Chlorodrol-50 vs. turinabol

agent8

agent8

Banned
How would 50mg 4-chloro-andro-4,1-diene-3,17b-diol-17a-methyl compare to 4-chloro-andro-4,1-diene-3-one-17b-ol-17a-methyl compare mg to mg? Laymens terms chlorodrol-50 to 50mg turinabol.
 
very similar bro!!!!
 
Yes, very similar but chlorodrol-50 is $55/1.5gr and turinabol is $6/gr from you know who.:bow28:
 
The G Train said:
probably converts to 40-45mg OT
Click to expand...
LMFAO...where in the he11 did you pull that number from? i can say with virtually complete certainty that it doesnt convert that much, based on the fact that no other prohormone converts above, oh about 15%, and you're suggesting 90%.
 
Jayzen said:
Chlorodrol-50 is already active and not a ph of turinabol, just similar
Click to expand...
well, it's a -diol, so it converts to something. i dont dispute that it may have other chemical interactions, but i dont think anyone knows what they actually are...

isnt halodrol in Vida, with a lower A/A ratio? tbol's is like 94/5 or something super high like that. this might be a clue...
 
Ryan17 said:
stuff is almost double the cost of h-drol same compound correct?
Click to expand...

Yes its the same, although their(Culver Concepts) nomenclature suggests that it is a Promagnon-25 clone. I e-mailed them to make sure and they assured me it was a Halodrol clone. I'm a big fan of Promagnon-25, that's why I am up to speed on what is and what isn't a clone.
 
Hardcore Formulations H-Roid 4-Chloro-17a-Methyl-Andro-4-Ene-3,17b-Diol is an actual Promagnon-25 clone correct?
 
In patrick arnold's OTC steroid review featured in muscle development, he says that it does in fact convert into OT.
 
Yeah these 2 compounds are different (Halo & OT) but so many think Halo is simply a PH of OT & that's it. I was lead to believe this at 1st too but Halo is a bit more androgenic & little less anabolic. The Q ratios (anabolic:androgenic) for OT is 8.83 so it's 8.83 times more anabolic than androgenic. Halo's ratio is 2.6 so it's 2.6 times as anabolic as it is andro. Wiki lists OT having anabolic# of 53 and andro# of 6 but this is on a scale from 1 to 100. I'd imagine for comparison purposes only that the Vida Q ratios (A:A) for Halo would be abouts 78:30 and OT would be more like 111:13 as I said before of Halo being less anabolic but having a little more androgenic. The vida #'s should be used for comparison reasons only as they're just a reference. Some compounds bind 'more strongly to' receptors - therefore some compounds with lower A:A #'s could actually be stronger than a higher # compound if they bind more strongly. As the case with Masteron. It has a low androgenic# but it's a somewhat potent androgen as it binds to the andro receptors much more strongly than many anabolics.
 
Ziquor said:
Yeah these 2 compounds are different (Halo & OT) but so many think Halo is simply a PH of OT & that's it. I was lead to believe this at 1st too but Halo is a bit more androgenic & little less anabolic. The Q ratios (anabolic:androgenic) for OT is 8.83 so it's 8.83 times more anabolic than androgenic. Halo's ratio is 2.6 so it's 2.6 times as anabolic as it is andro. Wiki lists OT having anabolic# of 53 and andro# of 6 but this is on a scale from 1 to 100. I'd imagine for comparison purposes only that the Vida Q ratios (A:A) for Halo would be abouts 78:30 and OT would be more like 111:13 as I said before of Halo being less anabolic but having a little more androgenic. The vida #'s should be used for comparison reasons only as they're just a reference. Some compounds bind 'more strongly to' receptors - therefore some compounds with lower A:A #'s could actually be stronger than a higher # compound if they bind more strongly. As the case with Masteron. It has a low androgenic# but it's a somewhat potent androgen as it binds to the andro receptors much more strongly than many anabolics.
Click to expand...
I did hear that halodrol is more androgenic, and less anabolic than OT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top