AClockwrkOrng
New member
I am currently taking Jack3d and I was wondering if adding adding this stack plus Dermatherm Target would be safe. I am trying to target the unwanted fat around my abs and my "love handles"?
I am currently taking Jack3d and I was wondering if adding adding this stack plus Dermatherm Target would be safe. I am trying to target the unwanted fat around my abs and my "love handles"?
Yes, it would be beneficial.
You can reduce fat in those areas since ALPHA-T2 targets A2-receptors, which burn fat in the stomach/love handle region.
Great stack!
Building muscle (myohypertrophy) has very little to do with oxidative capabilities, in general (yes, muscle is directly related to metabolic activity typically of carbohydrates and protein, which is why I said in general). Triglycerides must be broken down from adipose tissue-lipolysis, then enters plasma and is continued to b-oxidation and eventually is converted to acetyl-coa and enters the TCA cycle in active skeletal muscles, not surrounding muscle (for simplicity). To increase lipid metabolism, one would need to increase capillary beds and mitochondria (where lipid oxidation occurs) leading to and within a muscle cell.
russy russ -
what about cortisol blockers, i.e. Lean Xtreme, Reduce XT - that have studied to be shown to reduce VAT and fat directly related to the abdominal area?
im not saying your wrong, but just rather an explanation to the above based on your stated opinion
So what would you suggest would be helpful, on top of my normal cardio and ab workout.
First you have to take into consideration the basis of the study (e.g is it something that can be tested to produce similar results each time), in what way will the test be administered and by whom (qualified scientist?), what are the confounding issues to the test which may skew the results, is there a way to reduce the confounding issues and were they completely eliminated?, was the research study peer reviewed?, are there other similar studies and how many?
There are many studies, you have to decipher which are more valid and credible than others.
A diet that is conducive to fat loss (not necessarily fat oxidation) (e.g no restriction of carbohydrates, less than 30% fats) I'm not going to get into a debate with everyone on why for the millionth time. Take it or leave it (not directed to any particular individual, just in general)