butrybench555
New member
Are your elbows suppose to be tight and close to your body or wide and out
Sent from my iPhone using Am.com
Sent from my iPhone using Am.com
rsnake21 said:If your goal is to build chest then you should flare your elbows out to about 45 degrees
This, also bring the bar to your collarbone.
Rodja said:This is a horrible idea. That would not only make it more of a triceps lift, but it can lead to major AC impingement.
The tuck between a raw PL'er and BB'er isn't that much different, but the flare after the eccentric is what is highly different. BB'ers tend to flare much earlier than a PL'er and it can push more of the emphasis on the chest, but it can also put more stress on the shoulder.
flare your elbows out as far as you can without having shoulder pain. 45 degrees is good. If you really want to build your chest try this next time you bench. I recomend you only use a moderate weight.
Use a tempo of 4(negative) 0 1(positive) 0 and do 8 reps. The tempo and reps are very important.
Now on the negative contraction squeeze your hands together as hard as you can (without actually moving your hands).
You will be amazed at how much your chest contracts. Do the same on the way up if you can. (if it hurts to much just do it on the negative)
With the tempo above the set will last about 40 seconds. Do 4 sets of this with strict 40 second breaks andyour chest will be on fire!
If your goal is to build chest then you should flare your elbows out to about 45 degrees
He was asking what works for size, I was specifically addressing what works for size, I am not suggesting you use heavy weights with flared elbows to your neck.
What I am suggesting is that a wide grip with flared elbows to the collarbone, with moderate weight very slow and controlled emphasizes the chest, at least it has for me.
However for chest size their are much better options than bench, dumbbells for one, and ring push ups, as well as dips.
Peace
This is a horrible idea. That would not only make it more of a triceps lift, but it can lead to major AC impingement.
The tuck between a raw PL'er and BB'er isn't that much different, but the flare after the eccentric is what is highly different. BB'ers tend to flare much earlier than a PL'er and it can push more of the emphasis on the chest, but it can also put more stress on the shoulder.
A tuck is a tuck. If the arms flare its because of the tuck style weakness in the triceps and maintaining form. I know of no one that would deliberately tuck and flare out of the bottom.
To build your chest symmetrically, use dumbbells instead of a barbell.
My goals are getting a big chest. I need more inner and central bulk.
I didn't say anything about flaring at the bottom. Flaring, in this scenario, happens in the concentric.
At the bottom is the start of the concentric movement.
Oh stop dork. You know what I mean.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
What do you base the "should" on? And no I am not being argumentative.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
I base it off of every PL'er I've talked to about the bench press. The elbows should "pop" out near the lockout and move the bar towards the head.
Moreso for the shirted press, but the same principle applies to a raw press.Never heard that and I compete at the world level. Is this a shirted press?
Actually raw and shirted are very different.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Well the same principle you are saying are applies is not true because they are totally different lifts.
I compete. We dont teach what you are saying.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
lonewolf0420 said:Well I think the bases have been covered.
For me , incline BB with elbows at 45 degrees with moderate reps as heavy as possible as stirred positive development for me. Control is key, slower negatives, explosive positives.
Bc your technique is the only one that is valid.
He says flare back not out.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
How exactly do you flare back, but not out?
Its his video that you posted. I think based on the video you posted he is arcing backward. That is just my guess.
And no hard feelings debating. Nice to share some interesting dialogue.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
How Tate teaches is to keep the elbows tucked until near lockout and then to pop the elbows out and flare them, which moves the bar towards the head. If you didn't pop he elbows and flare, then it would essentially be a front raise the last few inches and that would significantly lower poundages.
That is correct. Current westside lifters will promote pressing in a straight line as opposed to the J or C pressing that flaring the elbows creates. One thing I like about their thought process is that for me it really does help to think of the bar as unmovable and you're just pushing your body through the bench by leveraging yourself against the bar. But I of course learned first to flare at the top.I believe metel militia teaches to flare back and westside teaches pressing in a straight line.
That is correct. Current westside lifters will promote pressing in a straight line as opposed to the J or C pressing that flaring the elbows creates. One thing I like about their thought process is that for me it really does help to think of the bar as unmovable and you're just pushing your body through the bench by leveraging yourself against the bar. But I of course learned first to flare at the top.