner" I would not bother with this.and why exactly would the weight loss while taking an ampk simulator not favor fat? this is in the context, that that the body prefers to burn glucose->fat->muscle (no?) it sounds like what youre saying is that it changes that preference.
gotcha, i see where you were going with that, and to be fair i did say "it sounds like.." rather than meaning to come off argumentative.Placebo being dieting without a supplement, it would not burn fat preferentially in comparison.
Order stays the same for substrate use.
In no way am I saying it changes preference, quite the opposite.