I understand what you mean but steroids do a lot more then give you an edge when it comes to bodybuilding. They are everything. You CAN NOT be competitive in professional bodybuilding without them period. Thats just a fact
Oh I agree. But I also know that u can't be competitive without a disciplined diet and routine.
The reason I KNOW steroids are talked up too much is because I have had FAR more gear in my system in the past and was in far less impressive shape then too. I also know that u can run tons and tons of gear and never get lean and never get competition ready. This directly suggests that regardless of using steroids, TUT and consistency still play the key role to results. Until u hit pro status, being "Conditioned" as the judges call it (aka lean) matters more than anything else on stage. Steroids do very little to get u lean. They do tons to help u retain lean mass and indirectly contribute to even growing mass but never actually partaking in direct fat burning or direct muscle building.
This obviously doesn't apply to GH use though as it has direct pathways to both fat burning and muscle growth.
I say all this because whether u care to acknowledge it or not, steroids cannot make a bodybuilder all alone. They r not everything because alone they do not produce comp ready results without other things first being in place. Eating 6-8 fat-burning meals a day and weight- training everyday with healthy portions of cardio are what allow steroids to really shine. Thing is, the steroid-user must do the EXACT same dang thing that a natty guys does to get lean but his results on PED's r simply more exaggerated. Hence, "performance-enhancing" drug.
I don't think much changes at all from natty to PED's. Natty guys try so hard to differentiate themselves from the way gear users make progress but honestly it's not different at all. It's just that natty guys are at about a 2-4 times slower pace than PED's users and with a nuch, much lower ceiling for ur potential. You're hormonal makeup will peak and begin to decline before u ever make it to that steroid-like size. But did the roids-users work less hard? Heck no!
Other times, it's not the pace of gains made as much as it is the ability to stay lean in the process. Running GH or GHS peps will keep u relatively lean while allowing absurd amounts of carbs to gain weight. This same approach to eating is used by natty guys but instead of sitting at 12% at the end of their bulk, they end up around 18-20%. Think about it man. We do the same things it's just PED's exaggerates the results. The rules f physiology and metabolism don't change when u take gear. They r simply amplified.
If the human body was capable of staying in a "hormonal peak" all the way thru our 50's and 60's, I'm certain some people could accomplish similar feats of size, strength and growth in a natty state as the steroid-users do in a relatively shorter period. To finish up, I'm saying that no natty person has authority or the right to say that using PED's is a matter of work-ethic. For most of us it is not. It is simply necessary to compete. That is all. We do the same things. We train hard, heavy and frequent, even when we don't want to do it and we eat those stupid bland meals of chicken, rice, potatoes, oatmeal, egg whites and fish on the regular. For many of ua, we also do ALOT of cardio to get ripped.
Now what ISNT fair is genetics! That's the most unfair, biasing aspect of all physical sports - the fact that some can do what others cant...and this is something they didn't earn! They were BORN this way. How is THAT fair?!?! At least steroids help level the playing field and gives those average genetics a chance to compete. A good example? Branch Warren...