Guest viewing is limited

Shazeezee it's time to get stupid big 18 week cycle log

Thanks my man! And i might do some more research on GW. I'm not too knowledgable of it at the moment. I will update if I add it because I still have a long time left

When I scratch up the funds I'll be running it with my cycle.
 
I was thinking NPP

Dude, NPP at 150-200mg EOD is AMAZING youll trip, it will put mass on you too so be careful.. but its awesome on joints and pumps and has that aggression like tren but not the sides, but im tellin you, get that tne or boom mix with tren/test base, pop it an hour before and youll be so freaking pissed off nothing will stop you.... theres also methylnandrolone which is scairy strong and you can only run it a couple weeks.. or halotestin.. maybe anadrol..
 
As in the SARM?

GW1516 is a pde5 inhibitor, it destroys the cardio effects of tren so you can breath and go twice as far.. check it out man!;
Liquid GW501516 or GW-1516 (Cardarine) is the most selective and potent PPARβ agonist. Studies demonstrate that GW501516 can regulate expression of genes involved in lipid catabolism and energy uncoupling in skeletal muscle cells.
 
GW1516 is a pde5 inhibitor, it destroys the cardio effects of tren so you can breath and go twice as far.. check it out man!;
Liquid GW501516 or GW-1516 (Cardarine) is the most selective and potent PPARβ agonist. Studies demonstrate that GW501516 can regulate expression of genes involved in lipid catabolism and energy uncoupling in skeletal muscle cells.

Isnt Cialis a PDE5 inhibitor? Would running Cialis with Tren be a good idea then? Sorry never looked into this
 
Hold up, gw isn't a pde5 inhibitor. It is a ppar delta modulator. It regulates the various proteins that the body uses for energy. It also allows the body to use more glucose as energy instead of fat storage. GW is in no way related to cialis
 
GW1516 is a pde5 inhibitor, it destroys the cardio effects of tren so you can breath and go twice as far.. check it out man!; Liquid GW501516 or GW-1516 (Cardarine) is the most selective and potent PPARβ agonist. Studies demonstrate that GW501516 can regulate expression of genes involved in lipid catabolism and energy uncoupling in skeletal muscle cells.
"GW501516 (also known as GW-501,516, GW1516, GSK-516 and Endurobol[2]) is a PPARδ receptor agonist that was previously investigated for drug use by GlaxoSmithKline. The drug was discovered to cause cancer in rats and GlaxoSmithKline has ceased development......However, researchers from GSK later presented findings of the adverse effects of giving GW501516 to rats and mice for two years at the 2009 meeting of the Society of Toxicology. The compound was found to significantly increase the chances of developing cancer and development of the drug was subsequently halted."


Stay safe
 
"GW501516 (also known as GW-501,516, GW1516, GSK-516 and Endurobol[2]) is a PPARδ receptor agonist that was previously investigated for drug use by GlaxoSmithKline. The drug was discovered to cause cancer in rats and GlaxoSmithKline has ceased development......However, researchers from GSK later presented findings of the adverse effects of giving GW501516 to rats and mice for two years at the 2009 meeting of the Society of Toxicology. The compound was found to significantly increase the chances of developing cancer and development of the drug was subsequently halted."


Stay safe

They left out the fact that the amounts they administered to the rats were almost 200% above what a human would take, and they ran the tests for months and months. No sane person would run a protocol like that.
 
T swift was just shedding light... Hahaha. But this is all interesting stuff I definitely want to keep looking into this. I appreciate all the post yall
 
And that's worth the risk?

Is it worth the risk getting in a car? Is it worth the risk flying in a plane? Everything has risks. Everything given in large enough quantities and for long enough periods will cause some kind of cancer. I read a study in college about overdosing mice on vitamin c. The mice developed brain cancer. ALL of them. Just trying to show the study was flawed compared to normal human use.
 
Is it worth the risk getting in a car? Is it worth the risk flying in a plane? Everything has risks. Everything given in large enough quantities and for long enough periods will cause some kind of cancer. I read a study in college about overdosing mice on vitamin c. The mice developed brain cancer. ALL of them. Just trying to show the study was flawed compared to normal human use.

You don't have one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies ceasing research and losing amazing amounts of money on vitamin C...a naturally occurring vitamin.

And no, I don't believe driving a car is as risky; maybe a car with a fuel leak while I'm chain smoking cigarettes in traffic.
 
Hold up, gw isn't a pde5 inhibitor. It is a ppar delta modulator. It regulates the various proteins that the body uses for energy. It also allows the body to use more glucose as energy instead of fat storage. GW is in no way related to cialis

yea I was just re-reading my post, my apologies!! thanks yates for picking up my fumble!! lol MTPMJM as for Cialis people do take that pre-workout and report better blood circulation and pumps, NEVER tried it myself, but ive seen several logs and stories about it.. once again my apologize for getting them mixed up!
 
They left out the fact that the amounts they administered to the rats were almost 200% above what a human would take, and they ran the tests for months and months. No sane person would run a protocol like that.

yea, they always give those rats human doses, of whateve their testing,,
 
Hold up, gw isn't a pde5 inhibitor. It is a ppar delta modulator. It regulates the various proteins that the body uses for energy. It also allows the body to use more glucose as energy instead of fat storage. GW is in no way related to cialis

Did you pull that answer right out your butt? A+!
 
Did you pull that answer right out your butt? A+!

I've been doing a lot of research on sarms and research chemicals lately so yes, it came straight out of the arse. KilaCali I figured it was just a slip or an auto correct! Easy to mix all this stuff up
 
I've been doing a lot of research on sarms and research chemicals lately so yes, it came straight out of the arse. KilaCali I figured it was just a slip or an auto correct! Easy to mix all this stuff up

definitely, but thanks anyways cause I wouldn't wanna be giving the wrong info! check out this study I just came across about higher test levels from being abstinent lol I know way off topic but pretty interesting, guess the losers like me who don't get none can really benefit!;

Endocrine response to masturbation-induced orgasm in healthy men following a 3-week sexual abstinence.
Invalid Link Removed
 
definitely, but thanks anyways cause I wouldn't wanna be giving the wrong info! check out this study I just came across about higher test levels from being abstinent lol I know way off topic but pretty interesting, guess the losers like me who don't get none can really benefit!;

Endocrine response to masturbation-induced orgasm in healthy men following a 3-week sexual abstinence.
Invalid Link Removed

I remember a study done saying about length of testosterone supplementation should be short as on the 8-10 week Mark myostatin increases making gains more difficult if you don't up the doses or add more juice. Can't find it now though
 
I remember a study done saying about length of testosterone supplementation should be short as on the 8-10 week Mark myostatin increases making gains more difficult if you don't up the doses or add more juice. Can't find it now though

you know I just seen that too! something about the longer your on the more your myostatin increases hindering your gains, maybe some o that epicatechin would really make a difference
 
you know I just seen that too! something about the longer your on the more your myostatin increases hindering your gains, maybe some o that epicatechin would really make a difference

Well I'd imagine it is a safety mechanism, as putting so much mass on in a short period of time is hard on the body ie. Heart, liver, tendons, etc. so not sure if we should listen to the body or not but I think adding something to stop the myostatin from doing its job could lead to several injuries, but idk never read any logs about people using inhibitors on cycle especially the strong ones like follostatin
 
Well I'd imagine it is a safety mechanism, as putting so much mass on in a short period of time is hard on the body ie. Heart, liver, tendons, etc. so not sure if we should listen to the body or not but I think adding something to stop the myostatin from doing its job could lead to several injuries, but idk never read any logs about people using inhibitors on cycle especially the strong ones like follostatin

very interested concept.
 
Alright guys I was
Going to switch to Eq or NPP but I think I'm about to just submit my order to continue te king tren. Strength is getting stupid on just test and tren
 
Alright guys I was
Going to switch to Eq or NPP but I think I'm about to just submit my order to continue te king tren. Strength is getting stupid on just test and tren

I'm coming off tren going to npp this week just npp and test e a little over 14.5 weeks left in pre comp
 
I'm coming off tren going to npp this week just npp and test e a little over 14.5 weeks left in pre comp

npp is awesome, I think Tren/Npp/Test is the best! what you run your tren and test at? and npp? ive switched to every day pins for this last week, Tren 100mg/Test 75mg/NPP 50mg ED plus blasting tNe/tren base 50/50 2x week on hard days.
 
[eQUOTE=mixedup;4992160]Do you like it that high at eod? I like to split anyting over 100mg[/QUOTE]


Yeah I actually lowered my test a little and upped the tren advised by a
Friend and its been about two weeks and it's been awesome strength and size gains
 
Do you like it that high at eod? I like to split anyting over 100mg

I've learned atleast with me and reading through SEVERAL logs and threads on different forums that the ED dosing protocol with tren cuts waaay down on the sides cause it keeps everything more stable, cause I noticed I could feel the difference by the day on those middle days I could feel the drop in levels so I decided to try the ED and I like it, I wish I had enough NPP to do 100mg ED, I think npp is just about my favorite so far, but the tri-fecta is the best all together, would you say test at a lower dose ED then the tren and NPP is better? I amost want to run the test at 100 as well but im not sure how that would work, I think npp and tren at 100ed would be nice. ive heard some mythical reports of two 19nors batteling over the progesterone receptor and so fourth, you think theres any truth? and any reason why your keeping the NPP at eod? and you runnin test with your tren and npp?
 
Back
Top