So we had a huge thread titled "I am for phil" thread which was essentially an outrage over the suspension for Phil Robertson. Phil Robertson was suspended by A&E over the remarks he made during an interview. As a consequence of his comments in the interview he was suspended and then came the outrage. People were crying that this was a violation of his constitutional first amendment right, that this was an example of the man coming down on the little guy, that Phil was just standing up for what is morally right and was being attacked for standing for it, that he was being condemned for his morals, etc.
So the thread kinda lost traction and spun off in a lot of different ways. So instead of posting this question in that thread I decided to ask it in a new thread.
My question is: Where is the "I am for Chris Kluwe" thread at? Where is the outrage for him?
For those unfamiliar with what happened to Chris see - I Was An NFL Player Until I Was Fired By Two Cowards And A Bigot
Basically he was fired for standing up for his morals and defending the rights of others. Big difference between Robertson and Kluwe (other than the obvious one about which side of the issue they stand on) is that with Kluwe we know that his actions didn't violate his contract and with Robertson we don't. (Robertson most likely did violate his contract considering that he was suspended for the specific incident and if it wasn't stipulated in his contract A&E would be setting themselves up for a lawsuit).
So to everyone who was defending Robertson in the "I am for phil" thread I am curious to know, where do you stand on this?
So the thread kinda lost traction and spun off in a lot of different ways. So instead of posting this question in that thread I decided to ask it in a new thread.
My question is: Where is the "I am for Chris Kluwe" thread at? Where is the outrage for him?
For those unfamiliar with what happened to Chris see - I Was An NFL Player Until I Was Fired By Two Cowards And A Bigot
Basically he was fired for standing up for his morals and defending the rights of others. Big difference between Robertson and Kluwe (other than the obvious one about which side of the issue they stand on) is that with Kluwe we know that his actions didn't violate his contract and with Robertson we don't. (Robertson most likely did violate his contract considering that he was suspended for the specific incident and if it wasn't stipulated in his contract A&E would be setting themselves up for a lawsuit).
So to everyone who was defending Robertson in the "I am for phil" thread I am curious to know, where do you stand on this?