AnabolicGuru
Well-known member
Which is better for those of you who have ran both? Pros/cons and what was different between the compounds in terms of strength and size
Which is better for those of you who have ran both? Pros/cons and what was different between the compounds in terms of strength and size
I've run both and personally liked epi a bit better. Strength was about even, body comp slightly better with epi, mass wasn't the focus for either for me so can't say much there but epi kept me "tighter" and had more "feel" when on cycle
What dose did you run mdiaz at?
I really love epi, I haven't run dbol but I can only assume what I feel like on epi is close to that feeling of euphoria. It's definitely from a good percentage of it converting to phera. I really believe so.
Most reviews I've read about mdiaz were underwhelmed users and a few disappointments.
I'm sure it's good for certain goals. If epi was totally gone, mdiaz would def be my 2nd go to for sure.
Epi is tried and true. I would go for that.
Im about to run epi,furuza,Dymethazine (**** manifested) kinda scared of loosing any hair though. I've done 2 past cycles with triumphalis and nano mithras deffinetly one of the best stacks out there to get shredded.
Epi is tried and true. I would go for that.
interesting. What dose are you goig to run it at?From what I've heard the Methyldiaz should be better for bulk/size and Epi being better for a cut. No personal exp. with it though. I choose Mdiaz over Epi for my next run.
I suggest to start at 60mg and try 80 at week 3. Many suggest 40 as starting dose but even stacked that was not even near the sweet spot
I'm bro believer that Epi does convert a bit to phera aka DMT aka madol in the body. There is definite enough evidence that somewhat proves it does in the body. Also possibly as it degrades or due to heat exposure. I felt euphoric as all hell on epi and I can't stop thinking about how great I felt on the stuff. I'm so excited for my next epi cycle.I ran the Methyldiaz a few days at 40 before adding Dimethandrostenol.
I weight 90 kg and Epistane @30 was more stronger at 20mg than Methyldiazirhinol at 40.
However I am not talking about the amount muscle its building or how much it helped with recovery. I'm talking about the feeling and strength its adding.
However the stack is shining at 60/30.
What were differences in effects of the compounds for you? Goals?Personally I liked 45mg better of Mdiaz than I did 40mg of epi, both for 6 weeks. To each there own, both are solid chooses either way.
Personally I liked 45mg better of Mdiaz than I did 40mg of epi, both for 6 weeks. To each there own, both are solid chooses either way.
Run seperately? What dose with the mdiaz and length?
The **** manifested is all in one stack
Dymethazine 30 mg
Epistanr 30 mg
Furazabol 150 mg
5ahydroxy 20 mg
Carbopol 20 mg
All per one cap so it's pretty much a potent shredder just scared of losing hair from all this
The triumphalis I took at 60 mg stacked with nano mithras I think at .5 ml twice a day for 6 weeks then bridged with 11kt and formeron also took on cycle. Then pct with cardarine plus anafuse and toremefine my favorite SERM. Really good cutting cycle and didt even shed hair. But for some reason I did with the LGI triumphalis.But OG Iron Legion brand was deffinetly better if you can still find it. You can also search for my posts I think It says the exact dosages I took.
Lgi Triumphalis isn't as good as the Iron Legion?
I thought Triumph was better for both Mass and Strength for me.... It was little more of a slow build, but by week 3 it was great.
Which is better for those of you who have ran both? Pros/cons and what was different between the compounds in terms of strength and size
What benefits started around week 3?
Was it very dry? No good feel/alpha while on it? And what dose and weight were you?Solid increases in both Mass and Strength, with new PR's every workout began in week three and ran thru 6, but the first two weeks not a ton of noticeable results.
Was it very dry? No good feel/alpha while on it? And what dose and weight were you?
I just did 45mg / day for 6 weeks . I am on TRT so I decided not to go crazy with the dosage. It was pretty dry, not the driest compound I have ever run, but certainly not wet. I didn't get much of an Alpha feeling on it, though I can't say I have ever really felt that on anything I have tried in the past (Phera, Halo, Epi, SD, T-Var, M1A, SDMZ2 etc..) so take it for what its worth.
As for weight, I started at 320 and finished at 335.
Damn, 15lbs?I just did 45mg / day for 6 weeks . I am on TRT so I decided not to go crazy with the dosage. It was pretty dry, not the driest compound I have ever run, but certainly not wet. I didn't get much of an Alpha feeling on it, though I can't say I have ever really felt that on anything I have tried in the past (Phera, Halo, Epi, SD, T-Var, M1A, SDMZ2 etc..) so take it for what its worth.
As for weight, I started at 320 and finished at 335.
Damn, 15lbs?
You kept most of it?
Some are saying it's not that great till around 60mg and you're a big guy too...
Damn which should I run this or dianodrol for the summer run lol
Which is better for those of you who have ran both? Pros/cons and what was different between the compounds in terms of strength and size
Read peoples experience with Triumph and that's it just like an under-dosed Epi. Read that Epi is much much much better.
Damn, 15lbs?
You kept most of it?
Some are saying it's not that great till around 60mg and you're a big guy too...
Damn which should I run this or dianodrol for the summer run lol
Still if you were able to gain 15lbs at your weight that's pretty incredible. Was it a lean bulk?The strength gains stuck, which is great but I dropped 5 of the 15lbs. No big deal, I was looking more for the strength gains anyway.
I had seen a few logs at 45mg that went well, so I went with that dosage.
I have never given dianodrol a good solid run, so I cant help you on that.
Still if you were able to gain 15lbs at your weight that's pretty incredible. Was it a lean bulk?
I think dianodrol would be a better choice for the summer time.
Yea, a lot of people actually liked it better than epi from what I heard. Plus, the nutrient partitioning effects of it seem to make it a better bulker, there is a lot of feedback on the compound at prohormeforum
Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?
I am agreeing that it does seem to be an underdosed epistane, but the compound does seem to have more benefits and less sides
Ok how do you figure it has more "benefits and less sides"?. The majority of the people in this thread say the exact opposite and pretty much everywhere else.