Your not making any sense (still). If I do a write up or go into detail why every ingredient was used in DTH "scientifically" thats not going to change the end result of using the product. What its only going to do is tell my comp. what to use and why. I dont need "science" to back up DTH, its not something thats in the "design" phase, its out on the market producing results for EVERYONE who uses it. Posting the "science" behind it will serve no beneficial purpose for me. I mean if I lose that 1% of consumers who only purchase products with "scientific" write ups, then thats fine with me.
What you should do is not bash products you havent used or read any reviews on because its ignorant. I never once said Actx wont or shouldnt increase test levels or it was garbage, or questioned why rhodiola was in it since rhodiola doesnt increase testosterone. The product is put together to produce a certain end result. Ok. Scientific write up on it or not, its still the same product.
Your making some dumb a*s comments.
_________
Anway:
Invalid Link Removed
I agree. The only way to settle this is to take pre/post bloodwork and compare the difference between baseline test. and post product test. This means that THE SAME PERSON needs to do pre/post, meaning getting blood drawn 4 times. (twice for each product). There's no point in comparing 2 different people as there is too much genetic variation.
Anything else is all arbitrary and 'Dude, I got jacked'. (i.e. irrelevant and worthless).
I'd like to see this discussion move on from 'discussing' and onto blood testing. I think the topic has been beaten to death and now it is time to start comparing numbers. The arguing back and forth is getting nowhere at this point.
I'd like to see this discussion move on from 'discussing' and onto blood testing. I think the topic has been beaten to death and now it is time to start comparing numbers. The arguing back and forth is getting nowhere at this point.
I'd like to see this discussion move on from 'discussing' and onto blood testing. I think the topic has been beaten to death and now it is time to start comparing numbers. The arguing back and forth is getting nowhere at this point.
Since my product has a write up that explains the exact reason why each compound is used in the formua (which is then backed by science) people will know that Rhodiola is not in the formula to boost test.
Instead of having people take my product to have it compared to yours, you should have people run bloodwork and post the results of those test (which I have already done). That will show how effective your product is at boosting test. Then you can sell it based on its own results instead of trying to say its better then someone elses.
ACTX is the best because the science, feedback, results and actual bloodwork (of it being used standalone and the current formula) show it to be. Not just because I say so.
forget about it , chuck will never accept that...
its proven that placebo works too...
get real
That maybe true... I just gained 10 lbs and a sh** load of strength in a month in a half using in addition to a whole lot of BCAA, food some AX and Size On. I've NEVER been this heavy or strong while just on creatine and eating till I couldn't eat no more!!!!
Would you say this is placebo???
Your not making any sense (still). If I do a write up or go into detail why every ingredient was used in DTH "scientifically" thats not going to change the end result of using the product. What its only going to do is tell my comp. what to use and why. I dont need "science" to back up DTH, its not something thats in the "design" phase, its out on the market producing results for EVERYONE who uses it. Posting the "science" behind it will serve no beneficial purpose for me. I mean if I lose that 1% of consumers who only purchase products with "scientific" write ups, then thats fine with me.
What you should do is not bash products you havent used or read any reviews on because its ignorant. I never once said Actx wont or shouldnt increase test levels or it was garbage, or questioned why rhodiola was in it since rhodiola doesnt increase testosterone. The product is put together to produce a certain end result. Ok. Scientific write up on it or not, its still the same product.
Chuck Deisel said:Your making some dumb a*s comments.
Yeah... I thought it was a worthwile first post.
Adams
First learn how to spell. Second I don't care what you think. When all is said and done, the bottom line is results... safe results that is what I as a consumer is most concerned with.
I've seen products that have all kinds of "write-ups" and "scientific" reasons to why their stuff works... most of the gibberish in the data doesn't mean a thing to your average joe-blo. Sometimes I think you need a damn masters degree just
to decipher some of the statements that are made in those write-ups.
WHILE it looked good on paper, the sh** didn't do a damn thing for results!!!! (methoxy) If placebo is so proven, why doesn't it work for all the bunk sh** that don't do a damn thing??
An honest question mind you... Going by that logic, EVERY supplement ever produced would have "worked" because of the placebo effect...
Paying an exhorbiant amount for a product is going to make that person try to get all he can out of that product. So while he is kicking it up a notch, he is thinking, "Man, I added 2.5 pounds on my deadlift, this stuff must be what the Gods were taking."
Adams
I asked for result driven comps and lab work. I made the rhodiola comment because you keep posting that Maca doesnt increase testosterone. If you read the diesel test hardcore write up you will see I never said it does.
I dont sell DTH by saying its better than actx. Im doing this because DS reps are always posting actx is the best herbal test booster out, then pasting like 10-20 links to logs every single time someone ask whats a good test booster.
Link me to some standalone blood work on actx where someone wasnt in post cycle therapy that shows any sig. increase in total test and free test......I just want to see it for my own personal reasons.
Lastly, I notice you jump into other companies forums (SSE) and pretty much ask them for the science in their new formula, yet you will not discuss your own. :think:
Adams
What, are you the grammar police? The rest of the post is just drivel. I SAID EARLIER. If you want to shell out a ton of money for something you think is working, that is no skin off my back.
Paying an exhorbiant amount for a product is going to make that person try to get all he can out of that product. So while he is kicking it up a notch, he is thinking, "Man, I added 2.5 pounds on my deadlift, this stuff must be what the Gods were taking."
Adams
No I'm not the grammar police!! It seems to me that you are quick to respond to comments before thinking them through.
You know a person(s) usually dismisses comments or statements as nonsense or childish when they can't provide an intelligent response to those comments or statements. Criticizing is another
culprit to a persons lack of knowledge on a question or comments.
So tell me man if placebo is proven WHY doesn't it work for all the bunk supplements that has come and gone over the years??? And btw for the record, I like the AX.. I HOPE that the AX had SOMETHING to do with the gains I've made over the last two months and that it wasn't just me THINKING it did because it has great science behind it that proves that it works...
man, this is getting very:
8=====D~~~~(_(_
Blood tests for side by side comparison of products. That's the solution to the problem.
I agree! So Chuck time to back up all those claims that your product works. And DS time to provide some RESULTS to back-up all that science your company claims worked for me!!!
Im lost what do you want from DS?
23 free bottles of Activate eXtreme!!!
Adams
Im lost what do you want from DS?
I agree with ReaperX. As an intelligent consumer, i'd like for both companies to provide some proof as to why I should buy their stuff... no biases no BS. I still have a half a bottle of AX in my cabinet and just taken my morning dose not to long ago...
I work hard for my cash and would like to know that the stuff i'm paying for is doing what it says!!!
Are you unlost now???
And no I don't want anything free from nobody!!! Both companies should provide unbiased testing of their product. I would think or HOPE that the companies in question have honesty and integrity
and provide sound PROOF that their product is the real deal.
I agree with ReaperX. As an intelligent consumer, i'd like for both companies to provide some proof as to why I should buy their stuff... no biases no BS. I still have a half a bottle of AX in my cabinet and just taken my morning dose not to long ago...
I work hard for my cash and would like to know that the stuff i'm paying for is doing what it says!!!
Are you unlost now???
And no I don't want anything free from nobody!!! Both companies should provide unbiased testing of their product. I would think or HOPE that the companies in question have honesty and integrity
and provide sound PROOF that their product is the real deal.
man , no offense but you`re changing your statements since your first post, and you show no knowledge enough to make statements like you did( creatine and bcaa -no scientific studies, hilarious) , first do some research on the subjects you`re discussing cause you`re making a fool of yourself...
I never said there was no scientific data behind those products!!! In fact there is TONS of "scientific data" behind those. So what are you talking about?? You obviously have poor comprehension skills bud. All I did was list what I was taking in conjunction with AX.....
you said I call that placebo, man English is not my mother language but the one that no one understand here its ...YOU
Post #219 in this thread is a good start for some proof.![]()
Again learn how to comprehend what is being said homie... I NEVER claimed you called THOSE supplements placebo man.. wtf??? In my first post I said I'm interested in what works.. not mentioning any supplement what so ever and then you come in and say that placebo is proven to work also.... I KNOW that Creatine and BCAA works (no question about it) because not only did I make great gains while taking them but buddies of mine who NEVER taken creatine made HUGE gains while taking nothing but that. On top of the creatine and BCAA, I've made even MORE gains while on AX and I asked was that placebo also according to you....
Time for you to take some English comprehension classes on top of your language classes buddy!!!
Unbiased I hope??? is that you in your avatar??
you show no knowledge enough to make statements like you did( creatine and bcaa -no scientific studies, hilarious) , first do some research on the subjects you`re discussing cause you`re making a fool of yourself...
Unbiased I hope??? is that you in your avatar??
They were labs done before and after a activate cycle. Posted by the user themselves. Had camera phone pictures of them, so you can deduce that they werent generated by BS. Pretty much about as third party as they get.
Adams
I think the problem just stems from the point you entered the conversation. We have been having a debate about if science matters with todays supplements. Mostly because we asked Chuck about his DTH formula, since he doesnt have any scientific data on his product. When you posted your initial post, it seemed to use to say "I dont care what science has to say about a product." After that, it just spun out of control. It seems that you do care what the science behind a product says, so really it makes all this back and forth moot.
Adams
Hey chuck, i'll have some blood work done in just another couple weeks, but it would only include testosterone, E2, LH + FSH. i'd be interested in logging DTH after that and repeating the same tests at the end of timespan.
Lastly, I notice you jump into other companies forums (SSE) and pretty much ask them for the science in their new formula, yet you will not discuss your own. :think:
Adams
Sixpack BB.com:
Day 23- Chest/Core
Well today I had not DOMS at all really at all after Leg day which is very odd but its also nice in a way. I will say in the past 3 days libido has been up a great deal and I will declare this the 'BEST' libido enhancer or whatever you want to call it i have taken . I am not going to get technical cause I am not a technical person or know the scientific stuff about it. I will let the DS crew handle the reason why this is so much better then Ejaculoid, DT, Tribulus etc, I have also take 6oxo and this is far better then any of the above. Not only cause libido but how I feel, sleep patters, recovery .
I'm not going to go into depth to justify my knowledge to post here for you.