results from the FDA supplement tests for the BB.com Raid so far.
- 11-02-2009, 05:45 PM
- 11-02-2009, 06:22 PM
11-02-2009, 07:54 PM
I agree with your more recent post where you say that the FDA will regulate the supplement industry through imposing stricter manufactering guidelines. This was put into place back in June, 2007 to my knowledge. It has been implemented and enforced incrementally according to the size of the company. The smallest companies (consisting of 5 or less employees) will be held to these standards by June of 2010. I might be mistaking, but I think there is also a bill that has already passed the house that would substantially expand the FDA's power. So I do agree that in the future supplement companies of every sort will be under greater pressure to conform to strict guidelines and won't get away with the things that they can now.
11-03-2009, 12:38 PM
Wait a sec bold 200 isn't even on that list right? There's 1 AD, 4AD, and actual bold with the 17b attached, but I don't see the PH on there at all
11-03-2009, 01:13 PM
11-03-2009, 11:34 PM
i haven't read every single post, but i haven't seen anyone mention that the raid could have been due to the fact that bb.com had a sub forum labelled AAS... just throwing that out there.
imo, i think that the raid were due to a possibility of them being a dealer for illegal substances due to the sub forum (or whatever its called lol). i know that in there, there was a section for homebrewing, cycles, pcts, and other stuff about using real gear. does anyone think that this raid may have been due to that? just my 2cents worth.
11-06-2009, 08:03 PM
11-07-2009, 12:45 AM
11-07-2009, 09:20 AM
11-08-2009, 03:30 PM
if thats not the case, then what's the other possibility? i haven't been able to find any plausible reasons throughout the dozens of boards and forums dedicated to bodybuilding (or something near it), or even on any site for that matter. could it be that its an "ongoing investigation" and they dont say anything, possibly. but does anyone have a clue?
11-08-2009, 03:34 PM
11-08-2009, 03:44 PM
Read the original posters data. These are steroids. They may be unclassified or unidentified as such, as of yet, on any legislation because that is what the industry has done to date - jump the loop holes of the legislation to continue to produce and sell steroids.
Now they have more to add to the list. A steroid is a steroid is a steroid. This warrant has afforded them the opportunity to have in hand what is out there and to identify, classify and schedule it.
I keep saying it and no one wants to hear it - "Keep messing with the FED/FDA/DEA"
"You see what you get Warriors. You see what you get when you mess with Orphans"
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1PVUvphYzg"]YouTube- The Warriors Vs The Orphans Fight (From Movie)[/ame]
11-19-2009, 03:53 PM
11-19-2009, 05:13 PM
11-19-2009, 05:23 PM
11-19-2009, 05:35 PM
Damn keypad sucks...rewrite...
First batch of testobolan/ and dthc, free t and total t off the charts ... Latest batch of testobolan and dtp, test showed decent rise but no where near that of the previous.. All other factors were equal during both runs.
11-19-2009, 05:41 PM
As for Iforce, notice that there SD was legit; also Dymethazine, it seems to me, might very well test out to be SD as it is essentially two SD molecules attached by an azine bond I believe.
11-19-2009, 05:55 PM
11-19-2009, 05:58 PM
yeah thats exactly what it is, but for some reason superdrol works better for peopleAs for Iforce, notice that there SD was legit; also Dymethazine, it seems to me, might very well test out to be SD as it is essentially two SD molecules attached by an azine bond I believe.
except azine means an organic compound that has a ring structure like benzene but with one or more carbon atoms replaced by a nitrogen atom.
so dymethazine means
two methylated 6 membered ring compounds with a nitrogen bond
i explained dymethazine here
what is Dymethazine,D-zine ?
its just not their list yet, the original steroid compound is uncommon in the U.Sno epistane brand appears!!! Is this a fake one?
11-19-2009, 08:13 PM
11-24-2009, 10:50 PM
am i looking too far into this? or does this even make sense to anyone else? haha
01-16-2010, 08:38 PM
The goverment has only one thing that they are concerned with POWER POWER & MORE F**(KING POWER to controll all and to remove the freedoms that our founders gave us with there BLOOD,There is very little they do and are trying to do that is by the law according to the constition.
01-16-2010, 09:43 PM
01-17-2010, 04:20 PM
wish i had money to buy me some more stackabol, super nox, ripped tabs, and maybe some slim x. hey, at least my guy who i go to isn't too worried for now when it comes to the bans, he's just gonna make hellacash.
now, my only concern is that with these supps possibly becoming illegal, even to posses, there poses a compromising situation. you get searched by chance after picking this stuff up one day (maybe due to a high speeding violation?), and a cop finds it... you're now a felon due to drug possession. i think the classification is bogus since these drugs are harmful, but less harmful than some of the otc drugs on the market.
i mean come on, you have people asking their doctors about about otc and prescription drugs because they saw it on tv, and they barely even have one of the symptoms it MAY treat. to quote robin williams here, "if a side effect is leaking from my a**hole, i think thats more likely an effect!". seriously people, stop watching tv, stop waiting for the miracle pill to shred fat and gain rapid muscle while you tap at your keyboards and wait for it to kick in. sorry for rambling, i'm just tired of the immature public that america has created/generated over this last generation of kids
Similar Forum Threads
- By HumanGrad in forum SupplementsReplies: 4Last Post: 07-14-2011, 11:06 AM
- By MC Gun in forum General ChatReplies: 1Last Post: 09-29-2009, 09:41 PM
- By wheycasein in forum AnabolicsReplies: 0Last Post: 03-09-2008, 11:36 PM
- By bpdaddy in forum SupplementsReplies: 29Last Post: 02-04-2003, 09:22 PM