This is just plain wrong. Brown and white rice are totally different animals. In the heirarchy of the GI, white rice is higher than brown rice by a significant margin. White rice is much closer to a simple CHO and brown is way more complex. You appear to be placing these two in the same category.
This makes no sense in relation to what you are discussing and the sentence seems to be out of context. This sentence is discussing toxicity and relation to post lipid panels rather than the direct impact to blood sugar levels. By inference, this seems to be saying that if you CAN'T handle the hypo then it is toxic? And again, where's the data?
Why is it that those who are taken to task to support their argument, when, in the lack of the ability to cite valid data, resort to "Well, I should really kick your A$$, but I'm going to rise above it"?
1) Ok FIRST of all, I said "kick your butt", again another mis-quote by yourself. A$$ is more hostile than butt, so again i do love it when you edit my quote. Butt kicking was due to editing my quotes, and I still stand firm on that argument.
2) Brown rice and white rice are not animals (obviously you know this, but when you get to mis-quote and make my posting look stupid, i dont care) and white rice is usually derived from brown rice, with the husk removed during milling.
So again - same "animal". Secondly, both white and brown contain roughly the same amount of carbs per cup, with the exception that white is much easily digested and has less nutrients than brown.
My suggestion to him, was to try a baked potato (with the skin), which is higher on the GI index, but if correctly loaded with tuna, etc can fill him up longer than brown rice IN MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE!!!!! < emphasis
I did not in anyway dispute the GI index.
3) SD and its effect on blood sugar. Everyone knows that SD is a glycogen monster eater, and hers some homework for you to read on which would back up this statement.
i)
Invalid Link Removed
ii)
Invalid Link Removed (user had problems with nausea during workout )
iii) And that quote "" 30 mg of superdrol is not toxic EOD either if you can handle the hypo, must guys can. Lipid will stay good pulsing." Was an all round reference of SD, which mentions hypo as a major factor due to the SDs glocogen vacuum effect. This quote was by a major member of this board, who I will not name in light of recent events and due to their wishes. If you wish to tell them in your post that SD doesnt affect blood sugar and that they known nothing, in invite you to do it.
There are plenty of references that point to a more than likely correlation between SD and blood glycose levels. Without any scientific papers to hand, I cannot 99% verify that SD effects blood sugar. However, based on user experience and input from reputable industry members, it is highly likely that SD affects your blood glucose levels.
Please stop wasting my time here, and give the guy some helpful advice instead of bashing already known facts. If you have evidence SD doesnt effect blood gucose levels (posting a 2005 writeup really doesnt cut it anymore so dont try it as a reference - to save your credibility) then please, do share it with us.
As for distilled, I really dont think there is anything wrong with your diet at this point. As I did mention earlier (and you are free to research on this) SD does effect your blood sugar levels and is a glycogen monster, so as long as you keep your diet clean, I see no reason why you cannot eat when you feel hungry. To be frank with you, the hunger pangs on SD are normal as you can find on a lot of threads across the board.
However if Tbone is correct, you should be no more hungry on SD than you normally are.
