Rob112^3...That means cubed guys. See what I did?

smoker145 said:
Id take him my qb
Click to expand...

If he were Chip's QB, Chip would have to alternate between blowing him and threatening to hit him with a hammer. I don't think Philly would do much better with him.
 
herderdude said:
If he were Chip's QB, Chip would have to alternate between blowing him and threatening to hit him with a hammer. I don't think Philly would do much better with him.
Click to expand...

Not now. In a year or two they'll be better and more of a threat.

He would play so well for chip... Damn if only.

Offense would be strong
 
smoker145 said:
Well see.

Most rushing yards for qb in history.

Well see
Click to expand...

No.

Cool. I just looked up who had the most passing yards by a wide receiver, but I couldn't find it, because NOBODY CARES.

Just no. He never lived up to his potential, never played in a super bowl, never was the best quarterback in the league, never was in the top 3, AND he spent time in jail.

It's the Hall of Fame. Not the Auditorium of Really Good Players.
 
Lol this escalated quickly again. Herd I'm right there with you. I think if they taught him to see the field a little more and be a little smarter with where and how he throws the ball, he could make some major improvements with substantial carryover to the teams success. But it's those few bad choices in the game that condemn him.
 
smoker145 said:
Sammy Baugh
Click to expand...

Shut the fück up. Sammy Baugh's numbers in the 40s = Peyton Manning's numbers this year. So you just made an excellent case for Peyton to be in the Hall. Except that's not up for debate.

Baugh: Best QB of his generation.
Vick: Best QB on his team most of the time.
 
Rushing qbs are becoming popular now. You guys need to wake up.

And so what how long ago he played. That don't change his stats. If anything it was easier to play then
 
smoker145 said:
Rushing qbs are becoming popular now. You guys need to wake up.

And so what how long ago he played. That don't change his stats. If anything it was easier to play then
Click to expand...

Stat's are contextual e.g. comparing the deadball era to the 90's in baseball.
 
Rodja said:
Stat's are contextual e.g. comparing the deadball era to the 90's in baseball.
Click to expand...

We compare Ruth's stats with today's stats all the time. He played a long time ago. So did many of the greats today's players stats and season records are compared to
 
smoker145 said:
We compare Ruth's stats with today's stats all the time. He played a long time ago. So did many of the greats today's players stats and season records are compared to
Click to expand...

That's one person from the era and the GOAT in baseball not the entire league in the era and he's barely part of the era as a hitter. How about this: ERA's from then and now? Career starts and wins? The HoF is about being dominate in your generation and not your stats compared to decades prior to when you played. In the 80's 50 goal scorers where ubiquitous in hockey. Now, it's a huge deal if one player gets there.
 
smoker145 said:
Rushing qbs are becoming popular now. You guys need to wake up.

And so what how long ago he played. That don't change his stats. If anything it was easier to play then
Click to expand...

How do these things even make sense in your head?

Rushing QBs are popular. Yes. They are. Doesn't matter. What's the QB's #1 job? Winning. #2 job? Passing. #3 Job? Managing the game. #4 job is running the ball. Numbers two and three could be switched, but that's it. Do you disagree with my premises on the QB's responsibilities?

It's like saying Hines Ward should be in the Hall because he's the best blocking wide receiver of his era.

When he played doesn't matter? Frank "Home Run" Baker never hit more than twelve home runs in a season, and his nickname was HOME RUN. He got in the Hall for being a power hitter. A power hitter with 96 career home runs. Fast forward to live ball. George Foster hit 50 in 1977 alone. Not in the Hall. How does when a player played not matter?
 
Why is Namath in ? Stat wise he shouldn't be.

What Bc of that superbowl win? His numbers aren't that good at all.

If he is in, then a lot of " very good" plsyers should be also
 
smoker145 said:
Why is Namath in ? Stat wise he shouldn't be.

What Bc of that superbowl win? His numbers aren't that good at all.

If he is in, then a lot of " very good" plsyers should be also
Click to expand...

2-time MVP, icon of the game, first person to pass for 4,000 yards, changed the game. Again, it's ALL circumstantial when it comes to numbers. The games constantly evolve.
 
herderdude said:
How do these things even make sense in your head? Rushing QBs are popular. Yes. They are. Doesn't matter. What's the QB's #1 job? Winning. #2 job? Passing. #3 Job? Managing the game. #4 job is running the ball. Numbers two and three could be switched, but that's it. Do you disagree with my premises on the QB's responsibilities? It's like saying Hines Ward should be in the Hall because he's the best blocking wide receiver of his era. When he played doesn't matter? Frank "Home Run" Baker never hit more than twelve home runs in a season, and his nickname was HOME RUN. He got in the Hall for being a power hitter. A power hitter with 96 career home runs. Fast forward to live ball. George Foster hit 50 in 1977 alone. Not in the Hall. How does when a player played not matter?
Click to expand...

Qbs job is to win. How does he do that? By scoring... How does he do that? By driving the ball down field.

It doesn't matter how does it? Does it take away from a win if Wilson runs for a 30 yard Td or passes for one?

I'd have to check foster stats . Just cause you hit a lot in one year, doesn't justify it,
 
smoker145 said:
Why is Namath in ? Stat wise he shouldn't be.

What Bc of that superbowl win? His numbers aren't that good at all.

If he is in, then a lot of " very good" plsyers should be also
Click to expand...

Namath is in because he guaranteed a win over the superior NFL and delivered, because he fücked models and partied with legendary celebrities, and because he signed for $100,000 in the 70s. How do you not get that the Hall is a popularity contest? And dog killers aren't popular.

Tell you what. I'll bet you ten thousand dollars that Mike Vick doesn't get in the Hall of Fame before 2040, or whenever the first one of us dies. I'll put you in my will.
 
Rodja said:
2-time MVP, icon of the game, first person to pass for 4,000 yards, changed the game. Again, it's ALL circumstantial when it comes to numbers. The games constantly evolve.
Click to expand...

A career losing qb with a. 50% completion percentage,

But sure he gets in while others don't.

Kenny stabler...
 
Rodja said:
How have you gotten this far in life with this inability to comprehend information? Context, FFS.
Click to expand...

What Bc of the different times?

Stabler played during the same time and his numbers are much better. I believe he won an MVP too.

Yet Bc he didn't make a prediction he gets the boot
 
smoker145 said:
Qbs job is to win. How does he do that? By scoring... How does he do that? By driving the ball down field.

It doesn't matter how does it? Does it take away from a win if Wilson runs for a 30 yard Td or passes for one?

I'd have to check foster stats . Just cause you hit a lot in one year, doesn't justify it,
Click to expand...

You're right, it doesn't matter how you win, because the QBs only job is winning. Matt Hasselbeck has 93 wins to Vick's 60. So if Vick is HOF, then Hasselbeck is first ballot.
 
herderdude said:
You're right, it doesn't matter how you win, because the QBs only job is winning. Matt Hasselbeck has 93 wins to Vick's 60. So if Vick is HOF, then Hasselbeck is first ballot.
Click to expand...

Well Idk cause guys like Namath are in. Career losing records. But they were greats of their time so it doesn't matter
 
How have you guys not figured out there is no getting through to smoker?

All he cares about are some arbitrary numbers that mean nothing in the sport. Hell, he even thought Tebow was a better QB than Peyton Manning.
 
smoker145 said:
What Bc of the different times?

Stabler played during the same time and his numbers are much better. I believe he won an MVP too.

Yet Bc he didn't make a prediction he gets the boot
Click to expand...

Namath's HoF resume was already done by the time Stabler came to prominence. However, that entire point is moot as neither of them played even remotely in the same era as Vick. Vick was never considered one of top-5 in the league and, sans a 10 game stretch, was a mediocre QB in arguably the Golden Age of QB's.
 
Rodja said:
Namath's HoF resume was already done by the time Stabler came to prominence. However, that entire point is moot as neither of them played even remotely in the same era as Vick. Vick was never considered one of top-5 in the league and, sans a 10 game stretch, was a mediocre QB in arguably the Golden Age of QB's.
Click to expand...
Stabler should be in. I can't understand why he isn't

Edit: I'm done arguing thou.

I don't feel like the hof contains all the plsyers it should, and feel like it contains some who shouldn't be
 
I'll say this, mcnabb should not be in the hof . If he does, The hof should be disbanded
 
Rodja said:
There's not a case for him. McNabb has a better case than Vick. Hell, Hasselbeck has a better case than Vick.
Click to expand...

I agree.


Honestly, as an eagles fan, I don't see how smoker could hate McNabb and love Vick.


McNabb said:
During his tenure with the Eagles, he led the Eagles to four consecutive NFC East division championships (2001,*2002,*2003, and*2004), five NFC Championship Games (2001,*2002,*2003,*2004, and*2008), and one*Super Bowl*(Super Bowl XXXIX, in which the Eagles were defeated by the*New England Patriots). Perhaps his most memorable play has become known as "4th and 26", which took place against the*Green Bay Packers*in the final minutes of a*2003 NFC Divisional playoff game. In 2004, he became the first quarterback in league history to throw for more than 30 touchdowns and fewer than 10 interceptions in a season. He also became the Eagles' all-time leader in career wins, pass attempts, pass completions, passing yards, and passing touchdowns.
Click to expand...
 
Was the best rushing qb of his time... Bomb, he was unique and a star ... Thsts why he should be in. Put atlsnta on the map
 
Jim- and it all amounts to one big didappointment.

He had great teams. Granted not the best receivers, except to, but still he never could seal the deal. Plus his attitude.. I hated it .
 
smoker145 said:
Jim- and it all amounts to one big didappointment.

He had great teams. Granted not the best receivers, except to, but still he never could seal the deal. Plus his attitude.. I hated it .
Click to expand...

And Vicks career ended in what? 0 appearances in the SB and 3 playoff appearances?

Yeah, he was a stud.
 
Mcnabb is best remembered for throwing up on the sideline.

Throwing a pick in the. 4 th . Getting it back after a penalty, then doing it again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top