how to compare protodrol to other compounds...
halodrol - mg/mg protodrol is significantly stronger in terms of both size and strength.
protodrol will yield sides on par with halo(slim to none), yet also offer substantial liver safety over halodrol.
epi/havoc - mg/mg protodrol isabout the same strength, or slightly weaker, how
however at 50mg/day, gains should rival 40mg/day of epi(or beat it!)
sides from protodrol will be less pronounced as dry joints will not be an issue for protodrol.
tren(estra4,9/19-nor) - mg/mg far stronger than any tren clone. size gains will
far surpass any tren clone due to its potent anabolic activity(180% of methyl test!)
sides from protodrol will be far less as massive spikes in BP will not be seen like they
are with all tren clones. liver impact will be about on par IMO, however that is pure speculation for now.
pheraplex - mg/mg protodrol is just about on par with phera. 90% as strong at the least. the main diff between these 2 is the quality of gains. protodrol offers 0% chance for bloating which phera is famous for. as a result, bp issues should be less apparent. as u can see in the study posted, proto offers significantly reduced liver impact as the 3-ene(madol) and 2-ene(dmt) variations were shown to signifcant raise bilirubin levels.
the one - mg/mg protodrol is stronger than this compound, and offers a higher a:a ratio. gains in strength and hardening should be similar with protodrol offering more in the mass dept. as with all the other methyls listed, significantly less liver impact.
bold200 - mg/mg protodrol is worlds stronger than bold200 due to the
alkylation on the 17a carbon position. protodrol will induce strength and weight
gains far quicker than bold200, and less pills/day are required. hunger will not
increase on protodrol as it does with bold200. liver impact will be on par in terms
of bilirubin levels(i believe. do not quote me as i have not researched equi's
effect on bilirubin. BP issues will be of less concern than with bold200, as elevated
BP was not seen past normal limits with all testers, while bold200 can bring
massive BP spikes.
SOME GUY ASKED WHAT PROTODROL WAS LIKE COMPARED TO REAL AAS LIKE VAR AND THE REP REPLIED WITH
comparison to an illegal aas is tricky, however here is my best attempt.
var will induce slight weight gain, but offers great hardening...with a MASSIVE
price tag. protodrol will give bigger size gains, and offer compareable hardness
with a price tag of about 10% of var
Apprentley all users on this compound gained at least 8 pounds at most 14 pounds.
Well i got this all from body building.com the comparisons to other compounds is made by an iforce rep called VaughnTrue
1 thing i did notice was AN reps arguing with i force nutrition reps about THE ONE being stronger than protodrol and vice versa.
Also patrick arnold has also said in the thread that he supports THE ONE and ap and that he has not heard of anything like protodrol before and he things we should all stay clear from it....
That is my point. IForce is not at fault for their belief that Protodrol is stronger than The One. IForce is not at fault for making a comparison between the two when it was asked. Hell, there is technically nothing wrong with commenting about AN coming into the thread with their comments (The mismatch of rules regarding this instance make the situation so confusing I feel a mod would have trouble taking action with enforcing one of the rules while disregarding another...)
The biggest thing I see is IForce believes their product is stronger, so when an AN rep disagreed it was an open opportunity to make their case with their studies, their science, etc. Even the "You used a similar compound but did not use this compound so your experience isn't necessarily applicable here." approach would have worked as opposed to just negatively responded to the AN rep without any rebuttal to the things he said...
Just seemed odd. Also seemed odd that you told me to drop it and you were seemingly against me even after I openly stated I would use Protodrol well before The One...
LOL- we are going to have to agree to disagree on this compound being stronger than The One- Don, my other business partner, and I have both used 5-ene-17a-methyl 5a-androst-17b-ol- very similar compound-this too is desoxy (w/o oxygen- ketone structure removed @ C3) DHT, but with a double bond @ C5- we were "comparison shopping" for new compounds from some different suppliers). I can't say that the 5-ene version would be EXACTLY the same as 17a-methyl 5a-androst-17b-ol- in terms of effects- like everyone says, a little alteration can make a huge difference. The 5-ene version was very weak- really did very little in terms of gains, etc., and had to be taken with oil, and the mg amount needed was fairly high for an effective dose.
Once again, not saying they will be exactly the same- but having used The One and something very similar to 17a-methyl 5a-androst-17b-ol- I can honestly say that on both an mg for mg basis, and effects standpoint, The One is more potent.........
__________________
Invalid Link Removed
ANYWAY i dont mean to dig at applied nutrition i like THE ONE and i look forward to using THE ONE and PROTODROL.
apparentley protodrol is effective at 50mgs but alot of people are saying you will see better effects than var if you dose at 100mgs which is safe and higher for bigger more expirenced users.
I look forward to protodrol and i think it might come with Reversitol for pct if not reversitol seems sufficient for pct from what i have read.
I post this for other people who are intrested in protodrol. Apprentley it should be released soon,
