my question involves 2 hypothetical scenarios - scenarios which i may consider for myself actually. here goes: test enanthate run at the normal dosing (from what i study thats about 500 , right?) + equipoise ( also run normal dosing, forgot what that is but thats not point) versus tren (norm dosing, 75) and boldenone. now, of course the equipoise is in the for the increase in appetite. run with test enanthate this should really help pack on the mass. however, supposedly this mass aquired is extremely hard to keep. whereas, tren and equipoise would produce less mass gains but more keepable muscle. however is it safe to say that after proper pct of both different cycles, u will still net just about the same amount. here check it out to follow me
hypothetically lets say test and eq u grossed a 25 pound gain and then after pct u lose 15 but keep 10. so now weve a net gain of 10. now lwts say with tren and eq you gain 15 pouns, but lose 5. u have a net gain of 10. both scenarios you NET the same after all is over. i ask this due to myself weighing out my options for next cycle, and it seems in the end it may not matter which route i choose. i may be totally and completely wrong in all accounts, but i ask for your thoughts and opinions of such theory, as you guys have the knowledge of experience thanks
hypothetically lets say test and eq u grossed a 25 pound gain and then after pct u lose 15 but keep 10. so now weve a net gain of 10. now lwts say with tren and eq you gain 15 pouns, but lose 5. u have a net gain of 10. both scenarios you NET the same after all is over. i ask this due to myself weighing out my options for next cycle, and it seems in the end it may not matter which route i choose. i may be totally and completely wrong in all accounts, but i ask for your thoughts and opinions of such theory, as you guys have the knowledge of experience thanks