We can't really tell PERIOD. We don't know what is in ANY PH. That's why you should stick to the real deal. PA tested Methox-TRN and said there was something else(don't recall what exactly) in it than what the label claimed. Kilosports Trenadrol claims to be the exact same compound as M-TRN yet logs show TOTALLY different results, sides, etc. DS has a high rep for a reason and were the ones who OWNED the Superdrol compound because they were the first to ever release it. That IS the real deal. All we can say for sure is that since these clones have came out, the delayed gyno has become a big problem for many users. Such an issue never arose prior to the clones being available. I have heard from another source in the past that select clones were actually tainted with anadrol. It would make total sense for them to synthesize SD from anadrol as their chemical structure is VERY similar. I'm sure mullet can chime in here...
In terms of legitimate methylmasteron sources, parties at both Anabolic Xtreme and DS had confirmed in the past the raw source for each was one in the same; Anabolic Xtreme SuperDrol and Designer Supplements SuperDrol were the same compound, synthesized by the same source. Take that for what it is worth.
Chemistry is admittedly not my forte, but I believe it is easier to super saturate the Hydrogen from the 2nd carbon position on Anadrol to synthesize SD, than it is to add a methyl group at the 17th position to Masteron. A 'dirty' conversion in the former respect would produce instant watery gains, androgenic side effects, gynecomastia, and so on; in all respects, Masteron itself is a very mild, extremely anabolic compound which users report little to nothing in the way of common androgenic side effects. Technically, SD should perform much more akin to the latter than the former, but with many clones this does not seem to be the case.
Interestingly enough, the
most reputable company currently producing designers - CEL - has come under fire for the relative 'weakness' of their M-DROL clone. I find this hilarious, as it has been confirmed their source material is one-in-the-same with the AX source material. It would seem individuals became accustomed to the effects, and reports made thereof, of these poorly synthesized clones, and did not recognize the effects of a subtle compound.
Anybody who is interested in this issue, search the archives for the original tester logs. Off the top of my head, B5150 and LeanOne both tested the compound. They reported very clean and maintainable gains, with very low occurrences of BP and lipid issues.