Guest viewing is limited

ANDROGENIC ACTIVITY.

corsaking

Well-known member
Hi

could someone please advise me on this.

If you take 2 AAS , one with androgenic activity of 100
and another which has lower activity eg 73

Are you increasing the androgenic activity to 173 or can it go no higher than 100.

I dont want to increase the risks that are associated with androgens

Thanks
 
corsaking said:
Hi

could someone please advise me on this.

If you take 2 AAS , one with androgenic activity of 100
and another which has lower activity eg 73

Are you increasing the androgenic activity to 173 or can it go no higher than 100.

I dont want to increase the risks that are associated with androgens

Thanks
Click to expand...

It depends on the binding affinity and the degree of receptor occupancy. If the binding affinity of the two compounds is the same and receptor occupancy is low then there will likely be a net increase in androgenic activity (but not additive). If receptor occupancy is near maximal and their binding affinities are the same, then their will likely be lower than lower androgenic activity than the "100" steroid alone. This is a generalization and there are a lot of things going on at once.
 
sethroberts said:
It depends on the binding affinity and the degree of receptor occupancy. If the binding affinity of the two compounds is the same and receptor occupancy is low then there will likely be a net increase in androgenic activity (but not additive). If receptor occupancy is near maximal and their binding affinities are the same, then their will likely be lower than lower androgenic activity than the "100" steroid alone. This is a generalization and there are a lot of things going on at once.
Click to expand...

Thanks
ok ill name names


testosterone with furazadrol by axis labs.
I know its been doctored and isnt exactly the same as the original -trade name-miotolan-and originally methylated.

the androgenic activity of test 100
miotolan -73-94

Now im assuming that furazadrol will be similar. The product description mantions it doesnt convert to E but no mention of DHT

Also test is for mass , fura for cutting . so would they work together or a waste of time.

interested to know what you think

tks
 
corsaking said:
Thanks
ok ill name names


testosterone with furazadrol by axis labs.
I know its been doctored and isnt exactly the same as the original -trade name-miotolan-and originally methylated.

the androgenic activity of test 100
miotolan -73-94

Now im assuming that furazadrol will be similar. The product description mantions it doesnt convert to E but no mention of DHT

Also test is for mass , fura for cutting . so would they work together or a waste of time.

interested to know what you think

tks
Click to expand...

No offense to the people who make it, but i don't have a high opinion of furazadrol. Miotilin was nothing speacial and I don't see the unmethylated version doing much of anything.
 
sethroberts said:
No offense to the people who make it, but i don't have a high opinion of furazadrol. Miotilin was nothing speacial and I don't see the unmethylated version doing much of anything.
Click to expand...

anything worth running otc non methylated that would work with test ?
 
2 weak stuff
 
appreciate all the comments

still dont fully understand the comments made by sethroberts about

"It depends on the binding affinity and the degree of receptor occupancy. If the binding affinity of the two compounds is the same and receptor occupancy is low then there will likely be a net increase in androgenic activity (but not additive). If receptor occupancy is near maximal and their binding affinities are the same, then their will likely be lower than lower androgenic activity than the "100" steroid alone. This is a generalization and there are a lot of things going on at once. "

if you can give examples of combining 2 aas or aas/ds together it might help.

tks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top