^
thats true up to a point but isn't mdrol an oral with a modestly short half life? I suppose we could calculate the exact duration to run the anti-e if we knew the cycle history and mdrol,mdrol' t1/2(s).
Exactly how 6-oxo works biochemically, i'm not yet convinced of any particular theory. To make things simple its a steroidal compound sharing many attributes with testosterone yet it is a unique drug --i mean supplement-- molecule. All the rhetoric about it being an AI, where is that study, how does it conform to that label? No doubt mechanisms are euphamistically stated or even twisted to distinguish them from an already conditionally illicit substance. This happens all the time, in many arenas. Drugs that are terrific fits for some people become generally demonized because they are deemed to belong to some category in which it is in vogue to crack down on all members. Regulation is not envoked to afford higher quality but because either lots of money has convinced the feds that it is a civil liberty when it comes to personal estrogen manipulation but testosterone is forever evil, or the mothers who aren't getting any **** special interest group is at it again.
oh back on topic,
6-oxo does increase testosterone and estrogen to a small extent. The T/E differential is greater at the 600 mg so it makes since to ramp the two covariantly to some degree, yet that is splitting hairs, or rather capsules. Your PCT seems right on target. You might not need to run it for that long.