Guest viewing is limited

Cyanostane? (2-cyano-17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-androst-3-one)

JBerto

Active member
Some guy post that on BB.com forums.

According to Patrick Arnold it a:a ratios is... 800/45 !!!!!!

:eek:


Anyone knows something about that new hormonal?
 
My log is underway starting today. Update to come tonight:

Invalid Link Removed
 
But read the bb.com at 3rd page: the compound tha PA was talking about, that was 800/45 a/a ratio, is another one: finishing with 2-ene (the a-43 on vida), and the cynostane is 3-one (the a42 on vida), that is something about 60 anabolic and about 20androgenic
 
anbes said:
But read the bb.com at 3rd page: the compound tha PA was talking about, that was 800/45 a/a ratio, is another one: finishing with 2-ene (the a-43 on vida), and the cynostane is 3-one (the a42 on vida), that is something about 60 anabolic and about 20androgenic
Click to expand...

Is it listed in vida? Are you sure it only has 60/20. Thats extremly low, lower than h-drol.
 
anbes said:
But read the bb.com at 3rd page: the compound tha PA was talking about, that was 800/45 a/a ratio, is another one: finishing with 2-ene (the a-43 on vida), and the cynostane is 3-one (the a42 on vida), that is something about 60 anabolic and about 20androgenic
Click to expand...

I think cyanostane isn't A-42 (a42 have a 1-ene, and cyanostane have not 1-ene)
 
DAdams91982 said:
I dont have VIDA here at work. I am sure someone here has it on hand.. the nomenclatures are different, but same compounds.
Click to expand...

The bold doesn't make sense, you mean it is just written different? It is easy to look at nomenclature and compare it and the ones that are listed don't match up from what I can tell.
No one has found it that I have seen just yet and at this point I would figure someone would.
 
Grambo said:
The bold doesn't make sense, you mean it is just written different? It is easy to look at nomenclature and compare it and the ones that are listed don't match up from what I can tell.
No one has found it that I have seen just yet and at this point I would figure someone would.
Click to expand...

Written differently... wrong choice of words.
 
Actually.... I am unsubbing... i didnt want to get caught in all the drama in the first place!

Damn me and my big mouth.
 
GotTest said:
I've looked through VIDA for a couple days and can't find it.
Maybe someone can get the number from PA.
Click to expand...

PA has said in bb.com the nomenclature seem to be incomplete.

Anyway, some guy at bb.com has said he will send to PA some capsules to test it.

Any AI Reps here?


BTW, due to the FDA persecution of all hormonals supps, maybe AI has chosen launch it "silently", and they wan't say that compound is listed on an "evil book that list roids" (Vida's book) to "hide it"
 
JBerto said:
PA has said in bb.com the nomenclature seem to be incomplete.
Click to expand...
I've said that too. I can only assume by the product name (stane) that it's 5a-reduced. If that is the case, it's 2-cyano-17a-methyl-DHT.

If he is implying that the nomenclature is missing a double-bond (-ene), then without testing it, he's probably just guessing...
 
I can understand doing this silently but I`d really like to know more about this compound. I had some extra $$ so I stocked up on M Drol, Havoc, Phera, etc. I have about 20 assorted bottles and I don`t want to buy something new if it`s very similar to something I already have.
 
Thats the problem, the lesser ones are similar in level of effect, no one wants a mediocre compound unless its their first run. The last better than mediocre compound was 19-Norandrosta it was a variant of 19-Norandrodiol (which was even better). So the question is; will this be better than that and SD or will it be just as good as the "not so great" ones?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top