+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 123458 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 186

Introducing Suppress-C - Advanced Cortisol Control Agent

  1.  04-14-2009  12:17 PM
    Board Sponsor CompEdgeLabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,147
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    645

    Originally Posted by lciaccio View Post
    Isn't that why retain was methylated? non-methylated is a plus. Not swallowing pills is a bigger plus!
    Alot of the feedback indicated that people preferred the non methylated over the methylated version of the ingredient, so I dont think it being methylated improved the absorption very much.



  2.  04-14-2009  12:18 PM
    Board Sponsor CompEdgeLabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,147
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    645

    Originally Posted by Mr.50 View Post
    It was in them for sure.....plus we did some "research" on it at university in injectible form (suspension) I believe.....




    plus it is not clear that methyl-androtriol has the same effects as non-methyl andro-triol. Remember methylation does more then just improve oral absorbtion......it also changes the tertiary structure of the molecule which affects binding and possibly transcription.

    Mr.50
    ^^^ Yeah, what he said Kidding, thanks for that explanation as to the methylation.

    I had used some of the old VPX ph's and loved them, but never even realized that this was in them. I really appreciate you pointing that out.

  3.  04-14-2009  01:26 PM
    Board Supporter Mr.50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Stats
    5'8"  208 lbs.
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,219
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1847

    Originally Posted by CompEdgeLabs View Post
    ^^^ Yeah, what he said Kidding, thanks for that explanation as to the methylation.

    I had used some of the old VPX ph's and loved them, but never even realized that this was in them. I really appreciate you pointing that out.
    No prob. I just started my Suppress-C last night so hopefully we will see similar sorts of results!

    Mr.50

  4.  04-14-2009  01:35 PM
    Registered User Zero V's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Stats
    5'10"  163 lbs.
    Location
    Under Gods grace
    Age
    26
    Posts
    6,276
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    3470

    looking nice. Very nice indeed. I need some cortisol blockers just to keep muscle with my stress

  5.  04-14-2009  01:42 PM
    Board Sponsor CompEdgeLabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,147
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    645

    Originally Posted by Mr.50 View Post
    No prob. I just started my Suppress-C last night so hopefully we will see similar sorts of results!

    Mr.50
    I look forward to seeing your progress. Do you intend on posting up a final review on your thoughts of it?

  6.  04-14-2009  01:48 PM
    Board Supporter Mr.50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Stats
    5'8"  208 lbs.
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,219
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1847

    Originally Posted by CompEdgeLabs View Post
    I look forward to seeing your progress. Do you intend on posting up a final review on your thoughts of it?
    Sure will. It will be a while though because I want to give it a full fair run because I am just coming off The One so I am in PCT and the first few weeks may be less then stellar.

    Mr.50

  7.  04-14-2009  04:45 PM
    Registered User lciaccio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    6'3"  205 lbs.
    Posts
    345
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    228

    Originally Posted by CompEdgeLabs View Post
    Alot of the feedback indicated that people preferred the non methylated over the methylated version of the ingredient, so I dont think it being methylated improved the absorption very much.

    From what I remember, people looking for more fat loss than cort control preferred the original retain (methylated).I think it was the other way around for the retain2 (non methylated), because the fat reduction was not as strong in retain 2.

  8.  04-14-2009  05:00 PM
    Board Sponsor CompEdgeLabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,147
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    645

    Originally Posted by lciaccio View Post
    From what I remember, people looking for more fat loss than cort control preferred the original retain (methylated).I think it was the other way around for the retain2 (non methylated), because the fat reduction was not as strong in retain 2.
    I think it was the opposite. Cortisol control would relate to fat loss.

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinions though.

  9.  04-14-2009  08:42 PM
    Registered User thebigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    indianapolis
    Posts
    22,503
    Reviews
    Read 51 Reviews
    Rep Power
    6624932

    either way, i am excited to try it along with td formestane-geat new products, cel.

  10.  04-14-2009  10:18 PM
    Registered User lciaccio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    6'3"  205 lbs.
    Posts
    345
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    228

    Originally Posted by thebigt View Post
    either way, i am excited to try it along with td formestane-geat new products, cel.
    Possibly, I wasn't sure so I was just looking for clarification. Thanks!

  11.  04-19-2009  12:16 PM
    Registered User jmh80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Beaumont, TX
    Age
    33
    Posts
    8,119
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    9649

    Originally Posted by thebigt View Post
    isn't this the main ingredient that was in the original retain that was so popular? btw jmh haven't heard from you in awhile.
    Yeah it is. ALRI methylated it - I figured dermal was a better route for bEAT.

    I've been swamped with work brah. I'm working 60 to 70 hrs and still hitting the gym. I'm around on the weekends somewhat.

    I think the good ole days of JMH and the 7000 posts are over.

  12.  04-19-2009  12:19 PM
    Registered User jmh80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Beaumont, TX
    Age
    33
    Posts
    8,119
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    9649

    CEL,
    When I'm not traveling so much, I'ma give this a run myself. Looking to see if I can find a female that trains to get her to try so you can have some things to market towards women.

    Now just isn't the time. Sorry.

  13.  04-19-2009  12:20 PM
    Registered User thebigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    indianapolis
    Posts
    22,503
    Reviews
    Read 51 Reviews
    Rep Power
    6624932

    Originally Posted by jmh80 View Post
    Yeah it is. ALRI methylated it - I figured dermal was a better route for bEAT.

    I've been swamped with work brah. I'm working 60 to 70 hrs and still hitting the gym. I'm around on the weekends somewhat.

    I think the good ole days of JMH and the 7000 posts are over.
    yeah, i am looking forward to trying the dermal in my coming pct-already have suppress-c on hand. btw i know about busy work schedules, will probably hit 64 hours or maybe more next week. hard to fit it all in.

  14.  04-19-2009  12:22 PM
    Registered User thebigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    indianapolis
    Posts
    22,503
    Reviews
    Read 51 Reviews
    Rep Power
    6624932

    Originally Posted by jmh80 View Post
    CEL,
    When I'm not traveling so much, I'ma give this a run myself. Looking to see if I can find a female that trains to get her to try so you can have some things to market towards women.

    Now just isn't the time. Sorry.
    always looking for a female to try things out on-same old jmh.

  15.  04-19-2009  04:14 PM
    Registered User jmh80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Beaumont, TX
    Age
    33
    Posts
    8,119
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    9649

    Originally Posted by thebigt View Post
    always looking for a female to try things out on-same old jmh.
    hehehehe

    I ain't changed none, brah.

  16.  05-01-2009  09:49 AM
    Board Supporter Harland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Stats
    6'1"  259 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    26
    Posts
    503
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    362

    Originally Posted by thebigt View Post
    yeah, i am looking forward to trying the dermal in my coming pct-already have suppress-c on hand. btw i know about busy work schedules, will probably hit 64 hours or maybe more next week. hard to fit it all in.
    how would you suggest dosing in a PCT?

  17.  05-01-2009  10:00 AM
    Registered User thebigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    indianapolis
    Posts
    22,503
    Reviews
    Read 51 Reviews
    Rep Power
    6624932

    Originally Posted by Harland View Post
    how would you suggest dosing in a PCT?
    2 squirts twice a day spread 8-12 hours apart. i can't wait to use it, probably start 2nd week of pct. cel had a lot of talks with nerdy science guys-well not really, but a lot of knowledgeable guys on another board a year or two ago. the b-andro was talked about a lot as a transdermal, i am very excited to finally have the chance to try it. td formestane/suppress-c and something like meltdown or lipo black may just be my summer cut after the cycle and pct are over. this supp is very versatile and has a ton of potential.

  18.  05-01-2009  10:10 AM
    Board Supporter Harland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Stats
    6'1"  259 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    26
    Posts
    503
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    362

    yeah im putting everything together for a pplex/estane cycle and had a possible 11oxo bridge in there, but instead i was thinking of running the form during the last couple weeks of cycle to keep poss gyno down and then run the supress c in the pct.

  19.  05-01-2009  10:25 AM
    Registered User thebigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    indianapolis
    Posts
    22,503
    Reviews
    Read 51 Reviews
    Rep Power
    6624932

    Originally Posted by Harland View Post
    yeah im putting everything together for a pplex/estane cycle and had a possible 11oxo bridge in there, but instead i was thinking of running the form during the last couple weeks of cycle to keep poss gyno down and then run the supress c in the pct.
    run the td formestane the whole cycle-pm celc5 for his advice, he started 2nd week of his pp cycle i think, even though i tried to twist his arm to start sooner. 2pumps2xday will be plenty of td formestane on cycle and one bottle will be plenty, but you may want to buy more because you will love it and it may be out of stock,lol. i think the suppress-c will be a great addition, start it week 2 of pct or wait till 10 days into it. i am eager to start mine so week 2 it is.

  20.  05-01-2009  12:37 PM
    Registered User russianstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Stats
    6'2"  209 lbs.
    Location
    russia
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,323
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1249

    Ive ordered this too, exactly what i wanted.
    Gause institute member

    Need2slin designer.Product designer/ **** admin.

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 123458 ... LastLast

Similar Forum Threads

  1. DTP and Suppress C....Too much cortisol suppression?
    By TheDarkHalf in forum Supplements
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-03-2010, 12:23 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-30-2009, 04:57 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-01-2009, 10:05 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 06:27 PM