SARMS Osta or S4??
- 03-08-2011, 05:27 PM
- 03-08-2011, 06:34 PM
Ostarine. It's been shown to be less suppressive and has none of the ocular issues.BODY PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS REP
Sustain Alpha is back!
03-08-2011, 06:55 PM
from all the stuff ive read no one has really ran into vison issues with s4. I am also going to run DAA (5 on, 2off) and 1 cap of erase too. So im not too worried about the estrogen sides.
03-08-2011, 07:20 PM
03-08-2011, 08:31 PM
03-08-2011, 09:01 PM
03-08-2011, 09:20 PM
03-08-2011, 09:53 PM
03-08-2011, 10:08 PM
Yeah. They are about 70bux cheaper so I was leaning towards them. But if ss is the way to go than that's it
03-08-2011, 10:22 PM
The S4 tends to have vision sides (reported) at higher doses. It seems to be very individualistic based on what I've read in logs, but the rule of thumb appears to be higher = more vision sides.
The mk-2866 seems to have none of those sides and appears to have better votes of confidence in general for itself. It also appears to not need be dosed nearly as high to get decent benefits.
03-08-2011, 11:23 PM
Ive read every SARM thread on this site. Everyone says s4 has vision sides but everyones log ive read reported no issues like that. It also seems s4 is a little better if dosed higher than Osta in terms of gains, etc.
But doses with this stuff isnt like anything else. Everyone needs to find a personal "sweet spot" perhaps or really play around with dosing. higher dose doesnt mean more gains with a SARM.
03-10-2011, 05:18 PM
8wks is the longest Ive seen people run a SARM, what do you guys think??
Would any of you guys run one 10wks or 12??
03-10-2011, 06:54 PM
03-10-2011, 07:01 PM
Very many complaints of problems with night vision.
EDIT: I will add though - that I'm still thinking about trying S4 - since the common thread in the vision sides seems to be with high dosages.
03-10-2011, 07:21 PM
S4 gave me no vision sides I was actually looking forward to seeing everything with a yellow tint lol.
03-10-2011, 11:14 PM
03-10-2011, 11:17 PM
Month 1: S4=50mg/ED (slight vision sides)
Month 2: S4=25mg/ED and Ostarine 12.5mg/ED (No vision sides)
Month 3: Ostarine=12.5mg/ED by itself.
After a 3 month cut I got to 10% bf at 175lbs (5'-7"). I believe it helped me keep 10lbs.
As it was a cut, it was about preserving muscle which is harder to quantify as to what the actual gains are, but that was my best guess. Afterwards I ran an extensive blood test. Everything in the blood test appeared to be normal and I absolutely loved the results.
IMO for bulk PH/AAS is a better deal, but Sarms are better served during PCT or a cut as a break from the PH/AAS.
03-10-2011, 11:19 PM
03-11-2011, 06:21 AM
so Outstanding, your recommendation for *********** has nothing to do with the fact that you're a NTBM rep, and your hero russianstar happens to be affiliated with both NTBM and Sarmsseach?
just a weird coincidence i guess.
For me, the action IS the juice.
03-11-2011, 10:26 AM
03-11-2011, 10:34 AM
i still am wanting to hear somthing about results because the stuff ishigh as hell.andd for a couple months worth and all so lots of people are stacking this with other stuff your talking hundreds of dollars for a couple months worth hundreds.what kind of results are people geting with this standalone.what does it compare to result wise.
03-11-2011, 12:25 PM
03-11-2011, 12:39 PM
03-11-2011, 12:40 PM
For the money, IMO for bulk PH/AAS is a better deal, but Sarms are better served during PCT or a cut as a break from the PH/AAS. Trying to hang on to that muscle between bulk cycles is where a Sarm is useful. There have been some theories that sarms may loss effectiveness after a period of time, I have no idea if it is true, but if it proves to be true, we may also have to add on a 3rd step to refresh from the Sarm. I am considering alternating Ostarine and Clen/Albut between bulking cycles. At least until we know more...
03-11-2011, 03:03 PM
03-11-2011, 03:54 PM
Also, every other product I've ever repped or suggested over the years on this and countless other forums, I also own and receive direct checks in the mail from. Oh, I also own the Recompadrol Formula, the rights to LCLT manufacturing, Science Defined Nutrition, VPX, and Gaspari Nutrition's Size-On Pre Contest.
Wow, it felt so good to get that off my chest. I'm a new man!!!!
03-11-2011, 03:59 PM
With SARMS, AAS, and research peptides and chemicals like GHRP-2 and IGF-1-LR3 (which I have yet to try) it would be my contention that for the first time ever a truly dedicated and obsessively focused athlete is now able to attain and MAINTAIN his ideal physique without totally putting his bill of health on the chopping block.
03-11-2011, 04:00 PM
03-11-2011, 04:56 PM
03-11-2011, 05:19 PM
Or - JUST MAYBE... I suggest products that I spend money on and try, that work and that I believe will help other members expedite their own goals as they toil away just like the rest of us! NAH, COULDN'T BE THAT!
Conspiracies are so much more fun than just accepting someone like myself makes thousands of detailed and useful posts for the readership without receiving a PENNY of cushion into my checking account.
Similar Forum Threads
- By lickmahballs in forum AnabolicsReplies: 11Last Post: 09-24-2015, 06:06 PM
- By Dr.Lang in forum AnabolicsReplies: 42Last Post: 04-16-2012, 03:12 AM
- By russianstar in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 75Last Post: 04-05-2011, 05:10 PM
- By lpope in forum Supplement LogsReplies: 2Last Post: 03-30-2011, 07:29 PM
- By Dirty music in forum AnabolicsReplies: 19Last Post: 02-25-2011, 05:13 PM