M-Drol or P-Plex

[Silver3CSRT8]

I have taken M-Drol in the past and was pretty happy with the results. However, I am intrigued by P-Plex and the gains people have had with P-Plex seem pretty good. Looking at the web site both products (P-Plex and M-Drol) state lean muscle and strength, but no real detailed differences in what to expect between the compounds.

I am also considering the P-Plex to M-Drol bridge. I am fully aware of off supporting supplements, PCT, SERMS, etc.

I just finished a cycle of Epistane and was pretty happy with the results, but I preferred the gains from M-Drol with the shorter cycle (3 weeks vs. 6 weeks). Should I stick with M-Drol or would P-Plex be a good compound to evaluate.

 

[partyman43]

I have taken M-Drol in the past and was pretty happy with the results. However, I am intrigued by P-Plex and the gains people have had with P-Plex seem pretty good. Looking at the web site both products (P-Plex and M-Drol) state lean muscle and strength, but no real detailed differences in what to expect between the compounds.

I am also considering the P-Plex to M-Drol bridge. I am fully aware of off supporting supplements, PCT, SERMS, etc.

I just finished a cycle of Epistane and was pretty happy with the results, but I preferred the gains from M-Drol with the shorter cycle (3 weeks vs. 6 weeks). Should I stick with M-Drol or would P-Plex be a good compound to evaluate.

Good question bro....I struggled with the same question briefly but ultimatley decided on P-PLEX. Supposedly not quite as harsh as M-drol. I have also seen that people have gotten pretty good results with P-PLEX(Pheraflex).

I will not start my cycle till November(hopefully)....I can't wait...but I got to:toofunny:

 

[mw1]

Well Pplex is also a strong compound w/ a little less sides than Mdrol. If you are unsure what you what , you could "plan" on doing a bridge of PP and Mdrol . When it is time to bridge the two evaluate you cycle and see if you are where you want to be. If you are happy , continue w.PP for 2 more weeks , but if you are looking for a little more then bridge the Mdrol. Either way i would seriosly consider using Cycle Assist the whole way thru.

 

[partyman43]

I have taken M-Drol in the past and was pretty happy with the results. However, I am intrigued by P-Plex and the gains people have had with P-Plex seem pretty good. Looking at the web site both products (P-Plex and M-Drol) state lean muscle and strength, but no real detailed differences in what to expect between the compounds.

I am also considering the P-Plex to M-Drol bridge. I am fully aware of off supporting supplements, PCT, SERMS, etc.

I just finished a cycle of Epistane and was pretty happy with the results, but I preferred the gains from M-Drol with the shorter cycle (3 weeks vs. 6 weeks). Should I stick with M-Drol or would P-Plex be a good compound to evaluate.

If you get the chance...check out the poll thread(if you haven't already) by Grunt76 titled"designer steroids: lets rate them". Phera is second to M-drol:clap2:

Good Luck

 

[Silver3CSRT8]

Well Pplex is also a strong compound w/ a little less sides than Mdrol. If you are unsure what you what , you could "plan" on doing a bridge of PP and Mdrol . When it is time to bridge the two evaluate you cycle and see if you are where you want to be. If you are happy , continue w.PP for 2 more weeks , but if you are looking for a little more then bridge the Mdrol. Either way i would seriosly consider using Cycle Assist the whole way thru.

Thx for the info. What is the big key difference between the 2 compounds. Feel free to tell me to search if you desire. I personally loved the gains (disliked the sides) of M-Drol. I can deal with the sides for 3 weeks for the solid gains if M-Drol is that much better than Phera.

I started out taking Cycle Support, but since I did a 6 week cycle I purchsed CEL's Cycle Assist midway through. I don't think I will go back and I know CEL makes top notch products. Any plans for a CEL version of Post Cycle Support?

 

[GMG760]

Thx for the info. What is the big key difference between the 2 compounds. Feel free to tell me to search if you desire. I personally loved the gains (disliked the sides) of M-Drol. I can deal with the sides for 3 weeks for the solid gains if M-Drol is that much better than Phera.

I started out taking Cycle Support, but since I did a 6 week cycle I purchsed CEL's Cycle Assist midway through. I don't think I will go back and I know CEL makes top notch products. Any plans for a CEL version of Post Cycle Support?

CEL does make quite top notch products. I can't wait to use their cycle assist with my Mdrol run.

Mdrol is a dry compound, and Pplex is a wet compound. Those are your biggest two differences. You might keep a few more pounds from the mdrol because of this difference, as some of the Pplex gains will be water weight unless your diet is immaculate. I am planning on running Mdrol next, but Pplex will probably be what I am going to run after that.

From what I have read over and over, Mdrol (superdrol) is the king of designer compounds as far as bang for your buck, so long as you can handle the side effects. Phera is also supposed to be really good, but can have some androgenic side effects like hair loss and such. After running Epi and not losing a single hair, I am not too worried. But it is definitely something to consider.