New York Attorney General Targets Supplements

baldymcgee

baldymcgee

Member
...at major retailers

Invalid Link Removed

"Three out of six herbal products at Target — ginkgo biloba, St. John’s wort and valerian root, a sleep aid — tested negative for the herbs on their labels. But they did contain powdered rice, beans, peas and wild carrots. And at GNC, the agency said, it found pills with unlisted ingredients used as fillers, like powdered legumes, the class of plants that includes peanuts and soybeans, a hazard for people with allergies."

The recent prohormone ban was just the beginning. I think there will be more action taken by the government, if sh!t like this keeps popping up.
 
Thats going to continue to happen because these companies are being shady and selling something deviant from what they advertirse, which is dangerous and unethical.
furthermore the government wants to make more money.
 
baldymcgee said:
...at major retailers

Invalid Link Removed

"Three out of six herbal products at Target -- ginkgo biloba, St. John's wort and valerian root, a sleep aid -- tested negative for the herbs on their labels. But they did contain powdered rice, beans, peas and wild carrots. And at GNC, the agency said, it found pills with unlisted ingredients used as fillers, like powdered legumes, the class of plants that includes peanuts and soybeans, a hazard for people with allergies."

The recent prohormone ban was just the beginning. I think there will be more action taken by the government, if sh!t like this keeps popping up.
Click to expand...

Companies keep giving them a reason to do it.
 
I suspect that this isn't deviousness or duplicity on the part of the retailers -- rather, it's complacency from those retailers combined with duplicity of suppliers.

If you look at Invalid Link Removed, affected are the store brands for Walmart, Walgreens, Target, and GNC. I have a hard time believing that all of these companies would be using such ugly and risky tactics to squeeze just a little more out of the bottom line, especially in the case of places like Walmart and Target where supplements likely aren't even a significant portion of their revenue.

Instead, what we likely have here are Chinese suppliers offering "too good to be true" deals on raws that these companies are gobbling up without doing adequate QA or validation on, leading to bunk products.

I imagine some of the premier brands are going to seize on this opportunity to offer forth their own reassuring 3rd-party testing, which is well-deserved publicity for them in keeping a better chain of custody on their ingredients.
 
^^Their prices are pretty high
 
I sometimes wish there was an official regulating/testing agency for supplements - separate from the FDA. But then I think how that might cause a lot of unnecessary bans.
 
Ah, Preet Bahara or Cyrus Vance? Jokers, the lot of them. Ban, ban, ban, ban.... worked well with alcohol.
 
You would think with the price you pay at GNC at least they could verify whats in there products, anyways wlagreens, walmart doesnt surprise me, this is no different than those cheap protein powders being bunk fillers and very little protein. Thats why i cut down on my supps and stick to very few reliable brands now. Its sad but its probably not even the manufacturer faults, just like we go for the cheapest product so do they.
 
ericool007 said:
You would think with the price you pay at GNC at least they could verify whats in there products, anyways wlagreens, walmart doesnt surprise me, this is no different than those cheap protein powders being bunk fillers and very little protein. Thats why i cut down on my supps and stick to very few reliable brands now. Its sad but its probably not even the manufacturer faults, just like we go for the cheapest product so do they.
Click to expand...

Well, you mean it's not the supplier's fault. The manufacturers absolutely know what they are doing.

The suppliers should verify that the product they buy is legit. It's on them too.
 
baldymcgee said:
...at major retailers

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/...®ion=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=Blogs

"Three out of six herbal products at Target — ginkgo biloba, St. John’s wort and valerian root, a sleep aid — tested negative for the herbs on their labels. But they did contain powdered rice, beans, peas and wild carrots. And at GNC, the agency said, it found pills with unlisted ingredients used as fillers, like powdered legumes, the class of plants that includes peanuts and soybeans, a hazard for people with allergies."

The recent prohormone ban was just the beginning. I think there will be more action taken by the government, if sh!t like this keeps popping up.
Click to expand...

NY is trying to regulate a bunch of things recently. Such as vaping.

It sometimes feels like that since marijuana is technically legal now that they are trying to clamp down on other things instead.
 
kissdadookie said:
NY is trying to regulate a bunch of things recently. Such as vaping. It sometimes feels like that since marijuana is technically legal now that they are trying to clamp down on other things instead.
Click to expand...
like the size of fountain drinks you can purchase or the banning of salt. NY has tried to to get some crazy legislation passed. It's ok though...California is equally as crazy.
 
Wut
 
Jiigzz said:
Wut
Click to expand...
idk who the what is to but if it's my post just google ny salt and fountain drink legislation. It was 2010 and 2012 I believe.
 
I agree. It's like the meat packing industry after Sinclair published "The Jungle" ....some things need to be brought to light and companies need to be held accountable. That being said... There needs to be a line. Our government seems to have no problem taking things over in their entirety. Regulation is good but there needs to be balance.
 
Afi140 said:
I agree. It's like the meat packing industry after Sinclair published "The Jungle" ....some things need to be brought to light and companies need to be held accountable. That being said... There needs to be a line. Our government seems to have no problem taking things over in their entirety. Regulation is good but there needs to be balance.
Click to expand...

My thing with regulation is that I have no problem with having them, it's that the people regulating often don't really know what they are doing because the regulations aren't getting input by neutral experts on the things being regulated.
 
Just tossed out my store brand melatonin and "ordorless garlic". I had already been thinking they hadn't been doing anything. Willing to bet they're bunk.
 
So they took one study from a questionable lab using questionable testing on questionable samples.

Yep our guvmint at work.
 
kissdadookie said:
My thing with regulation is that I have no problem with having them, it's that the people regulating often don't really know what they are doing because the regulations aren't getting input by neutral experts on the things being regulated.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It's Catch 22: If you leave it up to the free market, big business will stick ground up flies in your sausage to make a profit (hello 2008 financial crash!). If you whine and want big nanny government to make all the scary things go away, they will F it up because ALL government in incompetent at EVERYTHING - and you will get screwed over some how. The VA and Social Security are prime examples.

I don't know what the answer is, but it's usually not "more government", at least in my opinion. Maybe better laws allowing these sham companies to be sued out of existence is the answer... and people taking responsibility for what they swallow...there *is* an internet, go look up that garlic you're about to swallow and if everyone says it sucks, don't buy it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top