Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

pGH (specifically the GABOB) and cortisol?!

pudzian2

Banned
GABOB has been shown to elevate not only HGH, but prolactin and cortisol....this cant be beneficial..Others studies conclude that it 'improves' amounts of HGH, prolactin, and cortisol...whatever that means.

GABOB is one of the ingredients in pGH
 
Some people say that gh gives them prolactin related-sides. I would use 7-Keto DHEA and perhaps melatonan at night. That should control the cortisol.

Then perhaps add vit B-6 to address prolactin.

bb
 
pudzian2 said:
GABOB has been shown to elevate not only HGH, but prolactin and cortisol....this cant be beneficial..Others studies conclude that it 'improves' amounts of HGH, prolactin, and cortisol...whatever that means.

GABOB is one of the ingredients in pGH
Click to expand...
virtually every GH-related product will cause this, including GH. check the pubmed studies. you can use high-dose B6 to help with prolactin, but the cortisol bump will be harder to manage. i honestly doubt any OTC supplement will be able to abate it - the two pathways seem linked (GH and cortisol) although i'm not clear on the specifics.

i retain lots of water on GH, and many others do too...pretty much a sure sign of cortisol/corticosteroid action, in the absence of other water-related factors (salt increase, estrogen, etc)...
 
good ideas. I use p-5-p as a safer alternative to high doses of B6, and I usually use Relora for cortisol control and (retain 2 in pct).
 
I am a fan of DHEA and I believe there is probably additional benefits to 7-Keto beyond cortisol control. But I think whatever potential problems you might have are easily controllable.

Keep us posted.

bb
 
babyblu said:
I am a fan of DHEA and I believe there is probably additional benefits to 7-Keto beyond cortisol control. But I think whatever potential problems you might have are easily controllable.

Keep us posted.

bb
Click to expand...

I know that retain-2 should not be run indefinitely, HOWEVER i believe that a combination of Relora, 7-keto DHEA/ DHEA and lots of Vit.c CAN be run all year. I would resort to something like Retain 2 for after suppressive cycle when cortisol would likely skyrocket.

could 7-keto be used with DHEA? or should one or the other be used
 
Eric from primordial performance seems to think that phosphatylserine is the best cortisol support you can get
 
check out the debate on supplement section regarding 11beta hydoxysteroid dehydrogenase

i think the water bloat is from messing with that enzyme either 11bHSD1 or 11bHSD2 in kidneys, kinda like how if you take lots of licorice you get water retention because mineralcorticoids get over abundant

Invalid Link Removed

"Aldosterone and cortisol have similar affinity for the mineralocorticoid receptor however, glucocorticoids circulate at roughly 100 times the level of mineralocorticoids. An enzyme exists in mineralocorticoid target tissues to prevent overstimulation by glucocorticoids. This enzyme, 11-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II (Protein:HSD11B2), catalyzes the deactivation of glucocorticoids to 11-dehydro metabolites. Licorice is known to be an inhibitor of this enzyme and chronic consumption can result in a condition known as pseudohyperaldosteronism." from that link

GH reduces cortisol through inhibiting 11bHSD1 Invalid Link Removed

another
Invalid Link Removed

i actually dont hear alot of people suffereing from prolactin sides and water retention and fat from GH use, ive always heard about fat loss and all the good stuff

so what solarus is saying is news to me. that kinda sucks, i was looking for sides free alternatives to androgens.

however i haven't searched pubmed for GH and prolactin yet, nor have i seen any studies where they looked at GH and 11bHSD2 in other organs (kidneys).




oh man not this enzyme discussion again.....
 
comacho said:
i actually dont hear alot of people suffereing from prolactin sides and water retention and fat from GH use, ive always heard about fat loss and all the good stuff

so what solarus is saying is news to me. that kinda sucks, i was looking for sides free alternatives to androgens.

however i haven't searched pubmed for GH and prolactin yet, nor have i seen any studies where they looked at GH and 11bHSD2 in other organs (kidneys)......
Click to expand...
water retention on GH is actually really common. check on more "conventional" boards, you'll see it reported very often.
 
Solarus, i checked out outlaw, intersting stuff, so it has to be mineralcorticoids related sides since there is no other hormones involved (test to estro etc)

pudzian, you are on pGH currently aren't you? how do you like it so far? any sides? any gains?
 
comacho said:
so what solarus is saying is news to me. that kinda sucks, i was looking for sides free alternatives to androgens.
Click to expand...
for what it's worth, i think IGF-LR3 is just that. it aint anadrol, but it's got virtually nil drawbacks, if you can afford it. i sure wish there was a precursor/potentiator to IGF like there are so many to GH (arginine, gaba, ghb, baclofen, clonidine, etc etc)...
 
SOLARUS said:
for what it's worth, i think IGF-LR3 is just that. it aint anadrol, but it's got virtually nil drawbacks, if you can afford it. i sure wish there was a precursor/potentiator to IGF like there are so many to GH (arginine, gaba, ghb, baclofen, clonidine, etc etc)...
Click to expand...

GH is a precursor to IGF-1 in the sense that increased GH usually leads to increased IGF-1

and no I am not currently on pGH. I start once I fine tune my diet. So 1 or 2 weeks. I have used it before, and DID notice water retention. however, upon cessation the water came off and I was DEFINITELY leaner.
 
pudzian2 said:
GH is a precursor to IGF-1 in the sense that increased GH usually leads to increased IGF-1
Click to expand...
i know. perhaps you missed my point.

GH increases (whether exogenous or otherwise) tend to bring with them undesirable ancillary effects....forearm pain, uneasy sleep (not everyone), water retention...aside from the muscular effects that are likely mediated by IGF-1...what i was getting at was it would be nice to be able to isolate the IGF-1 effects, without the other stuff.
 
SOLARUS said:
i know. perhaps you missed my point.

GH increases (whether exogenous or otherwise) tend to bring with them undesirable ancillary effects....forearm pain, uneasy sleep (not everyone), water retention...aside from the muscular effects that are likely mediated by IGF-1...what i was getting at was it would be nice to be able to isolate the IGF-1 effects, without the other stuff.
Click to expand...

yea, but in the long run GH seems to work better than just IGF-1. (even if just looking at it from a muslce-gain standpoint) From what I have seen, read etc
 
pudzian2 said:
yea, but in the long run GH seems to work better than just IGF-1. (even if just looking at it from a muslce-gain standpoint) From what I have seen, read etc
Click to expand...

Agreed 100%. You can run a mg of igf a week and you wont see your skin smoothen & soften as the wrinkles run away and you look 5-10yrs younger. I have heard of guys having their gray hair darken on gh. GH also supports natural test production. Improves bone density. Fat loss. Etc. Does a lot that igf doesnt do.

bb
 
babyblu said:
Agreed 100%. You can run a mg of igf a week and you wont see your skin smoothen & soften as the wrinkles run away and you look 5-10yrs younger. I have heard of guys having their gray hair darken on gh. GH also supports natural test production. Improves bone density. Fat loss. Etc. Does a lot that igf doesnt do.

bb
Click to expand...

which is a great reason to keep it highly elevated with the use of secretagogues * (spelling)....unless one can afford synthetic GH $$$$
 
Actually GABOB's action on cortisol should be beneficial since too low cortisol (as induced by high GH levels) can lead to tendonitis and such. Really low cortisol should be considered only in contest preparation.
 
Grunt76 said:
Actually GABOB's action on cortisol should be beneficial since too low cortisol (as induced by high GH levels) can lead to tendonitis and such. Really low cortisol should be considered only in contest preparation.
Click to expand...

good point.

Speaking to cortisol...I would like to hear more about phosphotydylserine....maybe we could get primordial over here to comment
 
babyblu said:
Agreed 100%. You can run a mg of igf a week and you wont see your skin smoothen & soften as the wrinkles run away and you look 5-10yrs younger. I have heard of guys having their gray hair darken on gh. GH also supports natural test production. Improves bone density. Fat loss. Etc. Does a lot that igf doesnt do.

bb
Click to expand...
no offense, but if i want an opinion about automotive engineering, i dont ask a car salesman.

i respect your viewpoint, bb, but i take all of your comments with a grain of salt, given your professional position.

not that many guys dont love GH...they do...but it's far from perfect. i can't do it long-term because i like to be lean and hard whenever humanly possible...plus i retain gobs of water on GH and my forearms just ache 24/7. obviously it's working, but i cant handle the sides.
 
Solarus,

For one, I dont know what you mean by my 'professional position'? I'm a law school student. I am a rep for a supplement company (that is not a sponsor here so I will leave the name out). However I certainly dont sell HGH and if you are implying that then you need to check your sources of information.

But whatever you might think of me, I stand by my statement on hgh. Yes I understand there is water retention (which quickly goes away when a person comes off). HGH made my hands constantly numb. I'm a big boy I can handle the sides. I never said hgh is perfect. All I'm saying is that the plethora of benefits that HGH offers far outweighs igf-1, lr3 or any other singular peptide.

Certainly I believe if someone ran a combination of igf-1 lr3, pegMGF, hexarelin, ghrp6, & 176 gh frag at high dosages for at least 4-5 months they would obtain a similar range of benefits (vascularity, fat loss, skin improvements, etc). However I am simply stating that in a 1 on 1 comparison, hgh beats out any other peptide.
bb
 
SOLARUS said:
no offense, but if i want an opinion about automotive engineering, i dont ask a car salesman.

i respect your viewpoint, bb, but i take all of your comments with a grain of salt, given your professional position.

not that many guys dont love GH...they do...but it's far from perfect. i can't do it long-term because i like to be lean and hard whenever humanly possible...plus i retain gobs of water on GH and my forearms just ache 24/7. obviously it's working, but i cant handle the sides.
Click to expand...

Also I dont understand why you are making this personal? I dont even know you. I was simply taking part in the hijacking of this thread (since I was discussing hgh and the original topic was pGH). Further I have lots of personal experience with peptides. Just because I haven't been on this board for years doesnt mean I havent been around the block. So can we leave the personal attacks out?

bb
 
babyblu said:
Solarus,

For one, I dont know what you mean by my 'professional position'? I'm a law school student. I am a rep for a supplement company (that is not a sponsor here so I will leave the name out). However I certainly dont sell HGH and if you are implying that then you need to check your sources of information.

But whatever you might think of me, I stand by my statement on hgh. Yes I understand there is water retention (which quickly goes away when a person comes off). HGH made my hands constantly numb. I'm a big boy I can handle the sides. I never said hgh is perfect. All I'm saying is that the plethora of benefits that HGH offers far outweighs igf-1, lr3 or any other singular peptide.

Certainly I believe if someone ran a combination of igf-1 lr3, pegMGF, hexarelin, ghrp6, & 176 gh frag at high dosages for at least 4-5 months they would obtain a similar range of benefits (vascularity, fat loss, skin improvements, etc). However I am simply stating that in a 1 on 1 comparison, hgh beats out any other peptide.
bb
Click to expand...



and if one were to run such a combination....they might as well fork out for HGH....I mean 1 compound vs a bunch of newer compounds is safer anyway...who really knows wtf else those single peptides can do in combination or in the long run.
 
pudzian2 said:
and if one were to run such a combination....they might as well fork out for HGH....I mean 1 compound vs a bunch of newer compounds is safer anyway...who really knows wtf else those single peptides can do in combination or in the long run.
Click to expand...

I agree. I do like the newer peptides and hope to see more peptides brought to market that will be more efficient, with less side effects, etc. However you have to remember is that the side effects and long-term effects of HGH are well-documented because tons of research studies have been conducted on it. Not so much with a lot of other peptides.

bb
 
babyblu said:
I agree. I do like the newer peptides and hope to see more peptides brought to market that will be more efficient, with less side effects, etc. However you have to remember is that the side effects and long-term effects of HGH are well-documented because tons of research studies have been conducted on it. Not so much with a lot of other peptides.

bb
Click to expand...

yea thats exactly right. especially considering how framiliar the body is with HGH
 
babyblu said:
Also I dont understand why you are making this personal? I dont even know you. I was simply taking part in the hijacking of this thread (since I was discussing hgh and the original topic was pGH). Further I have lots of personal experience with peptides. Just because I haven't been on this board for years doesnt mean I havent been around the block. So can we leave the personal attacks out?

bb
Click to expand...
it isnt personal at all.

it's possible that i have you confused with someone else....but i really dont think so. there's plenty of anonymity in a board name, so there's no way to know for sure....listen, i wont go into any more details on this matter, because this isnt the sort of board where sources are called out or even mentioned.

my final thought: i believe that you truly like HGH, and i guess in the context of this thread, that's all that really matters. even if you did have a professional bias, it wouldnt really matter because there are plenty of other guys out there who share your viewpoint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top